NAFC "Football Department Review"

[tipper]

any further news on this review? it seems to be taking an awfully long time, and considering it was said to be an "in season" review, and the season finished a couple of weeks ago (longer for North) they seem to be taking their time.

i would have thought that they would want to enact any of the recommendations that come out of it in time for recruiting for next season (which may already be underway??) they really need to pull their fingers out. or will any results from the review be kept to the chosen few?

[Magellan]

any further news on this review? it seems to be taking an awfully long time, and considering it was said to be an "in season" review, and the season finished a couple of weeks ago (longer for North) they seem to be taking their time.

i would have thought that they would want to enact any of the recommendations that come out of it in time for recruiting for next season (which may already be underway??) they really need to pull their fingers out. or will any results from the review be kept to the chosen few?

I think the review has been completed, and the board will now review its findings before deciding what it wants to present. I guess it'll be at their next meeting, but I don't know when that is.

My understanding the board's translation of the review would be publicly available, but the question is not who can access it but rather what the board says is wrong and what they're going to fix.

[Booney]

any further news on this review? it seems to be taking an awfully long time, and considering it was said to be an "in season" review, and the season finished a couple of weeks ago (longer for North) they seem to be taking their time.

i would have thought that they would want to enact any of the recommendations that come out of it in time for recruiting for next season (which may already be underway??) they really need to pull their fingers out. or will any results from the review be kept to the chosen few?

I think the review has been completed, and the board will now review its findings before deciding what it wants to present. I guess it'll be at their next meeting, but I don't know when that is.

My understanding the board's translation of the review would be publicly available, but the question is not who can access it but rather what the board says is wrong and what they're going to fix.

I wonder if the board will find the board is the right board to be the board?

[tipper]

any further news on this review? it seems to be taking an awfully long time, and considering it was said to be an "in season" review, and the season finished a couple of weeks ago (longer for North) they seem to be taking their time.

i would have thought that they would want to enact any of the recommendations that come out of it in time for recruiting for next season (which may already be underway??) they really need to pull their fingers out. or will any results from the review be kept to the chosen few?

I think the review has been completed, and the board will now review its findings before deciding what it wants to present. I guess it'll be at their next meeting, but I don't know when that is.

My understanding the board's translation of the review would be publicly available, but the question is not who can access it but rather what the board says is wrong and what they're going to fix.

I wonder if the board will find the board is the right board to be the board?

will they be able to bore down to the core issues? or will it be too boring?

[Pseudo]

Did the board review begin with a few dirty jokes to break the ice, or was that considered too bawd-y?

[Magellan]

Did the board review begin with a few dirty jokes to break the ice, or was that considered too bawd-y?

No, I hear meetings always kick off with liberal does of black raspberry liqueur. Members say its a Cham, bord says otherwise.

[Pseudo]

Did the board review begin with a few dirty jokes to break the ice, or was that considered too bawd-y?

No, I hear meetings always kick off with liberal does of black raspberry liqueur. Members say its a Cham, bord says otherwise.

Cham-bord? Meh. I'd have opted for a nice Bord-eaux myself...

[Ian]

any further news on this review? it seems to be taking an awfully long time, and considering it was said to be an "in season" review, and the season finished a couple of weeks ago (longer for North) they seem to be taking their time.

i would have thought that they would want to enact any of the recommendations that come out of it in time for recruiting for next season (which may already be underway??) they really need to pull their fingers out. or will any results from the review be kept to the chosen few?

I think the review has been completed, and the board will now review its findings before deciding what it wants to present. I guess it'll be at their next meeting, but I don't know when that is.

My understanding the board's translation of the review would be publicly available, but the question is not who can access it but rather what the board says is wrong and what they're going to fix.

I wonder if the board will find the board is the right board to be the board?

Footy department review only Booney, unfortunately, in a large % of the current board, you may not be far off the mark

[tipper]

Did the board review begin with a few dirty jokes to break the ice, or was that considered too bawd-y?

No, I hear meetings always kick off with liberal does of black raspberry liqueur. Members say its a Cham, bord says otherwise.

Cham-bord? Meh. I'd have opted for a nice Bord-eaux myself...

then off to the bordello once the meeting is over?

[Pseudo]

Did the board review begin with a few dirty jokes to break the ice, or was that considered too bawd-y?

No, I hear meetings always kick off with liberal does of black raspberry liqueur. Members say its a Cham, bord says otherwise.

Cham-bord? Meh. I'd have opted for a nice Bord-eaux myself...

then off to the bordello once the meeting is over?

J'aurais preferé aller au bordel tout d'abord...

[Booney]

Surf board.

[Magellan]

Did the board review begin with a few dirty jokes to break the ice, or was that considered too bawd-y?

No, I hear meetings always kick off with liberal does of black raspberry liqueur. Members say its a Cham, bord says otherwise.

Cham-bord? Meh. I'd have opted for a nice Bord-eaux myself...

Not for want of trying, a number of cases were confiscated at the bord-er.

[UK Fan]

Just piss off Meggsy simple. The man is useless

Send him to Carlton as triggs replacement.

[Wedgie]

Results are in, apparently North are faaarked.

[am Bays]

No, I hear meetings always kick off with liberal does of black raspberry liqueur. Members say its a Cham, bord says otherwise.

Cham-bord? Meh. I'd have opted for a nice Bord-eaux myself...

then off to the bordello once the meeting is over?

J'aurais preferé aller au bordel tout d'abord...

Ouzo, I love it when you speak Greek to me...

[Magellan]

Just piss off Meggsy simple. The man is useless

Send him to Carlton as triggs replacement.

As long as we don't get Trigg in return. We've already had to put up with him once before at Prospect.

[tipper]

still nothing on this??

tick tock tick tock.......

[Wedgie]

still nothing on this??

tick tock tick tock.......

They sent out an emsil today, a members forum is on November 14.

[tipper]

Cheers for the update wedgie. Looks like something might finally be happening with it.

Hopefully some change for the better is implemented soon.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

[Wedgie]

Cheers for the update wedgie. Looks like something might finally be happening with it.

Hopefully some change for the better is implemented soon.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

Bit hard to change things for the worse unless we could manage to come 11th.