by Footy Chick » Sun Sep 13, 2015 5:48 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by BenchedEagle » Sun Sep 13, 2015 7:29 pm
by no_remorse28 » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:18 am
by ezydoesitbigfella » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:42 am
Q. wrote:Failed Creation wrote:Q. wrote:Why did they only play with 17 in the field?
A Kilburn player got red-carded before half-time.
What for? Generally you can replace a red carded player, although it's at the umpires discretion. It's a very, very harsh penalty to make a team play with 17 for the majority of the game.
by beef » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:57 am
no_remorse28 wrote:Believe you will find people are saying salisbury did that, when 3 goals up witch a couple minutes left.
Seen a few posts on facies alleging that was the case.
Not kilburn
by Failed Creation » Mon Sep 14, 2015 10:16 am
ezydoesitbigfella wrote:Q. wrote:Failed Creation wrote:Q. wrote:Why did they only play with 17 in the field?
A Kilburn player got red-carded before half-time.
What for? Generally you can replace a red carded player, although it's at the umpires discretion. It's a very, very harsh penalty to make a team play with 17 for the majority of the game.
The maximum the TEAM can be penalised for a red card is TEN minutes - the reported player may not be able to play any further - but Kilburn would have only been down one player for TEN minutes.....that's the rule.
So at worst - they were down one rotation for a half of football.....
by Arch44 » Mon Sep 14, 2015 10:48 am
ezydoesitbigfella wrote:Q. wrote:Failed Creation wrote:Q. wrote:Why did they only play with 17 in the field?
A Kilburn player got red-carded before half-time.
What for? Generally you can replace a red carded player, although it's at the umpires discretion. It's a very, very harsh penalty to make a team play with 17 for the majority of the game.
The maximum the TEAM can be penalised for a red card is TEN minutes - the reported player may not be able to play any further - but Kilburn would have only been down one player for TEN minutes.....that's the rule.
So at worst - they were down one rotation for a half of football.....
by wonder_kid » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:07 am
by Mr Beefy » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:12 am
by wonder_kid » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:15 am
by Pag » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:20 am
by Arch44 » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:21 am
Mr Beefy wrote:If a Category “A” report is made by a field umpire the player shall be sent from the playing field for a minimum of ten (10) minutes or greater up to the maximum of the remainder of such match as determined by the reporting field umpire. The reporting umpire shall display a red card indicating that
a player has been reported for a Category “A” Offence. The field umpire shall escort the reported player from the field and inform the Interchange Steward of the details of the Category “A” report and the time imposed. The player may be replaced after ten (10) minutes of playing time.
by wonder_kid » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:22 am
by S Demon » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:42 am
Arch44 wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:If a Category “A” report is made by a field umpire the player shall be sent from the playing field for a minimum of ten (10) minutes or greater up to the maximum of the remainder of such match as determined by the reporting field umpire. The reporting umpire shall display a red card indicating that
a player has been reported for a Category “A” Offence. The field umpire shall escort the reported player from the field and inform the Interchange Steward of the details of the Category “A” report and the time imposed. The player may be replaced after ten (10) minutes of playing time.
Says MAY BE replaced that can create doubt whether actually can or can't.
by Q. » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:45 am
by wonder_kid » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:48 am
by Nearly Was » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:57 am
by Failed Creation » Mon Sep 14, 2015 12:01 pm
Pag wrote:I don't know about the Truscott red card and how long until he was replaced, but to anyone who thinks our A Grade was drinking alcohol in the last quarter while the game was in the balance is completely delusional. I would know, I was drinking from the said bottles during the game. Its good to see facts aren't getting in the way of the drunken rumours though.
Duncs, you clearly weren't at the game, if you were you would know that at no stage would anyone have said the game was done. Instead of relying on misinformation, if you wanted to get something as stupid as that confirmed or denied, how about just flicking us a PM instead of running with tripe?
Nearly Was wrote:Great battle on Saturday, I know Salisbury are bleeding but they had a great year and went up. The Kilburn boys were fantastic and never gave up. 4 Come from behind wins in the last 5 games, (Salisbury twice and North Haven amongst them) says plenty of our team.
by OnSong » Mon Sep 14, 2015 12:06 pm
by Footy Chick » Mon Sep 14, 2015 12:06 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |