by Grumpy Old B » Mon Sep 19, 2016 9:56 am
by footytragic001971 » Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:08 am
by wazzal77 » Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:20 am
footytragic001971 wrote:Well that was an excellent finish to the season.
Hats of to Hahndorf for being able to win 5 out of 6 premierships.
Did anyone see that last quarter coming from their A grade.
An extraordinary turn around!!
by cracka » Tue Sep 20, 2016 8:31 pm
by herewegoagain » Tue Sep 20, 2016 9:20 pm
by footytragic001971 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 4:01 pm
by Corona Man » Wed Sep 21, 2016 5:15 pm
footytragic001971 wrote:Now that the season is over, let the silly season begin.
Anyone heard any player movement rumours.
Anyone heard and coaching movement rumours.
The sillier the better I say!!
by footytragic001971 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 5:22 pm
by Corona Man » Wed Sep 21, 2016 5:27 pm
footytragic001971 wrote:Maybe drinking too much of your own product corona!!
Having said that, who won the wooden spoon in 2014??
Wasn't it the back to back premier?
by Elmer J Thudpucker » Wed Sep 21, 2016 5:34 pm
Corona Man wrote:footytragic001971 wrote:Now that the season is over, let the silly season begin.
Anyone heard any player movement rumours.
Anyone heard and coaching movement rumours.
The sillier the better I say!!
Echunga to win the 2017 Premiership!
by Corona Man » Wed Sep 21, 2016 5:36 pm
Elmer J Thudpucker wrote:Corona Man wrote:footytragic001971 wrote:Now that the season is over, let the silly season begin.
Anyone heard any player movement rumours.
Anyone heard and coaching movement rumours.
The sillier the better I say!!
Echunga to win the 2017 Premiership!
Cant see them finishing above Bridgewater, Kersbrook or Birdwood.
I assume you were talking about Div 2 premiership ??
by wazzal77 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:12 pm
by cracka » Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:53 pm
wazzal77 wrote:We are assuming of course that there will be a board around to run the Hills Football League... Looks a bit thin on the ground - I was a bit shocked to see the board at the game on Saturday - shocked in that there wasnt many of them and without sound rude they are getting on a bit. I give them all credit for their devotion, but gee surely the clubs have some retired people in their circles that they could put forward? Maybe every club should be asked to find and nominate a person to put up on the board and then everyone votes. That would mean around 18 options...?? Or is that just too simplistic?
by TooNice » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:18 pm
by The Gimp » Fri Sep 23, 2016 3:21 pm
TooNice wrote:Despite the controversies late in the season, Hills League Board have done a great job running the comp. Only have to see the professionalism of the finals series in both divisions to see that.
Trouble with running a league though, is that there are extremely passionate people from extremely passionate clubs that magnify every little miss step made. The finals permit saga is a good example of this. A small governance slip up caused a major issue, and resignations and so on. Steady thoughtful people are required on the board. Club "Barrackers" would not be a good thing. The question would be weather the clubs would pursue individual club interest - or overall league health interest.
by cracka » Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:06 pm
The Gimp wrote:TooNice wrote:Despite the controversies late in the season, Hills League Board have done a great job running the comp. Only have to see the professionalism of the finals series in both divisions to see that.
Trouble with running a league though, is that there are extremely passionate people from extremely passionate clubs that magnify every little miss step made. The finals permit saga is a good example of this. A small governance slip up caused a major issue, and resignations and so on. Steady thoughtful people are required on the board. Club "Barrackers" would not be a good thing. The question would be weather the clubs would pursue individual club interest - or overall league health interest.
This is surely a p1ss take!!
These "small governance slip-ups" are consistently happening by the same few and doesn't look like improving any time soon.
No doubt club personnel pursue club interest which is not always for the betterment of the league - but this is what they are elected to do by their club members.
The HFL board members are elected to do what is best for the league in total - not any individual club - which is what seems to happen at times.
by hollywood7477 » Mon Sep 26, 2016 4:49 pm
by The Gimp » Mon Sep 26, 2016 5:17 pm
cracka wrote:The Gimp wrote:TooNice wrote:Despite the controversies late in the season, Hills League Board have done a great job running the comp. Only have to see the professionalism of the finals series in both divisions to see that.
Trouble with running a league though, is that there are extremely passionate people from extremely passionate clubs that magnify every little miss step made. The finals permit saga is a good example of this. A small governance slip up caused a major issue, and resignations and so on. Steady thoughtful people are required on the board. Club "Barrackers" would not be a good thing. The question would be weather the clubs would pursue individual club interest - or overall league health interest.
This is surely a p1ss take!!
These "small governance slip-ups" are consistently happening by the same few and doesn't look like improving any time soon.
No doubt club personnel pursue club interest which is not always for the betterment of the league - but this is what they are elected to do by their club members.
The HFL board members are elected to do what is best for the league in total - not any individual club - which is what seems to happen at times.
Put your hand up then if you're not happy with how its run.
by cracka » Mon Sep 26, 2016 7:48 pm
The Gimp wrote:cracka wrote:The Gimp wrote:TooNice wrote:Despite the controversies late in the season, Hills League Board have done a great job running the comp. Only have to see the professionalism of the finals series in both divisions to see that.
Trouble with running a league though, is that there are extremely passionate people from extremely passionate clubs that magnify every little miss step made. The finals permit saga is a good example of this. A small governance slip up caused a major issue, and resignations and so on. Steady thoughtful people are required on the board. Club "Barrackers" would not be a good thing. The question would be weather the clubs would pursue individual club interest - or overall league health interest.
This is surely a p1ss take!!
These "small governance slip-ups" are consistently happening by the same few and doesn't look like improving any time soon.
No doubt club personnel pursue club interest which is not always for the betterment of the league - but this is what they are elected to do by their club members.
The HFL board members are elected to do what is best for the league in total - not any individual club - which is what seems to happen at times.
Put your hand up then if you're not happy with how its run.
Cracka, are you happy with how the league is run?
by daysofourlives » Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:20 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |