Brodlach wrote:Marsh out injured, just retire already.
I'd fake an injury too if i performed like him last night.
by The Bedge » Mon Jan 16, 2017 10:17 am
Brodlach wrote:Marsh out injured, just retire already.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Bedge » Mon Jan 16, 2017 10:20 am
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by whufc » Mon Jan 16, 2017 10:33 am
by hawks21 » Mon Jan 16, 2017 12:00 pm
by The Bedge » Mon Jan 16, 2017 12:10 pm
hawks21 wrote:Need to play another specialist batsman IMO. 1 too many alrounders. Still have Maxwell/Head, Zampa, Faulkner + 2 quicks. 6 bowling options is plenty IMO.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Dark Knight » Mon Jan 16, 2017 12:18 pm
Zartan wrote:Honestly, this is a bit of a conspiracy theory.. but do people really think all these players are getting injured, or is it an excuse used by CA to warrant their dumping while saving face? If CA dropped Marsh on form after naming him for India imagine the backlash!
Siddle - controversial selection Perth test.. dropped "injured" next test, not seen again.
Lynn - selected in ODI on the back of T20 form.. out to a horrible shot.. "injured" next ODI.
Marsh - has a stinker in last nights game.. "injured" next day.
Handscomb & Khawaja the replacements, who were both questioned why they weren't included in the original squads..
Coincidence?
by The Dark Knight » Mon Jan 16, 2017 12:20 pm
bennymacca wrote:according to mark waugh they now see him as a bowling allrounder that could even open the bowling if required
so why the hell did they bat him at number 4 in the one day side?
the mixed messages are astounding regarding the marshes
by Rik E Boy » Mon Jan 16, 2017 12:36 pm
by locky801 » Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:21 pm
by whufc » Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:23 pm
by The Dark Knight » Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:05 pm
locky801 wrote:Stoinis in for Marsh, FFS what are these selectors on. He will be too busy putting his hair in place, let alone the fact he's done SFA all summer
by locky801 » Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:21 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:locky801 wrote:Stoinis in for Marsh, FFS what are these selectors on. He will be too busy putting his hair in place, let alone the fact he's done SFA all summer
Yeah lol, Stoinis has struggled for runs and wickets this season. I like him but I'm dumbfounded to see that he's Marsh's replacement.
by The Dark Knight » Mon Jan 16, 2017 7:09 pm
locky801 wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:locky801 wrote:Stoinis in for Marsh, FFS what are these selectors on. He will be too busy putting his hair in place, let alone the fact he's done SFA all summer
Yeah lol, Stoinis has struggled for runs and wickets this season. I like him but I'm dumbfounded to see that he's Marsh's replacement.
guess they think crap replacing crap, Stoinis has gone downhill big time this year in all forms of the game
by The Bedge » Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:24 am
The Dark Knight wrote:Yeah lol, Stoinis has struggled for runs and wickets this season. I like him but I'm dumbfounded to see that he's Marsh's replacement.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by woodublieve12 » Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:41 am
Zartan wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Yeah lol, Stoinis has struggled for runs and wickets this season. I like him but I'm dumbfounded to see that he's Marsh's replacement.
Had a mate who played against Stoinis in a NPS game, and he reckons they'd laugh about him because how easy he was to set up to get out.. if that's coming from young up and coming blokes, how's he gonna go against a national side?!
CA's obsession with all-rounders is becoming sickening.
by bennymacca » Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:48 am
Zartan wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Yeah lol, Stoinis has struggled for runs and wickets this season. I like him but I'm dumbfounded to see that he's Marsh's replacement.
Had a mate who played against Stoinis in a NPS game, and he reckons they'd laugh about him because how easy he was to set up to get out.. if that's coming from young up and coming blokes, how's he gonna go against a national side?!
CA's obsession with all-rounders is becoming sickening.
by amber_fluid » Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:55 am
bennymacca wrote:Zartan wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Yeah lol, Stoinis has struggled for runs and wickets this season. I like him but I'm dumbfounded to see that he's Marsh's replacement.
Had a mate who played against Stoinis in a NPS game, and he reckons they'd laugh about him because how easy he was to set up to get out.. if that's coming from young up and coming blokes, how's he gonna go against a national side?!
CA's obsession with all-rounders is becoming sickening.
Why the hell dont they just pick cartwright then if they want an allrounder? I would be seriously pissed off if i were him
by Jim05 » Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:59 am
amber_fluid wrote:bennymacca wrote:Zartan wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Yeah lol, Stoinis has struggled for runs and wickets this season. I like him but I'm dumbfounded to see that he's Marsh's replacement.
Had a mate who played against Stoinis in a NPS game, and he reckons they'd laugh about him because how easy he was to set up to get out.. if that's coming from young up and coming blokes, how's he gonna go against a national side?!
CA's obsession with all-rounders is becoming sickening.
Why the hell dont they just pick cartwright then if they want an allrounder? I would be seriously pissed off if i were him
Exactly.
It just sends mixed messages to him and others.
Cartwright did nothing wrong in his one off appearance.
by amber_fluid » Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:05 am
by BoundaryRider84 » Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:18 am
amber_fluid wrote:Not Cartwright's fault that Smith didn't bowl him.
They picked him so they may as well bowl him to see how he goes.
He looked more comfortable batting than either Maddison or Fergie did.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |