am Bays wrote:Booney wrote:So, for those who can't be arsed reading the whole thread, whodunnit?
Miss Scarlett of Kent Town
Not one of the popular picks.
by jo172 » Mon Dec 19, 2016 4:46 pm
am Bays wrote:Booney wrote:So, for those who can't be arsed reading the whole thread, whodunnit?
Miss Scarlett of Kent Town
by running defender » Sat Jan 07, 2017 1:04 am
by Ian » Sat Jan 07, 2017 8:16 pm
by TIRED TIGER » Sat Jan 07, 2017 8:42 pm
Ian wrote:This seems to be dragging on, hopefully it's over quicker than the AFL debacle investigating Essendon
by Ditchy » Sat Jan 07, 2017 10:21 pm
TIRED TIGER wrote:Ian wrote:This seems to be dragging on, hopefully it's over quicker than the AFL debacle investigating Essendon
wouldn't bet on a quick result. Took us over 4 months to have our investigation finalised last season
by daysofourlives » Sun Jan 08, 2017 8:44 am
Ditchy wrote:TIRED TIGER wrote:Ian wrote:This seems to be dragging on, hopefully it's over quicker than the AFL debacle investigating Essendon
wouldn't bet on a quick result. Took us over 4 months to have our investigation finalised last season
Grandstanding from Community Football and Duldig to try and justify why they're around
It's served no purpose to put out a press release in early December to say "A South Australian community football club has breached regulations controlling the payment of players" without saying which club.
All its done is create innuendo and rumour amongst people who are guessing which club is the guilty party. If you put out a vague press release without telling anyone which club it is - that's just incredibly stupid and grandstanding
Less grandstanding and when they've actually completed all investigations then name the club and then put out the press release not before
by FOURTH ESTATE » Fri Jan 13, 2017 11:06 pm
by running defender » Sun Jan 15, 2017 12:04 am
by FOURTH ESTATE » Sun Jan 15, 2017 8:26 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Jan 15, 2017 8:38 pm
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Self reported club all done and dusted.
Other breaches still being investigated but I do believe that they do have evidence
by easy TIGA » Mon Jan 16, 2017 12:06 pm
Jim05 wrote:FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Self reported club all done and dusted.
Other breaches still being investigated but I do believe that they do have evidence
Was the SAAFL team the self reporting one or one of the others?
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jan 16, 2017 12:20 pm
Jim05 wrote:FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Self reported club all done and dusted.
Other breaches still being investigated but I do believe that they do have evidence
Was the SAAFL team the self reporting one or one of the others?
by Look Good In Leather » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:57 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Jim05 wrote:FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Self reported club all done and dusted.
Other breaches still being investigated but I do believe that they do have evidence
Was the SAAFL team the self reporting one or one of the others?
I heard it was a west cost club but don't know the penalty (if there was one)
by daysofourlives » Fri Jan 20, 2017 10:28 am
by absolutebath » Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:53 am
daysofourlives wrote:Does Bathy know anything about the investigations?
#bathyknowsall
by daysofourlives » Thu Feb 02, 2017 10:11 pm
by OnSong » Fri Feb 03, 2017 8:20 am
by Officejet » Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:00 pm
by Robran » Fri Feb 24, 2017 6:11 am
by OnSong » Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:48 am
Officejet wrote:The Local Adelaide Plains paper saying that a “Footy Club has been caught in a salary cap swindle”, but doesn’t name which club…
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |