by Wedgie » Sun May 20, 2018 1:43 pm
by PatowalongaPirate » Sun May 20, 2018 1:50 pm
by am Bays » Sun May 20, 2018 1:52 pm
by Wedgie » Sun May 20, 2018 2:01 pm
am Bays wrote:This is the official SANFL last touch umpiring instruction video
As the Pirate says, it's has to be a clear last kick or handball for the last disposal law to be applied. At local footy level err on the side of "not a clear disposal" or "possibly touched" so throw it in please...
by PhilH » Sun May 20, 2018 2:08 pm
by Hazydog » Sun May 20, 2018 2:10 pm
by Wedgie » Sun May 20, 2018 2:12 pm
by Wedgie » Sun May 20, 2018 2:14 pm
Hazydog wrote:Yes, last intentional disposal (kick or handball) that goes out of bounds is penalised. If it goes out on the full off the boot accidentally that’s also a free, but if a ball is unintentionally deflected over the line off a boot and it’s not on the full it’s a boundary throw in.
Personally I think it is generally umpired very well, and despite initially being against the change, nowadays much prefer it to the lottery of deliberate out of bounds rule used in the AFL. At least it’s a black and white decision, and I like that aspect of it
by bennymacca » Sun May 20, 2018 3:56 pm
by goddy11 » Sun May 20, 2018 4:17 pm
PhilH wrote:Didn't see the 2 yesterday but my understanding is
Anytime if comes off the leg (below the knee) accidentally or otherwise ON THE FULL over the boundary it is a free.
Anytime it is a clear disposal (handball or kick) bouncing over the boundary it is a free.
Deflections, fumbles, ricochets bouncing over is a Throw In.
by heater31 » Sun May 20, 2018 4:25 pm
For the game Wedgie watched:bennymacca wrote:Question for people who watch more SANFL than me - does this rule lessen the impact of ruckmen as they don't have boundary throw-ins to contest?
by DOC » Sun May 20, 2018 4:33 pm
bennymacca wrote:Question for people who watch more SANFL than me - does this rule lessen the impact of ruckmen as they don't have boundary throw-ins to contest?
by Grenville » Sun May 20, 2018 4:55 pm
DOC wrote:bennymacca wrote:Question for people who watch more SANFL than me - does this rule lessen the impact of ruckmen as they don't have boundary throw-ins to contest?
Hard to answer, There is still a number of throw ins. Probably 8-12 frees that would have been throw ins.
BUT:
The rule has made the game better as we play more football rather than getting it out.
I think it is inevitable that this rule will be adopted by all. Not many liked it to start but it has gained favor.
by heater31 » Sun May 20, 2018 5:00 pm
Keeping the ball in play through the corridor is a load of crapGrenville wrote:DOC wrote:bennymacca wrote:Question for people who watch more SANFL than me - does this rule lessen the impact of ruckmen as they don't have boundary throw-ins to contest?
Hard to answer, There is still a number of throw ins. Probably 8-12 frees that would have been throw ins.
BUT:
The rule has made the game better as we play more football rather than getting it out.
I think it is inevitable that this rule will be adopted by all. Not many liked it to start but it has gained favor.
I must be in the minority then, I still think it's a load of crap.
by Spargo » Sun May 20, 2018 5:25 pm
by whufc » Sun May 20, 2018 7:13 pm
heater31 wrote:Keeping the ball in play through the corridor is a load of crapGrenville wrote:DOC wrote:bennymacca wrote:Question for people who watch more SANFL than me - does this rule lessen the impact of ruckmen as they don't have boundary throw-ins to contest?
Hard to answer, There is still a number of throw ins. Probably 8-12 frees that would have been throw ins.
BUT:
The rule has made the game better as we play more football rather than getting it out.
I think it is inevitable that this rule will be adopted by all. Not many liked it to start but it has gained favor.
I must be in the minority then, I still think it's a load of crap.
by TDJ44 » Sun May 20, 2018 7:47 pm
Grenville wrote:DOC wrote:bennymacca wrote:Question for people who watch more SANFL than me - does this rule lessen the impact of ruckmen as they don't have boundary throw-ins to contest?
Hard to answer, There is still a number of throw ins. Probably 8-12 frees that would have been throw ins.
BUT:
The rule has made the game better as we play more football rather than getting it out.
I think it is inevitable that this rule will be adopted by all. Not many liked it to start but it has gained favor.
I must be in the minority then, I still think it's a load of crap.
by johntheclaret » Sun May 20, 2018 8:57 pm
PhilH wrote:Didn't see the 2 yesterday but my understanding is
Anytime if comes off the leg (below the knee) accidentally or otherwise ON THE FULL over the boundary it is a free.
Anytime it is a clear disposal (handball or kick) bouncing over the boundary it is a free.
Deflections, fumbles, ricochets bouncing over is a Throw In.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |