Round 9

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Round 9

Postby Spargo » Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:57 pm

Brodlach wrote:Certainly there is another at the club who should stand down for the good of the club.


Go on...
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot

I’ll wait for an angel, but I won’t hold my breath
‘Magine they’re busy, think I’m doin’ ok…
Spargo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15949
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:42 pm
Location: Getting out of Dodge
Has liked: 5471 times
Been liked: 5114 times
Grassroots Team: Sacred Heart OC

Re: Round 9

Postby Brodlach » Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:58 pm

I'll keep that to myself
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
User avatar
Brodlach
Coach
 
 
Posts: 47323
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:18 pm
Location: Unley
Has liked: 72 times
Been liked: 4216 times
Grassroots Team: Colonel Light Gardens

Re: Round 9

Postby Wolf Pack » Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:08 pm

I have to agree with Brodlach.

Whilst Rubbers got us a flag and we will be forever thankful, his record over the journey is terrible.
2014 - 6 Wins and 12 Losses - 9th Place
2015 - 14 Wins and 8 Losses - Premiers
2016 - 2 Wins and 16 Losses - Wooden Spoon
2017 - 0 Wins and 9 Losses - Probable Wooden Spoon.


We need to start planning for 2018.
Would any other club accept this type of performance over 4 years?
Wolf Pack
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:31 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 31 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Round 9

Postby Mic » Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:16 pm

Wolf Pack wrote:I have to agree with Brodlach.

Whilst Rubbers got us a flag and we will be forever thankful, his record over the journey is terrible.
2014 - 6 Wins and 12 Losses - 9th Place
2015 - 14 Wins and 8 Losses - Premiers
2016 - 2 Wins and 16 Losses - Wooden Spoon
2017 - 0 Wins and 9 Losses - Probable Wooden Spoon.


We need to start planning for 2018.
Would any other club accept this type of performance over 4 years?


North.
User avatar
Mic
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3055
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:17 pm
Has liked: 166 times
Been liked: 144 times

Re: Round 9

Postby therisingblues » Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:20 pm

LMA wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:I see Port dropped their skipper again.
Feel sorry for West, how many of their own developed players are now playing against them today? Snelling and Bonner?
Throw in the other SANFL players pilfered from other teams, Eddy, Irra, Leinert, Hewett.


Pilfered hey, Yes Port forced these guys to enter the AFL draft in the hopes of realising their dreams :roll:

You seem to be struggling with the meaning of "pilfered" there LMA.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Round 9

Postby Wolf Pack » Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:21 pm

It's only Josh Carr's second year.
However, if he won two consecutive spoons, I'm sure he would be shown the door.
Wolf Pack
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:31 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 31 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Round 9

Postby LMA » Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:30 pm

therisingblues wrote:
LMA wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:I see Port dropped their skipper again.
Feel sorry for West, how many of their own developed players are now playing against them today? Snelling and Bonner?
Throw in the other SANFL players pilfered from other teams, Eddy, Irra, Leinert, Hewett.


Pilfered hey, Yes Port forced these guys to enter the AFL draft in the hopes of realising their dreams :roll:

You seem to be struggling with the meaning of "pilfered" there LMA.


Pilfer maybe for the No AFL in the SANFL tragics, Opportunity for the rest of us.
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: Round 9

Postby therisingblues » Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:06 pm

LMA wrote:
therisingblues wrote:
LMA wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:I see Port dropped their skipper again.
Feel sorry for West, how many of their own developed players are now playing against them today? Snelling and Bonner?
Throw in the other SANFL players pilfered from other teams, Eddy, Irra, Leinert, Hewett.


Pilfered hey, Yes Port forced these guys to enter the AFL draft in the hopes of realising their dreams :roll:

You seem to be struggling with the meaning of "pilfered" there LMA.


Pilfer maybe for the No AFL in the SANFL tragics, Opportunity for the rest of us.

Under past circumstances I would have been more happy for the lads taking their next step. Under past circumstances we had a system which didn't force team mate against team mate on their path to a better future.
I still wish Leinert all the best and truly hope he further swells the number of Sturt blokes in the Power's first team. I would find it a very bitter pill had all those Sturt blokes played for the Magpies and then thumped their former side to the tune of 125 points.
Surely you can relate to what we are saying here?
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Round 9

Postby CUTTERMAN » Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:04 am

LMA wrote:
therisingblues wrote:
LMA wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:I see Port dropped their skipper again.
Feel sorry for West, how many of their own developed players are now playing against them today? Snelling and Bonner?
Throw in the other SANFL players pilfered from other teams, Eddy, Irra, Leinert, Hewett.


Pilfered hey, Yes Port forced these guys to enter the AFL draft in the hopes of realising their dreams :roll:

You seem to be struggling with the meaning of "pilfered" there LMA.


Pilfer maybe for the No AFL in the SANFL tragics, Opportunity for the rest of us.

So tell me how much Port have paid in transfer fees for each of Lienert, Eddy, Irra, Snelling Hewett and Bonner. My understanding is nothing. Each of those players would cost another SANFL club about $30k in transfers alone and funnily enough, all of these guys are playing SANFL....what an opportunity!
Waiting for your facts, not glib rhetorical nonsense.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2954
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 213 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Round 9

Postby LMA » Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:29 am

So is it about the money or the players. It's pretty hard to fit a squad of 45 players into 22 is my educated guess why they are playing SANFL, not to mention the fact they're not quite up to the level yet. If you're hanging your hat on a couple of players making a difference then the standard of the league may be worse than I thought. Just guessing but I reckon the money recieved from the AFL clubs would offset a couple of 30k transfers (highly inflated considering weekly match payments)
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: Round 9

Postby LMA » Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:36 am

therisingblues wrote:
LMA wrote:
Pilfer maybe for the No AFL in the SANFL tragics, Opportunity for the rest of us.


