HFL Division 1 (Central)

Talk on any country footy league or club from the SA Country area

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby oneuponedown » Mon Mar 21, 2016 9:49 am

Caught the Blackwood vs Flagstaff Hill trial game on Sat.
Looked like being a cracker game in the 1st quarter then Blackwood played all over Flagstaff for the last 3 Quarters.
Didn't expect a 90 point flogging though. :shock:

Blackwood look a good side in 2016, well drilled, good press and some talent across all lines.
They seem to of picked up some new players this year? 17, 31, 4, and a big fella at CHB.

Flagstaff looked a little lost after 1/4 time, not sure how many out but I could only see 3 -4 regulars not there in A.carey (cricket) M carey, Raitt, Vanders missing.
oneuponedown
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 7:20 am
Has liked: 33 times
Been liked: 8 times
Grassroots Team: Meningie

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby Down the Hill » Mon Mar 21, 2016 10:05 am

If Alex Carey gets a SACA contract for next season (which he should) I doubt he will be playing for Flaggies in 2016.

Thanks to Lobethal for the heading down to Brighton for a trial on Saturday. Really good hit out for both clubs having their first trial. Brighton had several very good players missing due to a wedding and cricket and I believe Lobies were also missing a few. Brighton won the B grade by 5 or 6 goals and also won the A grade by 9 points but Lobies played most of the 2nd half with 16 due to only starting with a small bench and copping a few injuries (nothing serious) so Brighton dropped back to 17 during that same period.
User avatar
Down the Hill
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1445
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 3:36 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 276 times
Grassroots Team: Brighton District & OS

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby oneuponedown » Mon Mar 21, 2016 10:11 am

Down the Hill wrote:If Alex Carey gets a SACA contract for next season (which he should) I doubt he will be playing for Flaggies in 2016.

Thanks to Lobethal for the heading down to Brighton for a trial on Saturday. Really good hit out for both clubs having their first trial. Brighton had several very good players missing due to a wedding and cricket and I believe Lobies were also missing a few. Brighton won the B grade by 5 or 6 goals and also won the A grade by 9 points but Lobies played most of the 2nd half with 16 due to only starting with a small bench and copping a few injuries (nothing serious) so Brighton dropped back to 17 during that same period.


I agree on A Carey , was talking to some Flagstaff people Sat, they are not expecting him back anytime soon.
oneuponedown
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 7:20 am
Has liked: 33 times
Been liked: 8 times
Grassroots Team: Meningie

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby Dutchy » Mon Mar 21, 2016 10:58 am

Was a bit surprised u15's in the HFL still use a synthetic undersized ball, has this always been the case?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 44518
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2322 times
Been liked: 3496 times

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby cracka » Mon Mar 21, 2016 3:16 pm

Dutchy wrote:Was a bit surprised u15's in the HFL still use a synthetic undersized ball, has this always been the case?

Yep. Its purely a cost issue. IMO that age should be using the leather ball.
cracka
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3665
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:41 am
Has liked: 461 times
Been liked: 566 times
Grassroots Team: Onkaparinga Valley

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby chopper7 » Mon Mar 21, 2016 3:38 pm

Down the Hill wrote:If Alex Carey gets a SACA contract for next season (which he should) I doubt he will be playing for Flaggies in 2016.

Thanks to Lobethal for the heading down to Brighton for a trial on Saturday. Really good hit out for both clubs having their first trial. Brighton had several very good players missing due to a wedding and cricket and I believe Lobies were also missing a few. Brighton won the B grade by 5 or 6 goals and also won the A grade by 9 points but Lobies played most of the 2nd half with 16 due to only starting with a small bench and copping a few injuries (nothing serious) so Brighton dropped back to 17 during that same period.



Was definitely a good hit out for both sides, thanks Brighton for having the Tigers down there. Lobethal ended up fielding only 15 in the last 1/4 so was a pretty good effort to hang within 8 points of a classy side like Brighton. The 3v6 forward line for the Tigers held up well haha. Loby has about 8 or so to come back into the As and should be there come the next trail against Kilburn at Loby. Unfortunately one of the injuries was pretty serious with one of the young fellas tearing his ACL, devastated to have done it this time of year after having a huge pre season. All the best to Brighton throughout the year as well
chopper7
Under 16s
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:24 pm
Has liked: 47 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby reppoh_eht » Mon Mar 21, 2016 3:53 pm

oneuponedown wrote:Caught the Blackwood vs Flagstaff Hill trial game on Sat.
Looked like being a cracker game in the 1st quarter then Blackwood played all over Flagstaff for the last 3 Quarters.
Didn't expect a 90 point flogging though. :shock:

Blackwood look a good side in 2016, well drilled, good press and some talent across all lines.
They seem to of picked up some new players this year? 17, 31, 4, and a big fella at CHB.

Flagstaff looked a little lost after 1/4 time, not sure how many out but I could only see 3 -4 regulars not there in A.carey (cricket) M carey, Raitt, Vanders missing.


Flaggies were pretty dissapointed with how they played after qtr time. One thing to note was Blackwood played 32 and Flaggies only 24, so they had fresh legs for majority of the day. It was also Flaggies first hit out, and you could tell that was the case with a lot of rust being on show.

Quick turnaround for us though, with a 6 qtr trial on Wednesday night. Thanks to Blackwood for hosting a quality day out.
reppoh_eht
Under 16s
 
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 11:24 pm
Has liked: 131 times
Been liked: 54 times

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby Dutchy » Mon Mar 21, 2016 9:30 pm

cracka wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Was a bit surprised u15's in the HFL still use a synthetic undersized ball, has this always been the case?

Yep. Its purely a cost issue. IMO that age should be using the leather ball.


So you have kids heading into u17's who have never played with a leather full sized ball?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 44518
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2322 times
Been liked: 3496 times

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby Down the Hill » Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:52 pm

cracka wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Was a bit surprised u15's in the HFL still use a synthetic undersized ball, has this always been the case?

Yep. Its purely a cost issue. IMO that age should be using the leather ball.


Cost issue? Several Hills Clubs would have spent $40,000 plus on player payments in recent years and will spend the limit under the new rules yet can't "afford" to pay the difference for a maximum of 2 leather size 4 Match balls compared to synthetic balls. If the reason was the wet and muddy conditions encountered in the Hills FL coupled with the early start time for U15 then fair enough, but if it is truly a cost issue then the clubs and the HFL must be kidding themselves.
User avatar
Down the Hill
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1445
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 3:36 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 276 times
Grassroots Team: Brighton District & OS

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby cracka » Tue Mar 22, 2016 6:17 am

Dutchy wrote:
cracka wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Was a bit surprised u15's in the HFL still use a synthetic undersized ball, has this always been the case?

Yep. Its purely a cost issue. IMO that age should be using the leather ball.


So you have kids heading into u17's who have never played with a leather full sized ball?

Yep, ridiculous really.
cracka
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3665
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:41 am
Has liked: 461 times
Been liked: 566 times
Grassroots Team: Onkaparinga Valley

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby cracka » Tue Mar 22, 2016 6:21 am

Down the Hill wrote:
cracka wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Was a bit surprised u15's in the HFL still use a synthetic undersized ball, has this always been the case?

Yep. Its purely a cost issue. IMO that age should be using the leather ball.


Cost issue? Several Hills Clubs would have spent $40,000 plus on player payments in recent years and will spend the limit under the new rules yet can't "afford" to pay the difference for a maximum of 2 leather size 4 Match balls compared to synthetic balls. If the reason was the wet and muddy conditions encountered in the Hills FL coupled with the early start time for U15 then fair enough, but if it is truly a cost issue then the clubs and the HFL must be kidding themselves.

Sorry, forgot about the wet muddy ground argument, which was also mentioned. This was about 4 years ago when it was discussed so my memory of it isn't the best. The cost issue argument came from clubs in div 2 who were struggling for junior numbers.
cracka
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3665
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:41 am
Has liked: 461 times
Been liked: 566 times
Grassroots Team: Onkaparinga Valley

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby Grumpy Old B » Tue Mar 22, 2016 1:21 pm

A couple of interesting trials tomorrow night
Onkas playing Nairne at Ram Park. will be interested in the outcome as both clubs have different agenda's this year
Hahndorf are hosts to Mypolonga. Both clubs will be forces in there respective comps and would want a decent hit out
The summer sports are now over so its time for business.
Grumpy Old B
Member
 
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:47 am
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 8 times

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby footytragic001971 » Tue Mar 22, 2016 2:05 pm

onkas and nairne have different agendas???
don't they both want to win lots of games??
footytragic001971
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:28 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 10 times

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby Grumpy Old B » Tue Mar 22, 2016 3:12 pm

footytragic001971 wrote:onkas and nairne have different agendas???
don't they both want to win lots of games??

Everyone is out to win
BUT
Onkas would like to get off the bottom
And Nairne need to win a GF
BUT Nairne have to overcome Bridgy who have Craig Evans back home and he will dominate Div 2
Grumpy Old B
Member
 
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:47 am
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 8 times

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby The Cloak » Wed Mar 23, 2016 11:23 pm

Just catching up on the forum and see Nairne has been mentioned several times .... They need to prove themselves by winning a GF before being mentioned on the Div 1 thread !

Interesting article in the Courier today about the new sports centre proposal in Mt Barker .... Not sure which was the bigger joke, the lack of car parking for a 4,000 spectator stadium or the reference about who the project was being mainly driven by ! (Bloke Who obviously doesn't know how to use a paintbrush or hire someone that does based on the current 3rd world facilities). .. Other communities are required to fundraise and fight for facility upgrades but Mt Barker expect theirs to be handed out in a plate at the expense of council rate & tax payers ....
The Cloak
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:48 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Coober Pedy

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby footytragic001971 » Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:19 am

Did anyone see the Hahndorf v Mypo trial last night.
footytragic001971
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:28 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 10 times

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby chopper7 » Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:19 am

footytragic001971 wrote:Did anyone see the Hahndorf v Mypo trial last night.


Yeah mate, was a 6 quarter game and I watched the first 5. Hahndorfs Bs did it easy in the first 3 quarters. The A grade was very very scrappy. Interesting to see Handby and Wittwer both played last night. Brad Dubious played in the early 3 quarters, correct me if I'm wrong but the only few no notables that were missing were Luke Roberts, Jaensch, J Male and Tripodi. Not sure what the final score was though sorry.
chopper7
Under 16s
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:24 pm
Has liked: 47 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby footytragic001971 » Thu Mar 24, 2016 11:04 am

"only four"

Gee wiz they are a reasonable 4 aren't they??
footytragic001971
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:28 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 10 times

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby chopper7 » Thu Mar 24, 2016 12:23 pm

footytragic001971 wrote:"only four"

Gee wiz they are a reasonable 4 aren't they??


I never mentioned the quality of player footytragic, I meant only 4 as in the numbers of players missing from the side.
chopper7
Under 16s
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:24 pm
Has liked: 47 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: HFL Division 1 (Central)

Postby footytragic001971 » Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:54 am

I assume this weekend is the last round of trial games for teams.
Anyone know who all the teams are playing???
footytragic001971
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:28 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 10 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  Country Footy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], jackpot jim and 15 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |