Trader wrote:bennymacca wrote:I got an apple watch for christmas, and wore it on the weekend whilst i played a 40 over per side one day game.
I am a fat bloke playing country B Grade cricket. in 2 hr 45 mins, which included 7 overs of medium pacers, I burned nearly 10000kj and covered 12km for the day (would have included a bit of walking before and after the game), average heart rate of 145, and peak 191.
would love to see numbers like that for Starc when he bowls 20+ overs in a full day in the field.
According to this site:
http://content.bemagazine.com.au/bemaga ... alculator/That makes you 180kgs, which we know you're not.
I suspect your watch is giving you higher figures than the truth.
Or, and with the greatest respect BM but using your description of your kinanthropometry, your lack fitness means you have to work harder for a given intencity than say MW who does a lot of running (based on his posts over the years. Higher the HR for a given workload the more unfit you are.
Starc would probably have the same average HR as you for the same time period (~75% MHR - Z1) Interspersed with ave HRs of 170-180 BPM for an over. Much higher workload required though!
I suspect the watch is accurate.
MW wrote:145 average over 2 hours 45 is more like a marathon runner!
I would expect elite top level marathon runners at the front to sit at 88-92% MHR (zone 3/transport work) zone where they are just on the verge of their Lactate threshold (LT) so for for a 30 yo runner (170-180 BPM) for the race. Their average HR would be interspersed by surges up to 190 whilst they attempt to burn break their competitors by putting them into their "hurt zone" (above LT) , then recovering again at the 170 BPM before trying to break.
Recreation marathon plodders (good luck and on them I say) may sit at the 145 (75% MHR) for a 3-4 hrs.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!