Adelaide Footy League Division 5 - 2018

[The Bedge]

Check Zesers A and B split in 2015/16. Reckon you’ll get your answer there.

Previous 2 years would be 2016 and 2017 regardless of how many games played in 2017. It appears 2016 was 6 A grade and 6 B grade therefore the higher grade played takes over. 3 points from HFL to SAAFL for majority of A grade minus 1 point for not playing any where in 2017 brings him down to 2 points this year. Games played in 2015 are irrelevant.

It doesn't say anywhere that a 50/50 split means the higher grade takes over.

So I then read it:

8.8.3.2
A player who has played majority of matches for the Reserves (B Grade) Team but has also played a minimum of five (5) A Grade matches in the previous two seasons and is transferring between clubs in difference leagues the player will have points rating of one (1)

[The Bedge]

are you putting in your application for coaching gig at Hope Valley

Kenilworth, I believe, are fine on their points - move on troll

It's more enjoyable than thinking about how my own club is travelling at the moment!

Plus you only want me to move along because the league signed off on the points and if they're wrong, they wouldn't want the egg on their face

[Beachboy]

[oldman]

9. APPS General
9.1. In the case of a player who has played an equal number of games in two or
more categories, the highest category (points) shall apply.

[The Bedge]

Read 9.1

Read your face

[carey]

I wonder if they didn't beat Hope Valley by 10goals all this talk about points would be going on?

[Footy Chick]

I wonder if they didn't beat Hope Valley by 10goals all this talk about points would be going on?

I know, it's not like we're the team to beat at the minute

[S Demon]

I wonder if they didn't beat Hope Valley by 10goals all this talk about points would be going on?

Probably, considering it was people on here from other clubs who raised it

[carey]

I wonder if they didn't beat Hope Valley by 10goals all this talk about points would be going on?

Probably, considering it was people on here from other clubs who raised it

I certainly wasn't implying Hope Valley were whinging.

It just seems on here when ever someone has a good win its either 'They pay their player$ heap$' or they 'use that many points'

[The Bedge]

I wonder if they didn't beat Hope Valley by 10goals all this talk about points would be going on?

Probably, considering it was people on here from other clubs who raised it

It just seems on here when ever someone has a good win its either 'They pay their player$ heap$' or they 'use that many points'

Of course it would've received this talk - from a glance, Kenilworth had appeared to play 17 points during games.

There are sides such as Pulteney and Lockleys who are up the top and battling to manage their points, you don't think they would've made mention of it if they thought KFC were breaking the rules?

[S Demon]

I wonder if they didn't beat Hope Valley by 10goals all this talk about points would be going on?

Probably, considering it was people on here from other clubs who raised it

I certainly wasn't implying Hope Valley were whinging.

It just seems on here when ever someone has a good win its either 'They pay their player$ heap$' or they 'use that many points'

I think this is more a case of astute football people knowing which clubs are on the brink of 15 points and then when they then see an ex-AFL player rolled out in a team that's already heavily recruited, they take notice..

[The Bedge]

I know, it's not like we're the team to beat at the minute

You could be travelling worse...

[Footy Chick]

I know, it's not like we're the team to beat at the minute

You could be travelling worse...

what, 3.5% worse

[LaughingKookaburra]

I wonder if they didn't beat Hope Valley by 10goals all this talk about points would be going on?

Probably, considering it was people on here from other clubs who raised it

It just seems on here when ever someone has a good win its either 'They pay their player$ heap$' or they 'use that many points'

Of course it would've received this talk - from a glance, Kenilworth had appeared to play 17 points during games.

There are sides such as Pulteney and Lockleys who are up the top and battling to manage their points, you don't think they would've made mention of it if they thought KFC were breaking the rules?

The end of the day all information mentioned had been already forwarded and approved by the Adelaide Footy League prior to the matches taking place. 15 points were used on the weekend and whilst it’s an interesting point of discussion a lot of water goes under the bridge before these decisions are made.

[oldman]

It just seems on here when ever someone has a good win its either 'They pay their player$ heap$' or they 'use that many points'[/quote]
Of course it would've received this talk - from a glance, Kenilworth had appeared to play 17 points during games.

There are sides such as Pulteney and Lockleys who are up the top and battling to manage their points, you don't think they would've made mention of it if they thought KFC were breaking the rules?[/quote]

The end of the day all information mentioned had been already forwarded and approved by the Adelaide Footy League prior to the matches taking place. 15 points were used on the weekend and whilst it’s an interesting point of discussion a lot of water goes under the bridge before these decisions are made.[/quote

[LaughingKookaburra]

This was also presented and approved by the CFL. You are incorrect with the statement that the Kenilworth Football Club thinking that both players are zero points. One is worth 2 points, the other is worth zero.

We played with 15 points and did so following all required procedures that are available to all clubs. Cheers.

[oldman]

This was also presented and approved by the CFL. You are incorrect with the statement that the Kenilworth Football Club thinking that both players are zero points. One is worth 2 points, the other is worth zero.

We played with 15 points and did so following all required procedures that are available to all clubs. Cheers.

I thought the CFL needed to be informed the year prior to allow for any exemption if this is correct why was Zesers clearance only submitted in November 2017. He should be 2 points no matter what you think laughingkookabara

[LaughingKookaburra]

Never stated my thoughts mate relax.

[Lightning McQueen]

This was also presented and approved by the CFL. You are incorrect with the statement that the Kenilworth Football Club thinking that both players are zero points. One is worth 2 points, the other is worth zero.

We played with 15 points and did so following all required procedures that are available to all clubs. Cheers.

I thought the CFL needed to be informed the year prior to allow for any exemption if this is correct why was Zesers clearance only submitted in November 2017. He should be 2 points no matter what you think laughingkookabara

I take it you never graduated at Pulteney?

[S Demon]

This was also presented and approved by the CFL. You are incorrect with the statement that the Kenilworth Football Club thinking that both players are zero points. One is worth 2 points, the other is worth zero.

We played with 15 points and did so following all required procedures that are available to all clubs. Cheers.

Didn’t Broadview follow all the required procedures as well and still lose 2 points for a game?