Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby Booney » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:29 am

3 games to 2 is my guess.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58211
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7467 times
Been liked: 10755 times

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby Big Phil » Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:27 am

Booney wrote:3 games to 2 is my guess.

Agreed. Reckon that will be about spot on the money, mate...
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20257
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 120 times
Been liked: 271 times

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby RustyCage » Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:53 am

My gut feeling is the tribunal will be very hard on it, definitely wasn't an accident and even though it seems he was just showing the ump what had happened, it wasn't done in a friendly manner. I'm thinking 7-8.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15272
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1260 times
Been liked: 933 times

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby Wedgie » Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:56 am

I'd just give a warning, I wouldn't even call it a push!
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 50781
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2020 times
Been liked: 3862 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby johntheclaret » Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:51 pm

Wedgie wrote:I'd just give a warning, I wouldn't even call it a push!

The ump didn't react to it either, or at least didn't appear to.
Last edited by johntheclaret on Wed Apr 22, 2015 10:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13279
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby saintal » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:26 pm

Deserves a couple of weeks. Not a good look, plus I don't particularly like Moore so I'm biased.
SAFC- 60 years...
StKFC- 58 years..
User avatar
saintal
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5658
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills
Has liked: 346 times
Been liked: 428 times

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby JK » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:36 pm

2 down to 1 would be fine (just because we have them this weekend)
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37368
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4438 times
Been liked: 2985 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby saintal » Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:25 pm

3 weeks by the looks of it.
SAFC- 60 years...
StKFC- 58 years..
User avatar
saintal
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5658
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills
Has liked: 346 times
Been liked: 428 times

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby Wedgie » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:06 pm

saintal wrote:3 weeks by the looks of it.

Correct.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 50781
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2020 times
Been liked: 3862 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby Rising Power » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:11 pm

Seems an odd number. Give him either 1 due to minor contact or 8 for breaking the golden rule.
User avatar
Rising Power
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 5:14 pm
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 44 times
Grassroots Team: Hectorville

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby LPH » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:18 pm

Got 3 games - appeal likely 8)
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:45 am
Location: Craven Cottage
Has liked: 541 times
Been liked: 326 times
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby gadj1976 » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:27 pm

LPH wrote:Got 3 games - appeal likely 8)


Diesel Williams would like to appeal the leniency too.
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9143
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 795 times
Been liked: 849 times

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby LPH » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:35 pm

Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:45 am
Location: Craven Cottage
Has liked: 541 times
Been liked: 326 times
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby Dutchy » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:32 pm

Ch9 covered the tribunal live in their news bulletin, of course talking about his potential no availability for the Power this weekend
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 44455
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2311 times
Been liked: 3482 times

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby CUTTERMAN » Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:11 am

"We get what we deserve"
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2954
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 213 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby stan » Wed Apr 22, 2015 7:42 am

At the end of the day you can't touch and umpire. We all know this. They are untouchable and there is a reason why. So really probably got what was expected.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15221
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1253 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby on the rails » Wed Apr 22, 2015 9:27 am

3 weeks seems harsh given the cicumstances in this case?
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby Hazydog » Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:47 am

on the rails wrote:3 weeks seems harsh given the cicumstances in this case?


Agreed - but I'm not sure where you draw the line when it comes to that sort of contact with an umpire. If a more leniant approach is taken this time - how do you judge the next case where contact is ever so slightly more robust, and so on...

It certainly sends a clear message.
Players win touches, Teams win matches, Clubs win Premierships.
User avatar
Hazydog
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Paralowie
Has liked: 115 times
Been liked: 190 times

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:50 am

Probably didn't deserve three games, but the tribunal would have felt a message needed to be sent, hence the penalty.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Postby Spargo » Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:31 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:Probably didn't deserve three games, but the tribunal would have felt a message needed to be sent, hence the penalty.

Spot on.
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ

Don’t lose your grip on the dreams of the past
You must fight just to keep them alive...
Spargo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15877
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:42 pm
Location: Getting out of Dodge
Has liked: 5457 times
Been liked: 5089 times
Grassroots Team: Sacred Heart OC

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |