Rnd 4 - Port Magpies v West @ Alberton Oval (Sat 26/4)

[Dols]

Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.

[Big Phil]

Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.

None of which Port Adelaide Magpies have as of 1st January 2014, in my opinion and that of many, many more passionate SANFL people, including some Port folk...

They are a new entity and not the Port Magpies of old. They are Port Adelaide Power Reserves side masquerading as the Port Adelaide Magpies.

[Tech1]

Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.

Wrong again

"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."

[Dols]

Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.

Wrong again

"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."

show me where that is different for PA?

[heater31]

Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.

Wrong again

"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."

show me where that is different for PA?

Steven Summerton played SANFL league football last season and he is now the bloody captain of the Port Power B grade

[Dols]

Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.

Wrong again

"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."

show me where that is different for PA?

Steven Summerton played SANFL league football last season and he is now the bloody captain of the Port Power B grade

ian callinan played AFL footy last year

[JK]

Johansen, Slattery, Rakiwasa?

[Tech1]

Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.

Wrong again

"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."

show me where that is different for PA?

You're not playing with a full deck are you. I just replied to your post, it's pretty straight forward, you where able to keep a bunch of players that played SANFL last year one an ex afl player maybe two ex afl players now on "$400 a game", not just the one leadership player, just like the crows have with Ian Callinan. You decided to keep Slattery as your leadership player and then pay Summerton "$400" a game, because he wasn't 28 yet and didn't qualify to be one.

[Jim05]

Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.

Wrong again

"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."

show me where that is different for PA?

Port were allowed to keep their Magpie players from last year if they chose to

[Dols]

Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.

Wrong again

"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."

show me where that is different for PA?

You're not playing with a full deck are you. I just replied to your post, it's pretty straight forward, you where able to keep a bunch of players that played SANFL last year one an ex afl player maybe two ex afl players now on "$400 a game", not just the one leadership player, just like the crows have with Ian Callinan. You decided to keep Slattery as your leadership player and then pay Summerton "$400" a game, because he wasn't 28 yet and didn't qualify to be one.

you can't recruit players that already play for you, they are retained. The same recruiting condition apply. That's why Marlon
Motlop could not be recruited.

[Tech1]

Oh dear....forget i said anything.

[dedja]

Power reserves to win by 60+

glad you put the + in there.

Did you notice he called them Power Reserves?

[Big Phil]

Power reserves to win by 60+

glad you put the + in there.

Did you notice he called them Power Reserves?

Well, they certainly aren't the old Magpies he once loved...

[Dols]

Power reserves to win by 60+

glad you put the + in there.

Did you notice he called them Power Reserves?

call them what you want #weareportadelaide

[sjt]

Please don't pm me. I didn't mean to "like" one of dols comments. I was going to comment, but then I realised he's got to be
Joking.

[the joker]

There's no way Summo is only on 400 a week at the magpies

[Big Phil]

There's no way Summo is only on 400 a week at the magpies

Isn't he on a back-ended contract where he will be earning over $100K in 2016?

[the joker]

There's no way Summo is only on 400 a week at the magpies

Isn't he on a back-ended contract where he will be earning over $100K in 2016?

im not sure. But he could get 1500+ to play country. So 400 is way off the mark

[Dols]

There's no way Summo is only on 400 a week at the magpies

according to the official figures he is!!! When he turns 28 he will be on much more. Back ended deal!!!!!

[The Dark Knight]

Power reserves to win by 60+

glad you put the + in there.

Did you notice he called them Power Reserves?

Well, they certainly aren't the old Magpies he once loved...

And I'd love to know what he thinks of it, if he ever wants to comment about it (I'm not sure if he has before). Calling them the Power reserves is perhaps all he has to say on the matter.