bennymacca wrote:Same Jacobs & adelaide 41+ double is paying $51 on William Hill. No idea if that’s good but I put some on it
It is.
Jacobs is $17 & Adelaide 40+ is $5 on sportsbet.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:44 pm
bennymacca wrote:Same Jacobs & adelaide 41+ double is paying $51 on William Hill. No idea if that’s good but I put some on it
by Brodlach » Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:45 pm
bennymacca wrote:Same Jacobs & adelaide 41+ double is paying $51 on William Hill. No idea if that’s good but I put some on it
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Robran » Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:51 pm
by Corona Man » Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:58 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Sep 27, 2017 1:04 pm
Brodlach wrote:bennymacca wrote:Same Jacobs & adelaide 41+ double is paying $51 on William Hill. No idea if that’s good but I put some on it
Odds should be about $85
Jacobs $17
Adelaide 40+ $5
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Sep 27, 2017 1:06 pm
Corona Man wrote:Nankervis isn't the worst, be a good battle between him & Jacobs. The winner of that matchup will go a long way to determining the winning on the day. What's Nankervis paying?
by Corona Man » Wed Sep 27, 2017 1:13 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Corona Man wrote:Nankervis isn't the worst, be a good battle between him & Jacobs. The winner of that matchup will go a long way to determining the winning on the day. What's Nankervis paying?
They wont be near each other apart form the ruck duels, TN drops back and fills the hole.
by Booney » Wed Sep 27, 2017 1:22 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Sep 27, 2017 1:32 pm
Booney wrote:McGovern officially ruled out this morning.
by am Bays » Wed Sep 27, 2017 1:44 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Booney wrote:McGovern officially ruled out this morning.
Poor bugger.
by LMA » Wed Sep 27, 2017 1:53 pm
by MW » Wed Sep 27, 2017 2:12 pm
LMA wrote:I reckon they should bring in a sub rule for the Grand Final, 4 on the pine and 1 sub who can only be activated if an injury occurs. The way the game is played now if a side goes down 1 rotation early in the match they find it pretty hard to run it out.
by Spargo » Wed Sep 27, 2017 2:28 pm
by MW » Wed Sep 27, 2017 2:40 pm
Spargo wrote:I think after halftime that Richmond should be able to wear their traditional guernsey & the Crows wear a clash strip...
by woodublieve12 » Wed Sep 27, 2017 3:31 pm
JK wrote:Booney wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Booney wrote:
If Adelaide lose then Jacobs won't win the medal.
Seemingly, the NS isn't always from the victors though, my take is that the odds would be too juicy combined.
The last time, IIRC, was Buckley in 2002 and that was lead balloon stuff. Won't ever go to the best for the losing team again.
Judd in 05' .. JPK must have gone close last year
by Spargo » Wed Sep 27, 2017 3:45 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Booney wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Booney wrote:
If Adelaide lose then Jacobs won't win the medal.
Seemingly, the NS isn't always from the victors though, my take is that the odds would be too juicy combined.
The last time, IIRC, was Buckley in 2002 and that was lead balloon stuff. Won't ever go to the best for the losing team again.
Judd in 05' .. JPK must have gone close last year
Jpk was bog easily last year.
by LMA » Wed Sep 27, 2017 3:48 pm
MW wrote:LMA wrote:I reckon they should bring in a sub rule for the Grand Final, 4 on the pine and 1 sub who can only be activated if an injury occurs. The way the game is played now if a side goes down 1 rotation early in the match they find it pretty hard to run it out.
Why change the rules for a GF?
by Booney » Wed Sep 27, 2017 3:49 pm
LMA wrote:MW wrote:LMA wrote:I reckon they should bring in a sub rule for the Grand Final, 4 on the pine and 1 sub who can only be activated if an injury occurs. The way the game is played now if a side goes down 1 rotation early in the match they find it pretty hard to run it out.
Why change the rules for a GF?
It's supposed to be the best game of the year, gives every opportunity if 1 side is disadvantaged by an early day ending injury.
by MW » Wed Sep 27, 2017 3:58 pm
LMA wrote:MW wrote:LMA wrote:I reckon they should bring in a sub rule for the Grand Final, 4 on the pine and 1 sub who can only be activated if an injury occurs. The way the game is played now if a side goes down 1 rotation early in the match they find it pretty hard to run it out.
Why change the rules for a GF?
It's supposed to be the best game of the year, gives every opportunity if 1 side is disadvantaged by an early day ending injury.
by valleys07 » Wed Sep 27, 2017 4:00 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Jpk was bog easily last year.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |