Port Adelaide 2017

[amber_fluid]

Just a small request, but do you have to be rude to everyone that might not have the same opinion as you?

No. Provided those people read what I've said, agree with it, STFU and move on, then and only then will I be nice!

EFA

[bennymacca]

Interesting that adding McEvoy moves Mumford ahead of Kreuzer.

What happens if you add all of the ruckmen in the comp?

I'd suspect not much. As in, the order would stay pretty much the same and the scores would condense.

.

You have already proven this to be incorrect by adding a single extra ruck.

Struggling with reading comprehension too benny?

Mumford went ahead of Kreuzer because McEvoys hitouts made Kreuzers relatively low number even more "variant".

I doubt adding other rucks would change it all that much other than some minor jockeying for positions.

i told you earlier that your standard deviations would stuff everything up unless you have everyone in the comp in there, you argued with me and said it wouldnt, then you add a single player and it changes the order and you say everything is ok?

[morell]

i told you earlier that your standard deviations would stuff everything up unless you have everyone in the comp in there, you argued with me and said it wouldnt, then you add a single player and it changes the order and you say everything is ok?

Fair enough, I meant it that Kruezer wasn't going to overtake Ryder but I was too precise with my language.

I will add the other ruckman tomorrow and post the results.

However, a ruck man just in 5th place who then just moves to 4th because of one additon to the sample size is hardly "stuffing it up" its precisely what you'd expect.

Stefan Martin might cause a slight ripple, maybe Goldy too.

We'll see.

If Ryder still comes out on top will you admit hes #1?

[morell]

Just a small request, but do you have to be rude to everyone that might not have the same opinion as you?

No. Provided those people read what I've said, agree with it, STFU and move on, then and only then will I be nice!

EFA

My missus would agree

[bennymacca]

i told you earlier that your standard deviations would stuff everything up unless you have everyone in the comp in there, you argued with me and said it wouldnt, then you add a single player and it changes the order and you say everything is ok?

Fair enough, I meant it that Kruezer wasn't going to overtake Ryder but I was too precise with my language.

I will add the other ruckman tomorrow and post the results.

However, a ruck man just in 5th place who then just moves to 4th because of one additon to the sample size is hardly "stuffing it up" its precisely what you'd expect.

Stefan Martin might cause a slight ripple, maybe Goldy too.

We'll see.

If Ryder still comes out on top will you admit hes #1?

you still the issue of weighting each stat correctly and the issue that some stats are correlated to the others

[amber_fluid]

Just a small request, but do you have to be rude to everyone that might not have the same opinion as you?

No. Provided those people read what I've said, agree with it, STFU and move on, then and only then will I be nice!

EFA

My missus would agree

Please please please tell me you don't use data with links attached when you argue with your missus?

[mots02]

Just a small request, but do you have to be rude to everyone that might not have the same opinion as you?

Just to clarify, apparently he doesn't have opinions, he has conclusions... only the rest of us mortals have lowly opinions

[morell]

Give me some weights then.

And not any more. They're all reasonably independent datasets.

[morell]

Please please please tell me you don't use data with links attached when you argue with your missus?

I used a spreadsheet to choose my missus bahahahahah

[morell]

Just a small request, but do you have to be rude to everyone that might not have the same opinion as you?

Just to clarify, apparently he doesn't have opinions, he has conclusions... only the rest of us mortals have lowly opinions

Not at all. If someone posts something and backs it up with logic I am the first to smash that little thumb.

I hate it when people make bullshit statements, you prove them wrong, then they pass the buck with "well its my opinion".

**** that. Could you imagine if everyone worked shit out like that?

"Sorry Pharaoh Khufu, despite your slaves accurate estimates, in our opinion we should build the pyramids out of wood"
"Sorry Mr Fleming, in our opinion penicillium notatum has no medicinal benefit, despite your clear evidence that it does"
"Look, in my opinion the bungey cord is the right length, we did not measure it but hey... im entitled to my opinion, so I say jump"

No one is entitled to an opinion. You're entitled to be informed. If you're going to argue with me, im all for it, I love it, just back up what you're saying is all I ask.

[JK]

Looks like Phil G is back

[amber_fluid]

IMG_1537.JPG (50.34 KiB) Viewed 543 times

[amber_fluid]

Please please please tell me you don't use data with links attached when you argue with your missus?

I used a spreadsheet to choose my missus bahahahahah

I should have done that.
I could have taken a little from Column A, B and C.

[RustyCage]

Looks like Phil G is back

You sound like an enemy

[heater31]

Looks like Phil G is back

You sound like an enemy

Those were they days......good times

[JK]

Please please please tell me you don't use data with links attached when you argue with your missus?

I used a spreadsheet to choose my missus bahahahahah

I should have done that.
I could have taken a little from Column A, B and C.

A = Tranquilizer Dart
B = Chloroform
C = Money

[Wedgie]

Sweet baby jesus!

[cracka]

Please please please tell me you don't use data with links attached when you argue with your missus?

I used a spreadsheet to choose my missus bahahahahah

The crazy/hot scale is the only way to choose a partner

[stan]

I am amazed that this is still going.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

[carey]

I am amazed that this is still going.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

Are you really?