AFL Round 14

[Jim05]

Selwood immune to the concussion rules?
Surely Geelong risk a fine if he plays on

How exactly is he immune to the concussion rule?

At the time I posted it he was up on the boundary and had removed his tracksuit top as if he was about to come back on.

[JK]

In most of Geelong's come from behind wins this season, Selwood has put the team on his shoulders .. Who can do it in his absence?

[Wedgie]

Selwood immune to the concussion rules?
Surely Geelong risk a fine if he plays on

How exactly is he immune to the concussion rule?

At the time I posted it he was up on the boundary and had removed his tracksuit top as if he was about to come back on.

You're not allowed to be on the boundary and take your tracksuit top off?
Am I allowed to take my jacket off outside the pub or would that make me immune to the rules too?

[Jim05]

Selwood immune to the concussion rules?
Surely Geelong risk a fine if he plays on

How exactly is he immune to the concussion rule?

At the time I posted it he was up on the boundary and had removed his tracksuit top as if he was about to come back on.

You're not allowed to be on the boundary and take your tracksuit top off?
Am I allowed to take my jacket off outside the pub or would that make me immune to the rules too?

He was right on the line near the interchange gate and it looked like he was about to go back on. He was obviously then told he couldn't go back on, perhaps he thought he was ok?

[Wedgie]

Essendon might start the game 10 minutes early next week with 30 players on the ground, are they immune to the rules?
Surely Essendon risk a fine if they do that?

[Wedgie]

I think Geelong are immune to the 50m rule.

[Jim05]

Essendon might start the game 10 minutes early next week with 30 players on the ground, are they immune to the rules?
Surely Essendon risk a fine if they do that?

We still wouldn't win!

[JK]

Holiday coming up for Houli

[JK]

Cats off the hook .. so many good finishes this round

[Wedgie]

In this comp you shouldnt be able to win games when down so many rotations, gutsy by the players and genius coaching by Scott.

[JK]

Umpiring been abysmal at the G

[Wedgie]

34 points down, 3 players down. Not too many sides could have done that, if any.
We must be immune to the rules.

[Jim05]

34 points down, 3 players down. Not too many sides could have done that, if any.
We must be immune to the rules.

Definitely gutsy.
Not many teams could lose half their side in the first 20 seconds of the game and still win [emoji6]

[Wedgie]

34 points down, 3 players down. Not too many sides could have done that, if any.
We must be immune to the rules.

Definitely gutsy.
Not many teams could lose half their side in the first 20 seconds of the game and still win [emoji6]

Emoji6 indeed whatever that is. Or is Emoji6 immune to the rules?

[The Jack]

Holiday coming up for Houli

Most likely. Especially with the "Trial by Commentator" that seems to be a thing these days. BT asking everyone straight after "What did you think?", including MRP member Bartel. Such a wanker.

[thegrowler]

Am I the only one that has noticed the eerie similarity in today and yesterday's knockouts.

Sickening clashes the Selwood and Oliver incidents

[JK]

Holiday coming up for Houli

Most likely. Especially with the "Trial by Commentator" that seems to be a thing these days. BT asking everyone straight after "What did you think?", including MRP member Bartel. Such a wanker.

Can't stand BT but you can't really blame commentatory for discussing it

[Eagles2014]

Richmond and Carlton game is horrid, skills by both teams awful.

[Magellan]

Agree Eagles2014, skills by Carlton and Richmond are absolutely terrible. Certainly not deserving of a pay rise, both clubs' players should donate the extra 20% to charity.

[The Jack]

Holiday coming up for Houli

Most likely. Especially with the "Trial by Commentator" that seems to be a thing these days. BT asking everyone straight after "What did you think?", including MRP member Bartel. Such a wanker.

Can't stand BT but you can't really blame commentatory for discussing it

Yeah for sure, but all that really needs to be said IMHO is that it'll be looked at and move on. I guess with so few incidents making their way to the tribunal, they feel there's no danger of a "mistrial", as it were. Of course that's another discussion.