Under past circumstances I would have been more happy for the lads taking their next step. Under past circumstances we had a system which didn't force team mate against team mate on their path to a better future.
I still wish Leinert all the best and truly hope he further swells the number of Sturt blokes in the Power's first team. I would find it a very bitter pill had all those Sturt blokes played for the Magpies and then thumped their former side to the tune of 125 points.
Surely you can relate to what we are saying here?


It was the former system that pitted teammate against teammate not the current which sees players train all week together and play together on the weekend
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: Round 9

Postby CUTTERMAN » Tue Jun 13, 2017 7:46 am

LMA wrote:So is it about the money or the players. It's pretty hard to fit a squad of 45 players into 22 is my educated guess why they are playing SANFL, not to mention the fact they're not quite up to the level yet. If you're hanging your hat on a couple of players making a difference then the standard of the league may be worse than I thought. Just guessing but I reckon the money recieved from the AFL clubs would offset a couple of 30k transfers (highly inflated considering weekly match payments)

What money from the AFL clubs?
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2954
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 213 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Round 9

Postby Booney » Tue Jun 13, 2017 7:51 am

Brodlach wrote:I'll keep that to myself


In the premiership photo but not a player? ;)
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58315
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7481 times
Been liked: 10770 times

Re: Round 9

Postby am Bays » Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:53 am

Three things I learnt yesterday:

1. Norths kicking is sh!t!
2. You don't have to be follically challenged to make WTF umpiring decisions
3. We can't afford to be lazy and stop working as a team!
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18547
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 1807 times

Re: Round 9

Postby am Bays » Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:55 am

am Bays wrote:Who's ready to beat some Cocks today???


Well that was satisfying....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18547
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 1807 times

Re: Round 9

Postby therisingblues » Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:59 am

LMA wrote:
therisingblues wrote:
LMA wrote:
Pilfer maybe for the No AFL in the SANFL tragics, Opportunity for the rest of us.


Under past circumstances I would have been more happy for the lads taking their next step. Under past circumstances we had a system which didn't force team mate against team mate on their path to a better future.
I still wish Leinert all the best and truly hope he further swells the number of Sturt blokes in the Power's first team. I would find it a very bitter pill had all those Sturt blokes played for the Magpies and then thumped their former side to the tune of 125 points.
Surely you can relate to what we are saying here?


It was the former system that pitted teammate against teammate not the current which sees players train all week together and play together on the weekend

Payer against player in a system where it is deemed "reserves" for those team mates.
In the new system, you have team mates who came through the "league" together, now having to play against one another.
It is all a matter of perspective. We are a part of a league that is being made a joke of. You are looking from the outside saying, "who gives a ****?" There is much more at stake for us.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Round 9

Postby therisingblues » Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:05 am

LMA wrote:So is it about the money or the players. It's pretty hard to fit a squad of 45 players into 22 is my educated guess why they are playing SANFL, not to mention the fact they're not quite up to the level yet. If you're hanging your hat on a couple of players making a difference then the standard of the league may be worse than I thought. Just guessing but I reckon the money recieved from the AFL clubs would offset a couple of 30k transfers (highly inflated considering weekly match payments)


A) Set up in a reserves comp then if it is such a problem for you.
B) In that case, just send Wingard and Pittard over to Carlton. No transfer fees applicable, and it is only a couple of players, if that makes any difference then the standard at Port is much worse off than I thought.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Round 9

Postby Dutchy » Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:34 am

Booney wrote:
Brodlach wrote:I'll keep that to myself


In the premiership photo but not a player? ;)


or a coach :lol:
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 44507
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2320 times
Been liked: 3494 times

Re: Round 9

Postby Magellan » Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:56 am

Spargo wrote:Gas turned off in the away teams change rooms at Prospect today?

Yeah, sorry about that. You see, we use gas to power our dominant pokie machine empire rather than servicing the oval's facilities, since they're more important than achieving on field results. We also use hot air, which is also in rich supply from certain parts of the club's administration.

Seriously, I thought the Bays looked alright yesterday, have certainly improved and found another gear when North took it up to them at lemon time. Goes to show what a club can do when its on the bones of its arse. North continue to provide concrete evidence that we're quite simply rubbish, and that the club doesn't really give a shit beyond the annual balance sheet.
"Religion is like a blind man looking in a black room for a black cat that isn't there...and finding it." - Oscar Wilde
User avatar
Magellan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5981
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:04 pm
Location: Four Seasons Total Landscaping
Has liked: 757 times
Been liked: 1517 times

Re: Round 9

Postby matt35 » Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:04 am

Crowd at Prospect was 2,356. Certainly a good turn out of Glenelg supporters there; great to see!

Very happy to leave Prospect with 2 points given our recent form against North. Certainly would have taken 6-3 and 3rd mid season at the start of the year. Bring on the Eagles after the bye.
No Surrender!
matt35
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:50 pm
Location: Darwin
Has liked: 513 times
Been liked: 51 times
Grassroots Team: Boston

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |