The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby Bounce of the ball » Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:56 pm

The birthday card sounds better though. I stopped listening to him on radio as he is pathetic . Is he still on ? He was on Sunday morning I think.

Dont listen to that station anymore as he was often on and haven't bought a paper because of his weak articles. He says nothing in any form.
Bounce of the ball
Reserves
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 10:10 am
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 65 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby Magellan » Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:18 pm

Grenville wrote:The Rucci autobiography would sound like a musical birthday card, as you turn every page it lets out a nonsensical whine.

Or one of those kid's books from the 70s/80s based on a movie that came with a tape/record, and when played it would make a sound to cue you to turn the page.

In Rucci's case the whiney noise would remind you to close his book, and hopefully return it to the place of purchase.
"Religion is like a blind man looking in a black room for a black cat that isn't there...and finding it." - Oscar Wilde
User avatar
Magellan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5981
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:04 pm
Location: Four Seasons Total Landscaping
Has liked: 757 times
Been liked: 1517 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby The Apostle » Sat Feb 27, 2016 9:28 am

Are Port supporters that retarded that they need a big sign at the Elizabeth train station telling them which way to go to get to Elizabeth Oval???
The Apostle
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 12:40 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby stan » Sat Feb 27, 2016 9:35 am

The Apostle wrote:Are Port supporters that retarded that they need a big sign at the Elizabeth train station telling them which way to go to get to Elizabeth Oval???

Not unless you want them to steal your phone to use the maps and gos function haha.

Call it crime reduction.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15221
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1253 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby Groucho » Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:06 pm

Good to see Melbourne named first on the scoreboard and using Central's bench and rooms. Well done Kris Grant. :D
User avatar
Groucho
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 731
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:04 am
Location: Hope Valley
Has liked: 106 times
Been liked: 160 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby Gozu » Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:19 pm

A couple of articles in the Ruccitiser on Thursday, the SA Football Commission is under pressure from the 8 'traditional' SANFL clubs to start charging the Power an annual licence to play in the SANFL. The Crows pay $400K a year ($50K to each club) where as Port don't pay anything being a founding member of the SANFL in 1877. Rucci says the 8 traditional SANFL clubs want to change the 15 year agreement they signed with the two AFL clubs in 2014. Rucci says financial pressure is mounting but then again one SANFL club is reportedly paying their coach at least $150K this year.

In the other article John Olsen has supposedly blocked a move from the SANFL league directors to re-negotiate the 15 year agreement with the two AFL clubs signed in 2014. "A deal is a deal" Olsen told the Advertiser. The Crows pay the SANFL $11.326 million across the 15 years to release it's AFL licence and then $400K a year to play in the SANFL. Port Adelaide pays the SANFL $6.985 million over the 15 years for their AFL licence and then nothing to play in the SANFL. The SANFL league directors want Port to pay the same as the Crows to play in the SANFL. SANFL chief executive Jake Parkinson says the Crows pay because they have use of the facilities at Football Park free of charge and Port does not pay because their SANFL side plays out of Alberton Oval. It's only 2 years into the 15 year agreement and that was pointed out to the SANFL league directors on Tuesday night and will not be revisited.

Said Parkinson "Some clubs are making year-after-year losses we have to face up to that. We have to grow revenue. But we also have to look at the cost base."
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13470
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 659 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby UK Fan » Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:25 pm

Gozu wrote:A couple of articles in the Ruccitiser on Thursday, the SA Football Commission is under pressure from the 8 'traditional' SANFL clubs to start charging the Power an annual licence to play in the SANFL. The Crows pay $400K a year ($50K to each club) where as Port don't pay anything being a founding member of the SANFL in 1877. Rucci says the 8 traditional SANFL clubs want to change the 15 year agreement they signed with the two AFL clubs in 2014. Rucci says financial pressure is mounting but then again one SANFL club is reportedly paying their coach at least $150K this year.

In the other article John Olsen has supposedly blocked a move from the SANFL league directors to re-negotiate the 15 year agreement with the two AFL clubs signed in 2014. "A deal is a deal" Olsen told the Advertiser. The Crows pay the SANFL $11.326 million across the 15 years to release it's AFL licence and then $400K a year to play in the SANFL. Port Adelaide pays the SANFL $6.985 million over the 15 years for their AFL licence and then nothing to play in the SANFL. The SANFL league directors want Port to pay the same as the Crows to play in the SANFL. SANFL chief executive Jake Parkinson says the Crows pay because they have use of the facilities at Football Park free of charge and Port does not pay because their SANFL side plays out of Alberton Oval. It's only 2 years into the 15 year agreement and that was pointed out to the SANFL league directors on Tuesday night and will not be revisited.

Said Parkinson "Some clubs are making year-after-year losses we have to face up to that. We have to grow revenue. But we also have to look at the cost base."


So we can't even trust Olsen on terms to be "reviewed" annually.


I miss Whicker he'd of called bullshit to the entire operation upfront.

Olsen = clueless sell out
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5642
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1197 times
Been liked: 500 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby Gozu » Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:30 pm

UK Fan wrote:So we can't even trust Olsen on terms to be "reviewed" annually.


I miss Whicker he'd of called bullshit to the entire operation upfront.

Olsen = clueless sell out


“Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable – that will not be part of our discussions on the licences, We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams).”

"A deal is a deal."
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13470
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 659 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby Pseudo » Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:42 pm

If the brainstrusts of the respective 8 sovereign clubs had any balls then they'd simply forfeit the games against the smearpies this season. "They don't pay, we won't play".
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11773
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1553 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby tipper » Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:58 pm

"a deal is a deal"

wait, how many times did the sanfl and Port Adelaide renegotiate their stadium deals??
tipper
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2854
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:45 am
Has liked: 359 times
Been liked: 531 times
Grassroots Team: Peake

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby stan » Sat Feb 27, 2016 9:20 pm

UK Fan wrote:
Gozu wrote:A couple of articles in the Ruccitiser on Thursday, the SA Football Commission is under pressure from the 8 'traditional' SANFL clubs to start charging the Power an annual licence to play in the SANFL. The Crows pay $400K a year ($50K to each club) where as Port don't pay anything being a founding member of the SANFL in 1877. Rucci says the 8 traditional SANFL clubs want to change the 15 year agreement they signed with the two AFL clubs in 2014. Rucci says financial pressure is mounting but then again one SANFL club is reportedly paying their coach at least $150K this year.

In the other article John Olsen has supposedly blocked a move from the SANFL league directors to re-negotiate the 15 year agreement with the two AFL clubs signed in 2014. "A deal is a deal" Olsen told the Advertiser. The Crows pay the SANFL $11.326 million across the 15 years to release it's AFL licence and then $400K a year to play in the SANFL. Port Adelaide pays the SANFL $6.985 million over the 15 years for their AFL licence and then nothing to play in the SANFL. The SANFL league directors want Port to pay the same as the Crows to play in the SANFL. SANFL chief executive Jake Parkinson says the Crows pay because they have use of the facilities at Football Park free of charge and Port does not pay because their SANFL side plays out of Alberton Oval. It's only 2 years into the 15 year agreement and that was pointed out to the SANFL league directors on Tuesday night and will not be revisited.

Said Parkinson "Some clubs are making year-after-year losses we have to face up to that. We have to grow revenue. But we also have to look at the cost base."


So we can't even trust Olsen on terms to be "reviewed" annually.


I miss Whicker he'd of called bullshit to the entire operation upfront.

Olsen = clueless sell out

John Olsen. The former premier who resigned mid term after some below board deals. And then you said something about trust. ....
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15221
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1253 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby Reddeer » Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:53 pm

Pseudo wrote:If the brainstrusts of the respective 8 sovereign clubs had any balls then they'd simply forfeit the games against the smearpies this season. "They don't pay, we won't play".

That is what should happen really but it wont because the powers that be are all gutless wonders and you couldn't trust Olsen EVER
Verschrikkelyk!!
Reddeer
Reserves
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:32 pm
Has liked: 28 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby UK Fan » Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:51 am

Gozu wrote:A couple of articles in the Ruccitiser on Thursday, the SA Football Commission is under pressure from the 8 'traditional' SANFL clubs to start charging the Power an annual licence to play in the SANFL. The Crows pay $400K a year ($50K to each club) where as Port don't pay anything being a founding member of the SANFL in 1877. Rucci says the 8 traditional SANFL clubs want to change the 15 year agreement they signed with the two AFL clubs in 2014. Rucci says financial pressure is mounting but then again one SANFL club is reportedly paying their coach at least $150K this year.

In the other article John Olsen has supposedly blocked a move from the SANFL league directors to re-negotiate the 15 year agreement with the two AFL clubs signed in 2014. "A deal is a deal" Olsen told the Advertiser. The Crows pay the SANFL $11.326 million across the 15 years to release it's AFL licence and then $400K a year to play in the SANFL. Port Adelaide pays the SANFL $6.985 million over the 15 years for their AFL licence and then nothing to play in the SANFL. The SANFL league directors want Port to pay the same as the Crows to play in the SANFL. SANFL chief executive Jake Parkinson says the Crows pay because they have use of the facilities at Football Park free of charge and Port does not pay because their SANFL side plays out of Alberton Oval. It's only 2 years into the 15 year agreement and that was pointed out to the SANFL league directors on Tuesday night and will not be revisited.

Said Parkinson "Some clubs are making year-after-year losses we have to face up to that. We have to grow revenue. But we also have to look at the cost base."



So Olsen finally confesses afl reserves has something to do with the sale of afl licences and nothing to do with helping SA football.

What are the AFL gonna do sell them back.

Useless spineless bunch of chigwiddens that run our league.

No wonder the real SANFL fans have left
Last edited by UK Fan on Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5642
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1197 times
Been liked: 500 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby teaoby » Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:05 am

The Crows might pay the $400k but the SANFL pay close to $500k to the Crows to maintain Footy Park!
beards dont kill people, people with beards kill people
User avatar
teaoby
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 919
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:10 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 11 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby Killa » Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:23 pm

teaoby wrote:The Crows might pay the $400k but the SANFL pay close to $500k to the Crows to maintain Footy Park!

Crows are paying maintenance cost of footy park via $11.326 million across the 15 years to release it's AFL licence from the SANFL.
Killa
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:43 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: South Augusta

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby VALE PARK » Tue Mar 08, 2016 6:21 pm

If you do the sums on those figures the SANFL sold the licence for less that 4 million net after it maintains Footy park.
Did the SANFL get a good deal done?
VALE PARK
Under 18s
 
Posts: 660
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:32 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 59 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby Hazydog » Wed Mar 16, 2016 3:33 pm

This thread needs a nudge.. Crows going to be very hard to beat in the first few rounds having a full squad, bar one, available in Round 1.

Not sure how many on their list (including Rookies) - Captain might not get a game??
Players win touches, Teams win matches, Clubs win Premierships.
User avatar
Hazydog
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Paralowie
Has liked: 115 times
Been liked: 190 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby Magellan » Wed Mar 16, 2016 3:57 pm

Hazydog wrote:Crows going to be very hard to beat in the first few rounds having a full squad, bar one, available in Round 1.

If that's the case then there's no excuse for Crows fans to not come out and support their 'club', especially since their A-grade side will be struggling to cope with a difficult draw. And because they share the pride, or something. And passion, perhaps.

Can't wait for some record attendances.
"Religion is like a blind man looking in a black room for a black cat that isn't there...and finding it." - Oscar Wilde
User avatar
Magellan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5981
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:04 pm
Location: Four Seasons Total Landscaping
Has liked: 757 times
Been liked: 1517 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby Hazydog » Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:41 pm

That's not going to happen. If ever they were going to get any decent support it would have been while there was a novelty factor. Other than tge Walker game it hasn't happened- and won't. Maybe playing more country games would get a few more out to support them- but that doesn't really help the SANFL clubs
Players win touches, Teams win matches, Clubs win Premierships.
User avatar
Hazydog
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Paralowie
Has liked: 115 times
Been liked: 190 times

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Postby sib » Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:10 pm

The problem is that people like me who love the crows also love an SANFL club. Me being Norwood. Therefore I find myself supporting both teams in the SANFL. The best thing would be for Port and Adelaide to join the VFL. The fact that someone can support two teams shows the joke the SANFL has become.
sib
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:29 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 22 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

cron