Aerie wrote:Is Shane McAdam any relation to Gilbert or Adrian?
I reckon I heard on the LifeFM coverage a week or so back there was a North McAdam connection.
by Grenville » Wed Apr 25, 2018 9:38 pm
Aerie wrote:Is Shane McAdam any relation to Gilbert or Adrian?
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Apr 25, 2018 9:57 pm
Aerie wrote:Is Shane McAdam any relation to Gilbert or Adrian?
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Apr 25, 2018 10:02 pm
by robranisgod » Wed Apr 25, 2018 10:04 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Aerie wrote:Is Shane McAdam any relation to Gilbert or Adrian?
Apparently cousins but I’m not sure how that fits in regarding age as it’s a fair gap.
by Bluedemon » Wed Apr 25, 2018 11:00 pm
Aerie wrote:Is Shane McAdam any relation to Gilbert or Adrian?
by Big Phil » Wed Apr 25, 2018 11:03 pm
Bluedemon wrote:Aerie wrote:Is Shane McAdam any relation to Gilbert or Adrian?
Yes, nephew
by saintal » Wed Apr 25, 2018 11:08 pm
goddy11 wrote:Irra seems to have more skills than he had at South. A lot of pace as well.
by whitepointers » Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:16 am
RB wrote:PhilH wrote:BTW - Crowd Figure advised 7965
Were any people 'locked out'? If so it's a shame because on any other ground you could fit at least 10k.
by Michael » Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:38 am
Dutchy wrote:PhilH wrote:That would be largest crowd to a SANFL minor rd game since ANZAC Day 2014 (Norwood v North at Adelaide Oval)
Really? Geez things have dropped off pretty badly.
What was the crowd when Tex played at the Bay?
by whitepointers » Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:49 am
by mickey » Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:18 am
by Booney » Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:33 am
by Booney » Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:45 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:Great day to celebrate 50 years since our 68 flag and good to get to The President’s Lunch before the game. Great crowd and turnout, even about 8 people up on a house roof at the northern end like the old days.
Not sure how Pickled Pear can be eligible to play today, pretty poor form by Port and the AFL. I thought SANFL clubs get fined if they field a player that wasn’t listed in the initial squad.
Great win Blues.
by Dogwatcher » Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:04 am
by Booney » Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:11 am
by Dogwatcher » Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:13 am
by UK Fan » Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:36 am
Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Great day to celebrate 50 years since our 68 flag and good to get to The President’s Lunch before the game. Great crowd and turnout, even about 8 people up on a house roof at the northern end like the old days.
Not sure how Pickled Pear can be eligible to play today, pretty poor form by Port and the AFL. I thought SANFL clubs get fined if they field a player that wasn’t listed in the initial squad.
Great win Blues.
As the AFL suspension relates to off field matters the suspension doesn't cover the SANFL, under current rules which seems farcical. If you're suspended, you're suspended, but,under current SANFL rules if an AFL listed player is available and eligible to play, he must, it's sort of the "play to the line" rule, so the SANFL are as confused as the AFL are on this one.
I believe the fine will be $500.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Booney » Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:42 am
UK Fan wrote:Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Great day to celebrate 50 years since our 68 flag and good to get to The President’s Lunch before the game. Great crowd and turnout, even about 8 people up on a house roof at the northern end like the old days.
Not sure how Pickled Pear can be eligible to play today, pretty poor form by Port and the AFL. I thought SANFL clubs get fined if they field a player that wasn’t listed in the initial squad.
Great win Blues.
As the AFL suspension relates to off field matters the suspension doesn't cover the SANFL, under current rules which seems farcical. If you're suspended, you're suspended, but,under current SANFL rules if an AFL listed player is available and eligible to play, he must, it's sort of the "play to the line" rule, so the SANFL are as confused as the AFL are on this one.
I believe the fine will be $500.
Farcical as you say. Club imposed suspensions fair enough AFL imposed must cross all codes in the future.
If he’s guilty of what he’s been charged with as the afl is stating why is he playing any footy at all ???
by stan » Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:57 am
Nah he has to read through all of Uk fans posts. Assuming he can read off course. He does play for Port after all.Booney wrote:UK Fan wrote:Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Great day to celebrate 50 years since our 68 flag and good to get to The President’s Lunch before the game. Great crowd and turnout, even about 8 people up on a house roof at the northern end like the old days.
Not sure how Pickled Pear can be eligible to play today, pretty poor form by Port and the AFL. I thought SANFL clubs get fined if they field a player that wasn’t listed in the initial squad.
Great win Blues.
As the AFL suspension relates to off field matters the suspension doesn't cover the SANFL, under current rules which seems farcical. If you're suspended, you're suspended, but,under current SANFL rules if an AFL listed player is available and eligible to play, he must, it's sort of the "play to the line" rule, so the SANFL are as confused as the AFL are on this one.
I believe the fine will be $500.
Farcical as you say. Club imposed suspensions fair enough AFL imposed must cross all codes in the future.
If he’s guilty of what he’s been charged with as the afl is stating why is he playing any footy at all ???
"Inappropriate contact", what's fair you reckon, 20 years non parole, life?
by Booney » Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:08 am
stan wrote:Nah he has to read through all of Uk fans posts. Assuming he can read off course. He does play for Port after all.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |