hill wrote:nicole wrote:correct Boosh
How did the trial against West Croydon go.
Was scrappy, we just won in both games
by Boosh » Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:00 pm
hill wrote:nicole wrote:correct Boosh
How did the trial against West Croydon go.
by old farmer » Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:10 pm
Boosh wrote:Interested to see Rosewaters recruiting manager Darren Grimmond at the North Haven v West Croydon game, wonder which players he was looking at.
by Boosh » Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:17 pm
old farmer wrote:Boosh wrote:Interested to see Rosewaters recruiting manager Darren Grimmond at the North Haven v West Croydon game, wonder which players he was looking at.
Would be watching WC as a whole i would think as they are in div 6
by Mr Beefy » Tue Mar 25, 2014 12:09 pm
Boosh wrote:old farmer wrote:Boosh wrote:Interested to see Rosewaters recruiting manager Darren Grimmond at the North Haven v West Croydon game, wonder which players he was looking at.
Would be watching WC as a whole i would think as they are in div 6
In his role as recruiting officer for Rosewater I would assume he would be busy recruiting more of our juniors
by Boosh » Tue Mar 25, 2014 12:48 pm
by Mr Beefy » Tue Mar 25, 2014 12:53 pm
by Pag » Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:19 pm
by carey » Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:20 pm
Pag wrote:We have a junior from our club, went to Port, and is now at Port District, with no other connections that I can see.
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:27 pm
carey wrote:Pag wrote:We have a junior from our club, went to Port, and is now at Port District, with no other connections that I can see.
Wow that's really poor form.
by Boosh » Wed Mar 26, 2014 9:32 am
Pag wrote:We have a junior from our club, went to Port, and is now at Port District, with no other connections that I can see.
by Mr Beefy » Wed Mar 26, 2014 9:52 am
Boosh wrote:Pag wrote:We have a junior from our club, went to Port, and is now at Port District, with no other connections that I can see.
We would have on average 10 a year in that boat mate, the sooner Port Adelaide lose thier juniors the better it will be for the Port Adelaide area.
by jo172 » Wed Mar 26, 2014 9:56 am
Mr Beefy wrote:Boosh wrote:Pag wrote:We have a junior from our club, went to Port, and is now at Port District, with no other connections that I can see.
We would have on average 10 a year in that boat mate, the sooner Port Adelaide lose thier juniors the better it will be for the Port Adelaide area.
Not really, if the zone goes to WWT, then the players will be told to go to Henley or SMOSH....
by HH3 » Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:24 am
by Dogwatcher » Wed Mar 26, 2014 11:29 am
HH3 wrote:Port told me to stay at North Haven.....weird
by Demon Juke » Wed Mar 26, 2014 9:17 pm
jo172 wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Boosh wrote:Pag wrote:We have a junior from our club, went to Port, and is now at Port District, with no other connections that I can see.
We would have on average 10 a year in that boat mate, the sooner Port Adelaide lose thier juniors the better it will be for the Port Adelaide area.
Not really, if the zone goes to WWT, then the players will be told to go to Henley or SMOSH....
If you're in the Norwood Zone you'll find the senior coach is steering blokes towards Langhorne Creek (for obvious reasons).
Very frustrating.
by The Dark Knight » Sat Mar 29, 2014 6:12 pm
by hillscrow » Sat Mar 29, 2014 10:58 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:Very good hitout for us against Rosewater today, we won both A and B grade games, the ideal result for us heading into round one next Saturday against Westminster. I was very happy with all the boys efforts today, everyone gave it a red hot crack. We hit the footy hard, the defensive pressure was very good and most of our ball movement was quite good. Exactly the kind of hitout we needed going into next week, big thanks to Rosewater for the hitout. Footy is back f**k yeah.
by gadj1976 » Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:32 am
hillscrow wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Very good hitout for us against Rosewater today, we won both A and B grade games, the ideal result for us heading into round one next Saturday against Westminster. I was very happy with all the boys efforts today, everyone gave it a red hot crack. We hit the footy hard, the defensive pressure was very good and most of our ball movement was quite good. Exactly the kind of hitout we needed going into next week, big thanks to Rosewater for the hitout. Footy is back f**k yeah.
Rosewater have got big wraps...how'd they look?
by beeroclock » Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:03 am
Boosh wrote:Pag wrote:We have a junior from our club, went to Port, and is now at Port District, with no other connections that I can see.
We would have on average 10 a year in that boat mate, the sooner Port Adelaide lose thier juniors the better it will be for the Port Adelaide area.
by The Dark Knight » Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:07 am
gadj1976 wrote:hillscrow wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Very good hitout for us against Rosewater today, we won both A and B grade games, the ideal result for us heading into round one next Saturday against Westminster. I was very happy with all the boys efforts today, everyone gave it a red hot crack. We hit the footy hard, the defensive pressure was very good and most of our ball movement was quite good. Exactly the kind of hitout we needed going into next week, big thanks to Rosewater for the hitout. Footy is back f**k yeah.
Rosewater have got big wraps...how'd they look?
They are much taller than us and looked quite good. I think the final score was something like 13.4 to 6.14 (not trying to be controversial, I didn't see the final score i was running around after my 5 year old!) which meant they had plenty of it. From what I saw, they should've been a lot closer. They looked fit. They ran well. They look to be well drilled too. They'll do well in Div 6.
From our perspective, we ran out of soldiers. Three blokes out with over a quarter to go in warm conditions didn't help but those guys out there did exceptionally well.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |