by johntheclaret » Sat Aug 23, 2014 7:17 pm
by Apachebulldog » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:13 pm
by matt35 » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:41 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:52 pm
matt35 wrote:Get ready for three figure crowds if the insanity being suggested here ever actually came off! Would create multiple meaningless games. Port supporters certainly would not bother with the SANFL. Would be a farce that nobody would want to watch. Huge losses would be made on the games involving Adelaide and Port Adelaide. Thankfully, I very strongly suspect that the 8 SANFL clubs have far more common sense than to engage in such total insanity.
by bennymacca » Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:10 pm
by whufc » Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:15 pm
bennymacca wrote:Since when do they have no hope of beating the sides? Norwood just spanked the crows
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:29 pm
bennymacca wrote:Since when do they have no hope of beating the sides? Norwood just spanked the crows
by bennymacca » Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:33 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:38 pm
bennymacca wrote:Port are moving towards the same as the crows aren't they? Both of them having ammos teams for their topups. I thought this was almost certain?
by bennymacca » Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:40 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:46 pm
bennymacca wrote:Well summerton is similar to callinan. Got no issue with one player.
You won't find many u21 that have never been in the sanfl system at any time.
I think the crows current model with an academy side for topups instead of getting them from anywhere (ie uni) would work ok.
by RB » Sun Aug 24, 2014 12:08 am
by Tech1 » Sun Aug 24, 2014 1:36 am
bennymacca wrote:Well summerton is similar to callinan. Got no issue with one player.
You won't find many u21 that have never been in the sanfl system at any time.
I think the crows current model with an academy side for topups instead of getting them from anywhere (ie uni) would work ok.
by Tech1 » Sun Aug 24, 2014 1:40 am
Jim05 wrote:bennymacca wrote:Well summerton is similar to callinan. Got no issue with one player.
You won't find many u21 that have never been in the sanfl system at any time.
I think the crows current model with an academy side for topups instead of getting them from anywhere (ie uni) would work ok.
Shouldnt have any mature age recruits.
They are grown men not babies dont see why they need a leadership player as such.
And Port have more than player with decent SANFL experience.
As for the u21 bit, restrict it so that you must of been out of a state league system for 2 years that way it would stop the 2 sides pinching current SANFL players
by whufc » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:30 am
Tech1 wrote:Jim05 wrote:bennymacca wrote:Well summerton is similar to callinan. Got no issue with one player.
You won't find many u21 that have never been in the sanfl system at any time.
I think the crows current model with an academy side for topups instead of getting them from anywhere (ie uni) would work ok.
Shouldnt have any mature age recruits.
They are grown men not babies dont see why they need a leadership player as such.
And Port have more than player with decent SANFL experience.
As for the u21 bit, restrict it so that you must of been out of a state league system for 2 years that way it would stop the 2 sides pinching current SANFL players
100% Exactly spot on if they complain as we all know they will maybe u/23 but no leadership player is needed, takes out the option for any team bending the rules to get exceptions like they have now, hope the SANFL clubs don't except anything less.
by CUTTERMAN » Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:26 pm
bennymacca wrote:Well summerton is similar to callinan. Got no issue with one player.
You won't find many u21 that have never been in the sanfl system at any time.
I think the crows current model with an academy side for topups instead of getting them from anywhere (ie uni) would work ok.
by CUTTERMAN » Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:30 pm
by dedja » Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:32 pm
by bennymacca » Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:01 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:bennymacca wrote:Well summerton is similar to callinan. Got no issue with one player.
You won't find many u21 that have never been in the sanfl system at any time.
I think the crows current model with an academy side for topups instead of getting them from anywhere (ie uni) would work ok.
You're wrong. Sluttery is similar to Callinan as their over 27(?) year old player that doesn't have to come under the $400/game payment. They tried to weasel around the rules at the start of the season and use it for $ommerton as Sluttery is working for PAFC.
And this is my point, they are already trying to cheat the rules, and are, so no matter what checks and balances they put in place it will be cheated and the SANFL have to police it.
As for the crowds dropping if they aren't allowed to play finals, it's not like Adelaide supporters are going and Ports crowds aren't that great either. So big ******* deal! **** them off!
by Wedgie » Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:21 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |