by The Dark Knight » Wed Jun 20, 2018 6:36 am
by helicopterking » Wed Jun 20, 2018 6:47 am
by locky801 » Wed Jun 20, 2018 6:52 am
by bulldogproud » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:32 am
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:38 am
by Corona Man » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:43 am
bulldogproud wrote:I have a new favourite number: 481.
Come to think of it, 242 is not that bad a number either
Rule Britannia!!
by Armchair expert » Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:23 pm
by The Dark Knight » Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:13 pm
I'm just amazed England made 481! I literally thought it was a mistake when I first read it.Dogwatcher wrote:Are we really getting upset/disappointed about an ODI game?
It's barely relevant.
by heater31 » Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:17 pm
England lose to Scotland one week make 500 the nextThe Dark Knight wrote:I'm just amazed England made 481! I literally thought it was a mistake when I first read it.Dogwatcher wrote:Are we really getting upset/disappointed about an ODI game?
It's barely relevant.
by batmanbegins » Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:18 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:I'm just amazed England made 481! I literally thought it was a mistake when I first read it.Dogwatcher wrote:Are we really getting upset/disappointed about an ODI game?
It's barely relevant.
by batmanbegins » Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:20 pm
heater31 wrote:England lose to Scotland one week make 500 the nextThe Dark Knight wrote:I'm just amazed England made 481! I literally thought it was a mistake when I first read it.Dogwatcher wrote:Are we really getting upset/disappointed about an ODI game?
It's barely relevant.
by The Dark Knight » Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:25 pm
batmanbegins wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I'm just amazed England made 481! I literally thought it was a mistake when I first read it.Dogwatcher wrote:Are we really getting upset/disappointed about an ODI game?
It's barely relevant.
I'm happy we scored 481 against the aussies
In all seriousness the game is irrelevant though as the aussies have there second string bowling line up. The only thing it does show is bowling depth is not quite yet there. I'm amazed Nathan Lyon can't get a gig, he's by far your best spinner. Also why is Khawaja not in this one day side? He's been very good at state level for years in one dayers, yet Short has one good T20 tournament and is in.
by heater31 » Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:29 pm
At least when we lost to Bangladesh, Andrew Symonds was still pissed from the night before.....what's England's excuse?batmanbegins wrote:heater31 wrote:England lose to Scotland one week make 500 the nextThe Dark Knight wrote:I'm just amazed England made 481! I literally thought it was a mistake when I first read it.Dogwatcher wrote:Are we really getting upset/disappointed about an ODI game?
It's barely relevant.
That was a bad loss for us but it was an anomaly. Our one day form has been superb in the past few years and we are the number 1 ranked team in the world for a reason and you guys have a second string team.
by daysofourlives » Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:07 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:batmanbegins wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I'm just amazed England made 481! I literally thought it was a mistake when I first read it.Dogwatcher wrote:Are we really getting upset/disappointed about an ODI game?
It's barely relevant.
I'm happy we scored 481 against the aussies
In all seriousness the game is irrelevant though as the aussies have there second string bowling line up. The only thing it does show is bowling depth is not quite yet there. I'm amazed Nathan Lyon can't get a gig, he's by far your best spinner. Also why is Khawaja not in this one day side? He's been very good at state level for years in one dayers, yet Short has one good T20 tournament and is in.
Bowling depth has been exposed but I guess getting games into the next tier isn't a bad thing. Lyon has to play though, always been a very economical one day bowler. And I guess it's down to Short being young and they want to blood the youth in preperation for future World Cups instead of going back to someone like Khawaja.
by The Dark Knight » Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:13 pm
daysofourlives wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:batmanbegins wrote:I'm just amazed England made 481! I literally thought it was a mistake when I first read it.The Dark Knight wrote:[quote="Dogwatcher"]Are we really getting upset/disappointed about an ODI game?
It's barely relevant.
I'm happy we scored 481 against the aussies
In all seriousness the game is irrelevant though as the aussies have there second string bowling line up. The only thing it does show is bowling depth is not quite yet there. I'm amazed Nathan Lyon can't get a gig, he's by far your best spinner. Also why is Khawaja not in this one day side? He's been very good at state level for years in one dayers, yet Short has one good T20 tournament and is in.
Bowling depth has been exposed but I guess getting games into the next tier isn't a bad thing. Lyon has to play though, always been a very economical one day bowler. And I guess it's down to Short being young and they want to blood the youth in preperation for future World Cups instead of going back to someone like Khawaja.
by Corona Man » Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:14 pm
by PatowalongaPirate » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:15 pm
bulldogproud wrote:I have a new favourite number: 481.
Come to think of it, 242 is not that bad a number either
Rule Britannia!!
by robranisgod » Thu Jun 21, 2018 12:52 am
batmanbegins wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I'm just amazed England made 481! I literally thought it was a mistake when I first read it.Dogwatcher wrote:Are we really getting upset/disappointed about an ODI game?
It's barely relevant.
I'm happy we scored 481 against the aussies
In all seriousness the game is irrelevant though as the aussies have there second string bowling line up. The only thing it does show is bowling depth is not quite yet there. I'm amazed Nathan Lyon can't get a gig, he's by far your best spinner. Also why is Khawaja not in this one day side? He's been very good at state level for years in one dayers, yet Short has one good T20 tournament and is in.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jun 21, 2018 9:58 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Are we really getting upset/disappointed about an ODI game?
It's barely relevant.
by Dogwatcher » Thu Jun 21, 2018 10:02 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Are we really getting upset/disappointed about an ODI game?
It's barely relevant.
LOL.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |