by human_torpedo » Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:23 pm
by Footy Chick » Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:33 pm
zedman wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Dols wrote:the SAAFL should not get that call. There should not be different rules for different divisions.Down the Hill wrote:Win the GF and you will get promoted!!!
Div 4 GF teams since 2013 reads like this.
2013 - Plympton 1st promoted to Div 3, Brahma Lodge 2nd and elected to be dropped to A5 and went winless.
2014 - GG 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury West 2nd and elected to be dropped to A7 and won 5 games
2015 - Kilburn 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury 2nd and elected to stay in Div 4 and still a chance to challenge for a flag.
The runners up have made their own call for the past 3 years so the only difference this year is that the SAAFL has made the call for them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actually the SAAFL clubs made the call. 90% of the clubs voted yes
thats because 90% of the clubs arent affected by it this year..do the maths..
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Burras » Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:34 pm
zedman wrote:im sure all the teams in div 6 will be rapt if WCFC lose the GF and they get to have their asses handed to them for another 18 rounds in 2017..this affects many clubs not just the losing finalists and its the same in div 5 and div 4..but hey..its all about the SFL clubs..
by zedman » Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:34 pm
human_torpedo wrote:As opposed to allowing the SFL clubs into div 7 and having years of uneven competitions until they reach their respective rightful divisions?
Cant please every one Zed. But what would you know, you only coach an A grade side not run the football club hey Old Farmer? So steady on a bit Old Farmer, your mob are likely to host an elimination final next week, possibly against Trinity, so step down off that high horse mate
by The Bedge » Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:36 pm
zedman wrote:im sure all the teams in div 6 will be rapt if WCFC lose the GF and they get to have their asses handed to them for another 18 rounds in 2017..this affects many clubs not just the losing finalists and its the same in div 5 and div 4..but hey..its all about the SFL clubs..
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Bedge » Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:36 pm
old farmer wrote:i know what i mean because i run a football club, not coach B Grade
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by zedman » Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:37 pm
Burras wrote:zedman wrote:im sure all the teams in div 6 will be rapt if WCFC lose the GF and they get to have their asses handed to them for another 18 rounds in 2017..this affects many clubs not just the losing finalists and its the same in div 5 and div 4..but hey..its all about the SFL clubs..
They would probably feel the same as all the Div 7 clubs that are getting their asses handed to them by Salisbury West, the club who nominated not to go up a grade..........
by Footy Chick » Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:39 pm
zedman wrote:
correct, its wrong..so who is to blame for that? the saafl, the club or the guy on the grassy knoll..
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by jo172 » Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:09 pm
by The Bedge » Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:12 pm
jo172 wrote:Being promoted without winning a Grand Final is heavily overrated in my view in any event.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by jo172 » Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:14 pm
Zartan wrote:jo172 wrote:Being promoted without winning a Grand Final is heavily overrated in my view in any event.
Finishing 3rd and being promoted ALA Kilburn when Towns left for SFL is more over rated IMO
by Footy Chick » Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:31 pm
Zartan wrote:jo172 wrote:Being promoted without winning a Grand Final is heavily overrated in my view in any event.
Finishing 3rd and being promoted ALA Kilburn when Towns left for SFL is more over rated IMO
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by WOS Dragons » Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:44 pm
by The Bedge » Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:46 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by morell » Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:57 pm
Absurd.WOS Dragons wrote:Our clubs position, as raised on Monday night, is that the grand finalists should go up and the bottom 3 go down. This was based on the idea that you reward a successful season over a poor season. The saafl promotion / relegation system is great with the grand final representing club success a the gf being more for the players. Now it's all on the line in one game. I welcome expansion but believe the decision rewards the wrong clubs.
by Trader » Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:10 pm
morell wrote:Absurd.WOS Dragons wrote:Our clubs position, as raised on Monday night, is that the grand finalists should go up and the bottom 3 go down. This was based on the idea that you reward a successful season over a poor season. The saafl promotion / relegation system is great with the grand final representing club success a the gf being more for the players. Now it's all on the line in one game. I welcome expansion but believe the decision rewards the wrong clubs.
by morell » Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:37 pm
by WOS Dragons » Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:40 pm
by Wazz17 » Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:55 pm
by heater31 » Wed Aug 03, 2016 6:01 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |