Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

Postby StrayDog » Fri Mar 21, 2014 2:38 am

dedja wrote:Yeah, OK, I meant it too early to make conclusions ...

To draw final conclusions, for sure.

Still - and I'm no expert on mid-season membership trends - it does look as though those figure are struggling a touch, given we're only a fortnight out from the first bounce in anger,
"— here I opened wide the door; —
Darkness there, and nothing more."


- Edgar Allan Poe from " The Raven "

StrayDog
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1403
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:26 pm
Location: Copping a "feel for the game"
Has liked: 1147 times
Been liked: 194 times

Re: Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

Postby UK Fan » Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:51 am

topsywaldron wrote:Great post Golden Dynasty.

You or Centurion involved at all with this proposed protest at the SANFL Commissioners lunch at Adelaide Oval next week?


First I've heard of it tbh!!!
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5658
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1202 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

Postby sjt » Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:58 am

UK Fan wrote:
dedja wrote:It's totally meaningless to compare this years membership numbers with previous years this early ... come back in a few months time with some solid facts.


Not according to the SANFL it isn't!!!

You expect bays to increase membership by 40% to match last years numbers in the coming months ???

Not taking into account memberships costs are down 10-20% down on last year.


Yeah, but there's going to be 4000 paying crows supporters going week in week out.....hmm
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

Postby UK Fan » Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:59 am

StrayDog wrote:
dedja wrote:Yeah, OK, I meant it too early to make conclusions ...

To draw final conclusions, for sure.

Still - and I'm no expert on mid-season membership trends - it does look as though those figure are struggling a touch, given we're only a fortnight out from the first bounce in anger,


X2
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5658
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1202 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

Postby beenreal » Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:16 am

dedja wrote:It's totally meaningless to compare this years membership numbers with previous years this early ... come back in a few months time with some solid facts.


There remains another 3+ months to buy memberships. And don't underestimate the potential uptake once SANFL football starts being shown on a REAL network.
PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB
Serving the community since 1870
Developing footballers for 143 years
Proud of the Past, Confident of the Future
User avatar
beenreal
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:57 am
Location: Port Adelaide
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

Postby whufc » Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:05 am

I also wonder how much income is lost from people downgrading their memberships from season tickets to home match tickets. I know at least 5 people who I go to the footy with who have done that this year
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 27519
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5588 times
Been liked: 2529 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

Postby UK Fan » Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:42 am

beenreal wrote:
dedja wrote:It's totally meaningless to compare this years membership numbers with previous years this early ... come back in a few months time with some solid facts.


There remains another 3+ months to buy memberships. And don't underestimate the potential uptake once SANFL football starts being shown on a REAL network.


I know which tv station is telecasting SANFL has been a major factor as to whether I buy a membership in the past.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5658
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1202 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

Postby beenreal » Fri Mar 21, 2014 12:20 pm

More big picture thinking, the size of a postage stamp hey UK.

We can only imagine if Internet forums had been around in 1964.

"Two new teams? Oh my god, it'll wreak the competition. I hate change, it makes the sky fall in. That's it, no more membership for me, I'm not going!"

8)
PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB
Serving the community since 1870
Developing footballers for 143 years
Proud of the Past, Confident of the Future
User avatar
beenreal
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:57 am
Location: Port Adelaide
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

Postby UK Fan » Fri Mar 21, 2014 12:28 pm

I know that members also like to have their membership card/season tickets organised before round 1 otherwise its is seen as a bit of a waste of money,

It also takes club usually a week to get the membership pack out in the post and with the season looming in two weeks.

I seriously doubt we will see a huge increase in membership n the next 3 months.

Time will tell.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5658
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1202 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

Postby UK Fan » Fri Mar 21, 2014 12:31 pm

beenreal wrote:More big picture thinking, the size of a postage stamp hey UK.

We can only imagine if Internet forums had been around in 1964.

"Two new teams? Oh my god, it'll wreak the competition. I hate change, it makes the sky fall in. That's it, no more membership for me, I'm not going!"

8)




Keep imagining Beeny!!!!.

Your pal always UK :D
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5658
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1202 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

Postby sjt » Fri Mar 21, 2014 1:33 pm

beenreal wrote:More big picture thinking, the size of a postage stamp hey UK.

We can only imagine if Internet forums had been around in 1964.

"Two new teams? Oh my god, it'll wreak the competition. I hate change, it makes the sky fall in. That's it, no more membership for me, I'm not going!"

8)

I reckon in 64, a player from one of the new teams wouldn't have being earning the same as the whole salary of the other established teams. I don't think it's so much the change more the terms and conditions. They've pissed off the real supporters to appease those that don't attend the sanfl.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Trial Game Week 2 Discussion

Postby tipper » Fri Mar 21, 2014 2:36 pm

beenreal wrote:More big picture thinking, the size of a postage stamp hey UK.

We can only imagine if Internet forums had been around in 1964.

"Two new teams? Oh my god, it'll wreak the competition. I hate change, it makes the sky fall in. That's it, no more membership for me, I'm not going!"

8)


i wouldnt have had the slightest problem if the sanfl introduced two new teams to the sanfl this season, i would have welcomed it, bringing the competition to an even 10 teams would have been good, i never liked the bye, just imagine two genuine teams fighting for a flag under the same rules as the rest of the teams. (and getting rid of the stillborn magpies in the process). why do simpletons always assume those against the afl reserves teams were against any change at all??

but the sanfl didnt invite two new teams to our league. they allowed two reserves sides from another competition to use the league as a play thing, to allegedly help them in a competition that has nothing to do anymore with our great league. all for a handfull of cash. shame :oops: they bent over and cried for the afl to see how far they could shove it in, and congratulated them on the result.

not that i expect you to understand beeny, you have shown repeatedly you dont give two **** for the league your beloved team helped shape. and when the afl sides **** of completely to their stand alone reserves comp (which is only a matter of time) ill not be sorry to see them go.
tipper
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2857
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:45 am
Has liked: 359 times
Been liked: 531 times
Grassroots Team: Peake

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |