jo172 wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:jo172 wrote:Footy Chick wrote:That also has it's dangers and do automatically ban someone, you'd need to come in with undeniable proof I'd think - rather than banishing someone based on almost heresay,
When you have the act on video it's a pretty bloody good start.
Hell, when two people are down one end of the field in 100 metres of space and one ends up unconscious or serverely injured it's a pretty good start.
Whilst the footage was damning, there is nothing showing any events leading up to the incident. Could be a retaliation incident?
I very much do not subscribe to any two wrongs make a right view.
Look Good In Leather wrote:jo172 wrote:Footy Chick wrote:That also has it's dangers and do automatically ban someone, you'd need to come in with undeniable proof I'd think - rather than banishing someone based on almost heresay,
When you have the act on video it's a pretty bloody good start.
Hell, when two people are down one end of the field in 100 metres of space and one ends up unconscious or serverely injured it's a pretty good start.
Whilst the footage was damning, there is nothing showing any events leading up to the incident. Could be a retaliation incident?
You know I like you LGIL but that is a pathetic statement. It's 2018 mate, not 1978 on a typically cold windy day at Bice Oval. But feel free to believe that every CBFC player suspension over the years that your player was actually the victim not the offender.