by stan » Fri Dec 18, 2015 8:49 am
by Jim05 » Fri Dec 18, 2015 8:56 am
stan wrote:Careys from the old school in which he believes women should be in the kitchen
by Booney » Fri Dec 18, 2015 8:57 am
Jim05 wrote:stan wrote:Careys from the old school in which he believes women should be in the kitchen
I dont have a problem with it as long as the clubs can stand on their own two feet and not be a drain on the AFL.
I think the interest level will be fairly low hence why the games will be curtain raisers not stand alone games.
I personally wouldn't attend or watch but each to their own
by Jim05 » Fri Dec 18, 2015 9:02 am
Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:stan wrote:Careys from the old school in which he believes women should be in the kitchen
I dont have a problem with it as long as the clubs can stand on their own two feet and not be a drain on the AFL.
I think the interest level will be fairly low hence why the games will be curtain raisers not stand alone games.
I personally wouldn't attend or watch but each to their own
Drain on the AFL? Please, $1.something somthing billion goes a long, long way.
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Dec 18, 2015 9:18 am
stan wrote:Careys from the old school in which he believes women should be in the kitchen
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
by Magellan » Fri Dec 18, 2015 9:24 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:stan wrote:Careys from the old school in which he believes women should be in the kitchen
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
That's why they have small feet?
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Dec 18, 2015 9:30 am
Magellan wrote:Would make kicking a footy difficult.
by BZB27 » Sat Dec 19, 2015 10:58 pm
by Grahaml » Sun Dec 20, 2015 12:06 am
by daysofourlives » Sun Dec 20, 2015 8:58 am
Grahaml wrote:You'd think she couldn't be real keen if she wouldn't play for whoever gets the gig. Can't think the talk is hurting though and if it gets more women interested then the game just gets stronger.
Reckon regardless of what names the AFL manage to get committing, they'll go with the bid with the widest appeal.
by Jim05 » Sun Dec 20, 2015 9:10 am
daysofourlives wrote:Grahaml wrote:You'd think she couldn't be real keen if she wouldn't play for whoever gets the gig. Can't think the talk is hurting though and if it gets more women interested then the game just gets stronger.
Reckon regardless of what names the AFL manage to get committing, they'll go with the bid with the widest appeal.
That would have to be Port, they have a far younger demographic of supporter and are more likely to get behind a women's team
by daysofourlives » Sun Dec 20, 2015 9:34 am
Jim05 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Grahaml wrote:You'd think she couldn't be real keen if she wouldn't play for whoever gets the gig. Can't think the talk is hurting though and if it gets more women interested then the game just gets stronger.
Reckon regardless of what names the AFL manage to get committing, they'll go with the bid with the widest appeal.
That would have to be Port, they have a far younger demographic of supporter and are more likely to get behind a women's team
I think you are right but that's why the Crows would of approached the NT. A joint bid would be far more appealing to the AFL plus the AFL probably see the Crows as having the better finances to fund it.
by MW » Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:08 am
BZB27 wrote:Just saw on the afl app that the Crows and NT are going to do a joint bid amd to split up the home games between both locations.
Its also in response to Port annoucing Erin Phillips as there first player.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:11 am
MW wrote:BZB27 wrote:Just saw on the afl app that the Crows and NT are going to do a joint bid amd to split up the home games between both locations.
Its also in response to Port annoucing Erin Phillips as there first player.
Port announces Erin Philips in response to the Crows announcing their bid...
by stan » Mon Dec 21, 2015 11:44 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |