by Dutchy » Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:12 pm
by therisingblues » Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:33 pm
Dutchy wrote:
However, as the SANFL takes on the challenge of managing its fixture around the AFL program, Olsen did warn the clubs against blaming the Adelaide Oval phenomenon for disappointing crowd figures at state league games in Adelaide’s suburbia.
“Rather than blame Adelaide Oval for drawing fans to the AFL games, we need to embrace the Oval - more so when 75 per cent of the revenue the Oval generates for the SANFL goes to game development,” in what is now a serious business.”
by Dogs72 » Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:52 pm
by RB » Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:58 pm
Dutchy wrote:HOLD the two AFL reserves teams from Port Adelaide and the Crows. “That is not negotiable - we have deal with the AFL clubs and they will be there for the next 10 years,” Olsen said. “The SANFL competition is better with them in - that is my strong view.”
by Magellan » Tue Jul 05, 2016 12:12 am
by southee » Tue Jul 05, 2016 12:20 am
Dogs72 wrote:If this peanuts strong belief is the SANFL is better with the (the all teams) in, then can he please explain to the majority of us WHY? What leads to this strong belief? Is it tweets and website hits? My strong belief is they add nothing to the SANFL competition.
I think I'm just about done, had enough. They're not listening. In some small way, now I almost wish my club had voted yes, then I could comfortably walk away. Torn, I have to stick with them.
Stuff you other piss weak boards.
by Dutchy » Tue Jul 05, 2016 12:50 am
by CUTTERMAN » Tue Jul 05, 2016 2:09 am
Dutchy wrote:The commission is backed into a corner now, they have no choice but to back in the AFL teams, I get that. However PLEASE just admit what the problem is and do something pro-active about it. Denial, pure and simple.
by Pseudo » Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:31 am
RB wrote:Dutchy wrote:HOLD the two AFL reserves teams from Port Adelaide and the Crows. “That is not negotiable - we have deal with the AFL clubs and they will be there for the next 10 years,” Olsen said. “The SANFL competition is better with them in - that is my strong view.”
And there you have it - this is why the SANFL's ******.
by Pseudo » Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:34 am
Magellan wrote:If every sovereign SANFL club supporter boycotted Crows and Port reserves games such that the only people in attendance were a handful of AFL fans and respective club officials etc, you can be sure something would be done about it well before the end of Olsen's 10 year timeframe.
by Wedgie » Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:07 am
by JK » Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:18 am
Wedgie wrote:Double the money to bribe the clubs into keeping the AFL teams. It's pretty obvious they now just want to prop up some clubs so the AFL reserves have someone to play.
RIP SANFL.
by Spargo » Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:29 am
Pseudo wrote:Magellan wrote:If every sovereign SANFL club supporter boycotted Crows and Port reserves games such that the only people in attendance were a handful of AFL fans and respective club officials etc, you can be sure something would be done about it well before the end of Olsen's 10 year timeframe.
I have NEVER attended one and NEVER will.
by Wedgie » Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:32 am
by tipper » Tue Jul 05, 2016 10:23 am
Wedgie wrote:Double the money to bribe the clubs into keeping the AFL teams. It's pretty obvious they now just want to prop up some clubs so the AFL reserves have someone to play.
RIP SANFL.
by UK Fan » Tue Jul 05, 2016 10:48 am
RB wrote:Dutchy wrote:HOLD the two AFL reserves teams from Port Adelaide and the Crows. “That is not negotiable - we have deal with the AFL clubs and they will be there for the next 10 years,” Olsen said. “The SANFL competition is better with them in - that is my strong view.”
And there you have it - this is why the SANFL's ******.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by stan » Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:06 am
Wedgie wrote:Whoever helped Olsen get in charge should be shot. He'll be remembered as the man that killed the SANFL.
by stan » Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:09 am
Wedgie wrote:Double the money to bribe the clubs into keeping the AFL teams. It's pretty obvious they now just want to prop up some clubs so the AFL reserves have someone to play.
RIP SANFL.
by Wedgie » Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:49 am
therisingblues wrote:Dutchy wrote:
However, as the SANFL takes on the challenge of managing its fixture around the AFL program, Olsen did warn the clubs against blaming the Adelaide Oval phenomenon for disappointing crowd figures at state league games in Adelaide’s suburbia.
“Rather than blame Adelaide Oval for drawing fans to the AFL games, we need to embrace the Oval - more so when 75 per cent of the revenue the Oval generates for the SANFL goes to game development,” in what is now a serious business.”
Blaming Adelaide Oval? Dude we have a hundred plus page thread screaming that the reason for falling crowds is the inclusion of reserves teams in the competition. AREN'T YOU LISTENING?
by darley16 » Tue Jul 05, 2016 12:05 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |