by woodublieve12 » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:30 pm
by inside word » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:32 pm
Magellan wrote:inside word wrote:Here come the haters, the point of Marriage is to procreate, I don't think you can do that if you don't have a man and a woman? Or have I been wrong all this time?
If that's the case then you would agree with the proposition that the Marriage Act should compel married people to have kids, and make it a criminal offense to get married and not have children, no?
by inside word » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:33 pm
by tipper » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:34 pm
inside word wrote:Magellan wrote:inside word wrote:Here come the haters, the point of Marriage is to procreate, I don't think you can do that if you don't have a man and a woman? Or have I been wrong all this time?
If that's the case then you would agree with the proposition that the Marriage Act should compel married people to have kids, and make it a criminal offense to get married and not have children, no?
Of course not, there are factors as why people don't want to, I guess I should've worded it better, Marriage should give you an option to procreate, same sex people can't...
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:36 pm
by Wedgie » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:37 pm
by tipper » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:37 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:I got married once because I felt as though that I had to and it seemed like the right thing to do.
I will probably get married again, this time because I want to though.
by inside word » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:38 pm
by tipper » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:38 pm
Wedgie wrote:Can we stop Crows supporters from procreating? Surely Federal Parliament would agree to that!
by Magellan » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:38 pm
inside word wrote:Magellan wrote:inside word wrote:Here come the haters, the point of Marriage is to procreate, I don't think you can do that if you don't have a man and a woman? Or have I been wrong all this time?
If that's the case then you would agree with the proposition that the Marriage Act should compel married people to have kids, and make it a criminal offense to get married and not have children, no?
Of course not, there are factors as why people don't want to, I guess I should've worded it better, Marriage should give you an option to procreate, same sex people can't...
by tipper » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:43 pm
inside word wrote:Tipper can I have the view that it's not normal and a little disgusting? Why am I not allowed to think that?
by Magellan » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:43 pm
inside word wrote:Tipper can I have the view that it's not normal and a little disgusting? Why am I not allowed to think that?
by Booney » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:44 pm
inside word wrote:One thing that really irritates me about this debate is, if you're against it you're chastised for it! it's people's right to not like it, I for one am in that camp. Don't like it, so I should be allowed to think that, after all, the minority is causing this issue, since when do we give into the minority?
by woodublieve12 » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:45 pm
inside word wrote:Magellan wrote:inside word wrote:Here come the haters, the point of Marriage is to procreate, I don't think you can do that if you don't have a man and a woman? Or have I been wrong all this time?
If that's the case then you would agree with the proposition that the Marriage Act should compel married people to have kids, and make it a criminal offense to get married and not have children, no?
Of course not, there are factors as why people don't want to, I guess I should've worded it better, Marriage should give you an option to procreate, same sex people can't...
by Booney » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:47 pm
inside word wrote:Tipper can I have the view that it's not normal and a little disgusting? Why am I not allowed to think that?
by inside word » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:47 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:inside word wrote:Magellan wrote:inside word wrote:Here come the haters, the point of Marriage is to procreate, I don't think you can do that if you don't have a man and a woman? Or have I been wrong all this time?
If that's the case then you would agree with the proposition that the Marriage Act should compel married people to have kids, and make it a criminal offense to get married and not have children, no?
Of course not, there are factors as why people don't want to, I guess I should've worded it better, Marriage should give you an option to procreate, same sex people can't...
Lesbian couple I know had triplets last year. Pretty sure they can
by inside word » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:48 pm
Booney wrote:inside word wrote:Tipper can I have the view that it's not normal and a little disgusting? Why am I not allowed to think that?
You can think that. That's your choice mate.
What gives you the right to tell someone what they can and cant do though?
by Wedgie » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:48 pm
inside word wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Lesbian couple I know had triplets last year. Pretty sure they can
So they did it without the help of science? That's amazing!
by Magellan » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:49 pm
by Booney » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:50 pm
inside word wrote:Booney wrote:inside word wrote:Tipper can I have the view that it's not normal and a little disgusting? Why am I not allowed to think that?
You can think that. That's your choice mate.
What gives you the right to tell someone what they can and cant do though?
Free speech? Or do we live in Iraq?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |