Rumour re Media Coverage

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby bennymacca » Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:14 pm

johntheclaret wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Am I right that a season pass only gives you 18 games? So if I spend $75 I can only see my nominated teams games? $90 gives me all AFL games.


Pretty ridiculous that you can only watch the games of your club and not all sanfl games

Typical AFLite response.

Get yourself off to the No SANFL in the AFL thread.


lol are you serious? sorry for having an opinion (and one that is shared by lots of SANFL fans)

no wonder the comp is dying
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 12:22 pm
Has liked: 2253 times
Been liked: 1803 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby bulldogproud » Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:11 pm

If you are a member of your club, the cost is only $29 for the season. Plus, the money goes to your club.
I am much happier giving $29 to Central and seeing all our matches than giving $90 or so for AwFuL matches.
Cheers
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: West Beach
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 401 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby Dutchy » Mon Mar 27, 2017 8:53 pm

People don't get my point, its a great deal for the regular die-hards who by default sign up every year. But how does that grow the comp?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 44455
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2311 times
Been liked: 3482 times

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby Wedgie » Mon Mar 27, 2017 8:59 pm

Dutchy wrote:People don't get my point, its a great deal for the regular die-hards who by default sign up every year. But how does that grow the comp?

It grows membership and is a great service to provide.
It grows the comp about as much as radio did, possibly more.
I was no longer a diehard but am definately a lot more interested now.
Its only a positive.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 50781
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2020 times
Been liked: 3862 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby whufc » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:16 pm

Agree this wont necessarily help with finding new members but this will help with retention which is just as important to growth

I'm not sure there a to many negatives to this
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 27453
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5565 times
Been liked: 2519 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby VALE PARK » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:23 pm

To me if you only have retention that means nil growth!
VALE PARK
Under 18s
 
Posts: 660
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:32 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 59 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby johntheclaret » Tue Mar 28, 2017 7:29 am

bennymacca wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Am I right that a season pass only gives you 18 games? So if I spend $75 I can only see my nominated teams games? $90 gives me all AFL games.


Pretty ridiculous that you can only watch the games of your club and not all sanfl games

Typical AFLite response.

Get yourself off to the No SANFL in the AFL thread.


lol are you serious? sorry for having an opinion (and one that is shared by lots of SANFL fans)

no wonder the comp is dying

Shoulda included the mandatory ;)
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13279
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby tipper » Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:38 am

VALE PARK wrote:To me if you only have retention that means nil growth!


but lately they have been struggling with retention. memberships for most clubs are down. if this stems that bleed, they can then move on to growth from there. no point in trying to grow while the comp is bleeding out.....
tipper
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2854
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:45 am
Has liked: 359 times
Been liked: 531 times
Grassroots Team: Peake

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:19 am

Stopping the bleeding is growth for the SANFL in its current state.

I think if the streams are made free, it opens up a whole new viewership in the younger generation.

Perhaps the paid stream memberships give you access to all the matches and replays etc, but having it free via YouTube would be a great way to promote/market the league.
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 56642
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 11805 times
Been liked: 3582 times

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby VALE PARK » Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:20 pm

Correct,
so so simple but,
not much vision,for the income of only few dollars.........
VALE PARK
Under 18s
 
Posts: 660
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:32 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 59 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby bulldogproud » Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:43 pm

Dutchy wrote:People don't get my point, its a great deal for the regular die-hards who by default sign up every year. But how does that grow the comp?


Watch the video of the matches with people who don't normally go to SANFL matches. When they see the standard of our game, hopefully they will become interested in our comp.

Cheers
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: West Beach
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 401 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby goddy11 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 7:22 pm

Paid for mine today.
User avatar
goddy11
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:35 pm
Has liked: 559 times
Been liked: 211 times
Grassroots Team: Myponga-Sellicks

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby goddy11 » Wed Mar 29, 2017 4:12 pm

PRICING

Digital Pass Product

Season Pass
$29.99 Members
$74.99 Non-members
30-Day Pass*
$5.99 Members
$14.99 Non-members

It does encourage membership and is an incentive for members. I feel the non member fee is high as it impacts persons that can not get to the games.
Perhaps the digital pass could be added to club memberships at an even lower cost.
User avatar
goddy11
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:35 pm
Has liked: 559 times
Been liked: 211 times
Grassroots Team: Myponga-Sellicks

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby holden78 » Wed Mar 29, 2017 5:25 pm

Stop the bleeding?
Way to late, most of the blood has drained away to the Gayfl W!
Crowds this season will slide more, why wouldn't they, when it's got no direction for the future
other then to keep the two cancers happy with a fake competition. RIP 2013 the last of magnificent history.
holden78
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1945
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:43 am
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 55 times

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby Big Phil » Fri Mar 31, 2017 12:03 am

User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20257
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 120 times
Been liked: 271 times

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby Booney » Fri Mar 31, 2017 8:14 am

Interesting views here.

Mine, and I think Dutchy and some others view is that while your club will get better coverage to your devices if you pay the subscription fee the deal doesn't do much by way of promoting the league to people who either 1, don't follow it or 2, used to but gave it away. I guess in someways if RPH or Life were calling it, does that bring in new listeners, followers?

Perhaps some of this is just some of us being old fashioned and the fact that we like the old tranny sitting somewhere in the back yard as you listen to a game, quite often not even the game that my team was playing in, it was a way of keeping in touch with all the teams across the competition.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58211
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7467 times
Been liked: 10755 times

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby JK » Fri Mar 31, 2017 9:38 am

Not a fan of losing the radio coverage, and whilst Im usually highly critical of the SANFL, I actually think this isn't a bad model .. Hopefully over time the clubs can use it to to pick up a few more memberships than they otherwise would have have.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37368
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4438 times
Been liked: 2985 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby Booney » Fri Mar 31, 2017 9:54 am

JK wrote:Not a fan of losing the radio coverage, and whilst Im usually highly critical of the SANFL, I actually think this isn't a bad model .. Hopefully over time the clubs can use it to to pick up a few more memberships than they otherwise would have have.


There's the kicker though, what's more important, people buying memberships or people walking through the gate on a Saturday?

Memberships will help each individual club more, people on the terraces will help all clubs.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58211
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7467 times
Been liked: 10755 times

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby bennymacca » Fri Mar 31, 2017 9:56 am

still dont see the downside of paying $75 for all games, with that $75 going to a club of your choosing in a digital membership or something.
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 12:22 pm
Has liked: 2253 times
Been liked: 1803 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Re: Rumour re Media Coverage

Postby JK » Fri Mar 31, 2017 9:56 am

Booney wrote:
JK wrote:Not a fan of losing the radio coverage, and whilst Im usually highly critical of the SANFL, I actually think this isn't a bad model .. Hopefully over time the clubs can use it to to pick up a few more memberships than they otherwise would have have.


There's the kicker though, what's more important, people buying memberships or people walking through the gate on a Saturday?

Memberships will help each individual club more, people on the terraces will help all clubs.


I think with attendances declining, neither radio or streaming would make much difference tbh
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37368
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4438 times
Been liked: 2985 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |