by stan » Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:23 am
by GWW » Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:37 am
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:51 am
shoe boy wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:how about David Johnston and his comments???
goin to be an entertaining Question Time
I have seen the clip now
When put in context, it makes sense
The ASC cant tell him how much over budget they are
Somewhere between $350m to over $600m
No wonder Wong doesnt mind - that's a drop in the ocean of what she wasted in her time
Jimmy you are a bigger clown than I thought.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:53 am
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:59 am
by stan » Thu Nov 27, 2014 9:26 am
GWW wrote:Im not a fan of Abbott or his Govt, but the $7 co-payment is a no-brainer really.
by stan » Thu Nov 27, 2014 9:28 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Thank you David Johnston
the next time there is a household fight
the *male can apologise for getting into a rhetorical flourish
as females rarely apologise
by mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Nov 27, 2014 10:55 am
stan wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Thank you David Johnston
the next time there is a household fight
the *male can apologise for getting into a rhetorical flourish
as females rarely apologise
Pleas try that for us all first. If we dont here from you we will just assume your missus ended you [emoji6]
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:31 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:40 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:well as much as I tried to annoy the mrs, it got to the point where I even used rhetorical flourish to try and bait her.....no success.
by shoe boy » Mon Dec 01, 2014 7:27 am
by stan » Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:19 am
shoe boy wrote:A one term Lib government in Victoria and Tony and his mate Hocky say nothing to do with us!!!
by woodublieve12 » Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:20 am
stan wrote:shoe boy wrote:A one term Lib government in Victoria and Tony and his mate Hocky say nothing to do with us!!!
Interesting result. So SA and Vic now have labor state governments.
by bennymacca » Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:41 am
woodublieve12 wrote:stan wrote:shoe boy wrote:A one term Lib government in Victoria and Tony and his mate Hocky say nothing to do with us!!!
Interesting result. So SA and Vic now have labor state governments.
how so?
by shoe boy » Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:23 am
bennymacca wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:stan wrote:shoe boy wrote:A one term Lib government in Victoria and Tony and his mate Hocky say nothing to do with us!!!
Interesting result. So SA and Vic now have labor state governments.
how so?
The recent trend has been from labor to liberal, it wasn't that long ago that all state governments were labor (I think)
Seems they pendulum is swinging again.
by Psyber » Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:02 am
by Booney » Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:03 am
bennymacca wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:stan wrote:shoe boy wrote:A one term Lib government in Victoria and Tony and his mate Hocky say nothing to do with us!!!
Interesting result. So SA and Vic now have labor state governments.
how so?
The recent trend has been from labor to liberal, it wasn't that long ago that all state governments were labor (I think)
Seems they pendulum is swinging again.
by Booney » Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:07 am
Psyber wrote:There is a real problem in politics.
One major party appears, from what it says, to be more compassionate in social terms, but has a consistent history of running up excessive debt when in power, at state or federal level, in the interest of retaining power with promised goodies for the swinging voters, while also demonstrating a strong trace of self interest among its parliamentary members. The other major party is financially more responsible, but seems to lack the compassion and common sense to make sure the necessaries economies to reduce the debt don't bite those who can afford it least, and the same strong trace of self interest.
The voters on the whole seem to side with one or other of these groups most of the time with only a small group of swinging voters determining outcomes. So we have a pattern of nasty oscillations set up.
If I were PM now I'd set the example by taking a 40% cut in salary and asking all other MPs to do the same, to demonstrate good faith, while we work out a strategy to reduce the deficit with minimum harm to the most vulnerable. But, such is my scepticism of all party's declared good intentions that I expect nearly all MPs in all party groups (and the independents) would unite against me and I wouldn't last long.
So who is for forming a Self-sacrifice Party?
by Psyber » Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:24 am
by bennymacca » Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:35 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |