whufc wrote:Yep never felt the need to jump off a side and competition that I had supported for 10 years and support a side in a competition in another state that i had no affiliation in.
But no hating of Port?
by cracka » Sat Aug 30, 2014 8:31 pm
whufc wrote:Yep never felt the need to jump off a side and competition that I had supported for 10 years and support a side in a competition in another state that i had no affiliation in.
by whufc » Sat Aug 30, 2014 8:37 pm
cracka wrote:whufc wrote:Yep never felt the need to jump off a side and competition that I had supported for 10 years and support a side in a competition in another state that i had no affiliation in.
But no hating of Port?
by cracka » Sat Aug 30, 2014 9:30 pm
whufc wrote:cracka wrote:whufc wrote:Yep never felt the need to jump off a side and competition that I had supported for 10 years and support a side in a competition in another state that i had no affiliation in.
But no hating of Port?
I respected the Port Magpies but now it's to hard to work out which club it actually is! It hurts my tiny brain
by carey » Sat Aug 30, 2014 9:54 pm
cracka wrote:whufc wrote:cracka wrote:whufc wrote:Yep never felt the need to jump off a side and competition that I had supported for 10 years and support a side in a competition in another state that i had no affiliation in.
But no hating of Port?
I respected the Port Magpies but now it's to hard to work out which club it actually is! It hurts my tiny brain
What about Port Power when they came into the comp & were a separate identity to the Magpies.
by cracka » Sat Aug 30, 2014 10:08 pm
carey wrote:cracka wrote:whufc wrote:cracka wrote:But no hating of Port?
I respected the Port Magpies but now it's to hard to work out which club it actually is! It hurts my tiny brain
What about Port Power when they came into the comp & were a separate identity to the Magpies.
I guess the Crows are just an easy team to hate!
by LaughingKookaburra » Sun Aug 31, 2014 12:11 am
by TEX07 » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:09 am
LaughingKookaburra wrote:As much as I hate the Crows missing out our defensive structure is shithouse and is ten times worse without Otten. Even if we got through to next week we'd be ripped a new arsehole and had our prostates reconstructed by Port. Richmond are a real chance to better last year and this can start great things for this club going forward.....
by kickinit » Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:12 am
TEX07 wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:As much as I hate the Crows missing out our defensive structure is shithouse and is ten times worse without Otten. Even if we got through to next week we'd be ripped a new arsehole and had our prostates reconstructed by Port. Richmond are a real chance to better last year and this can start great things for this club going forward.....
Agreed, the way port are back playing we would have been well beaten - still would have liked to have been there though. Found it quite funny how many Power supporters were last night cheering on the Tigers - purely because of not wanting the crows in, Richmond will put up a bigger fight next week than we would have, out of us WC and Tigers - on current form Tigers would have been the only side with a chance to progress past the first week. Fact is I think WC will win today too so th crows would have been out anyway - cant see St Kilda lying down today if we needed a massive win either - just another end to another wasted season. Winning 9 in a row, travelling across all states to do so, that's a team that deserves to be playing finals.
by whufc » Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:53 am
by wristwatcher » Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:58 am
by cracka » Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:02 am
kickinit wrote:TEX07 wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:As much as I hate the Crows missing out our defensive structure is shithouse and is ten times worse without Otten. Even if we got through to next week we'd be ripped a new arsehole and had our prostates reconstructed by Port. Richmond are a real chance to better last year and this can start great things for this club going forward.....
Agreed, the way port are back playing we would have been well beaten - still would have liked to have been there though. Found it quite funny how many Power supporters were last night cheering on the Tigers - purely because of not wanting the crows in, Richmond will put up a bigger fight next week than we would have, out of us WC and Tigers - on current form Tigers would have been the only side with a chance to progress past the first week. Fact is I think WC will win today too so th crows would have been out anyway - cant see St Kilda lying down today if we needed a massive win either - just another end to another wasted season. Winning 9 in a row, travelling across all states to do so, that's a team that deserves to be playing finals.
We wouldn't of beaten the crows that easily in week1. Our home ground advantage would of went out the window because the way ticket sales are setup.
I lost all respect for the Crows when Nigel Smart got in front of the camera and basically said it didn't matter what any SA team thought of the crows wearing the state guernsey.
by cracka » Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:06 am
wristwatcher wrote:How much do the Crows need to win by to make the 8
by kickinit » Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:13 am
cracka wrote:Crows wouldn't have beaten Port now they are back in form. Jim05 has been correctly saying for a while 6th to 8th are just making up the numbers. Richmond are the in form team of those 3 so should be a cracking game.
by cracka » Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:15 am
whufc wrote:Agree Nigel Smart didnt help their causes!!
High class knob head
by TEX07 » Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:16 am
kickinit wrote:TEX07 wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:As much as I hate the Crows missing out our defensive structure is shithouse and is ten times worse without Otten. Even if we got through to next week we'd be ripped a new arsehole and had our prostates reconstructed by Port. Richmond are a real chance to better last year and this can start great things for this club going forward.....
Agreed, the way port are back playing we would have been well beaten - still would have liked to have been there though. Found it quite funny how many Power supporters were last night cheering on the Tigers - purely because of not wanting the crows in, Richmond will put up a bigger fight next week than we would have, out of us WC and Tigers - on current form Tigers would have been the only side with a chance to progress past the first week. Fact is I think WC will win today too so th crows would have been out anyway - cant see St Kilda lying down today if we needed a massive win either - just another end to another wasted season. Winning 9 in a row, travelling across all states to do so, that's a team that deserves to be playing finals.
We wouldn't of beaten the crows that easily in week1. Our home ground advantage would of went out the window because the way ticket sales are setup.
I lost all respect for the Crows when Nigel Smart got in front of the camera and basically said it didn't matter what any SA team thought of the crows wearing the state guernsey.
by Rik E Boy » Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:20 am
wristwatcher wrote:How much do the Crows need to win by to make the 8
by Jim05 » Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:26 am
TEX07 wrote:
How was the setup going to be? I thought I heard somewhere it was almost 50/50? If that was the case it would have been unfair - power fans would have clearly earns the right to outnumber the crows. It's not an issue now anyway - the finals games should actually be good contests this year!
As a crows supporter I actually have never liked Nigel Smart - always looked arrogant to me as a player and the state guernsey thing proved his arrogance off.
by BoundaryRider84 » Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:29 am
by Jim05 » Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:35 am
BoundaryRider84 wrote:Not a crows hater at all, but had some banter with a crows supporter last night at work after Richmond won and she was upset, but discussed the highlights. Betts was a win for the crows, a return of 40-50 goals from a small forward is winning. Sam Jacobs had an All Austtalian year, but he needs help other than Jenkins. I'd be chasing Bellchambers, because Graham and McKernan are over priced hacks.
The funny point was when she told me Geelong would fail (knows I'm a cats can). I went on to say its okay the last 7 years has given me great joy. She went on to ask me what we had achieved, should have been better. 07 premiers, 08 Gf, 09 premiers, 10 Prelim, 11 premiers, 12 semi, 13 prelim. She was actually serious! The. She brought up that we hadn't gone back to back like them, a long 16 years ago........gosh still holding on.
Anyway I reckon the crows throw money at Bellchambers, another inside mid, running mid and a senior assistant to help Sando, he seems to be a little one dimensional. I hear Bomber might be free, now King Druggy is back at Essendon.
by TEX07 » Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:40 am
Jim05 wrote:TEX07 wrote:
How was the setup going to be? I thought I heard somewhere it was almost 50/50? If that was the case it would have been unfair - power fans would have clearly earns the right to outnumber the crows. It's not an issue now anyway - the finals games should actually be good contests this year!
As a crows supporter I actually have never liked Nigel Smart - always looked arrogant to me as a player and the state guernsey thing proved his arrogance off.
No it goes on pro-rata.
Crows have a 60-40 split according to the AFL so tickets would of been allocated that way. Moot point now anyway
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |