Preliminary Final

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby GMcG » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:22 am

LMA wrote:
Aerie wrote:
Magellan wrote:Who was the extra player?

Jarrod Allmond


He must be going nuts

he's now a mere shell of a man
GMcG
Under 16s
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:58 pm
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 45 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Wedgie » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:27 am

What sort of penalty Seb Guilhaus will get for publicly stating the umpiring was rigged by the SANFL?
Pretty heavy stuff possibly warranting deregistering and possibly even a law suit with that sort of defamation. :shock:
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 50782
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2021 times
Been liked: 3862 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:31 am

wild dog wrote:I can't understand how the SANFL is being labelled as the chief villain. The main party at fault is Norf, it is their responsibility to have the correct number of players on the field. The Eagles should have looked at the rule book and demanded the count, but the SANFL is the last of the 3 parties (or 4 if you want to include the umpires as separate) to be held responsible.

Agree SANFL have set the rules are they are in black and white. North failed to comply by having too many players on the ground. Eagles didn't follow the correct process. Play on.
Senor Moto Gadili
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3611
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:52 pm
Has liked: 206 times
Been liked: 532 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby daysofourlives » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:34 am

It occured to me that this wont be able to happen from next year with the 666 formation. It will be picked up instantly and a free kick paid
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019
Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
daysofourlives
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11500
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:35 pm
Has liked: 2415 times
Been liked: 1657 times
Grassroots Team: Angaston

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Psyber » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:43 am

I'd favour cacelling any scores by North in that period. It is their responsibility to get their player management right regardless of technical and procedural debate above.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12212
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 389 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby GMcG » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:52 am

Psyber wrote:I'd favour cacelling any scores by North in that period. It is their responsibility to get their player management right regardless of technical and procedural debate above.

Yep, the interchange steward obviously cheated, so did the 2 sitting on the bench, SURELY they wondered where the 3rd player was??
GMcG
Under 16s
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:58 pm
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 45 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby FlyingHigh » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:53 am

Psyber wrote:I'd favour cacelling any scores by North in that period. It is their responsibility to get their player management right regardless of technical and procedural debate above.


What happens if they were defending the lead and didn't/not try to score? How do you quantify that?
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4832
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 81 times
Been liked: 173 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby FlyingHigh » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:53 am

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
wild dog wrote:I can't understand how the SANFL is being labelled as the chief villain. The main party at fault is Norf, it is their responsibility to have the correct number of players on the field. The Eagles should have looked at the rule book and demanded the count, but the SANFL is the last of the 3 parties (or 4 if you want to include the umpires as separate) to be held responsible.

Agree SANFL have set the rules are they are in black and white. North failed to comply by having too many players on the ground. Eagles didn't follow the correct process. Play on.


Absolutely
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4832
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 81 times
Been liked: 173 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby bulldogproud » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:56 am

In light of the two sides playing in this week's game, the Grand Final is now being brought to you by Ashley Madison.
Cheers
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: West Beach
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 401 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Dutchy » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:57 am

Unless they can prove some INTENT of North to deliberately play with 19 then it is a non issue.
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 44455
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2311 times
Been liked: 3482 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Jim05 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:58 am

Psyber wrote:I'd favour cacelling any scores by North in that period. It is their responsibility to get their player management right regardless of technical and procedural debate above.

The 1.3 that North scored would have added some time on to the game and being that the Eagles scored a goal with only seconds remaining do we then discount that goal?
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 47104
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1125 times
Been liked: 3534 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby tipper » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:59 am

GMcG wrote:
Psyber wrote:I'd favour cacelling any scores by North in that period. It is their responsibility to get their player management right regardless of technical and procedural debate above.

Yep, the interchange steward obviously cheated, so did the 2 sitting on the bench, SURELY they wondered where the 3rd player was??
The two on the bench were injured werent they? May have been receiving treatment, or down in the rooms and not noticed

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
tipper
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2854
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:45 am
Has liked: 359 times
Been liked: 531 times
Grassroots Team: Peake

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby StrayDog » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:00 pm

Psyber wrote:I'd favour cacelling any scores by North in that period. It is their responsibility to get their player management right regardless of technical and procedural debate above.

Would be a popular choice I'd say, considering an attacking advantage for that period. Perhaps an additional scoring penalty might apply considering that there was a potential effect on the opponent's ability to score as well :?: Food for thought.

Through a friend that was listening to the ABC this morning, I heard that the Eagles only became aware of the extra man when C7 alerted them to it. Can anyone confirm this? Not sure if it's already been mentioned.
"— here I opened wide the door; —
Darkness there, and nothing more."


- Edgar Allan Poe from " The Raven "

StrayDog
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:26 pm
Location: Copping a "feel for the game"
Has liked: 1132 times
Been liked: 192 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Half Back Flanker » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:09 pm

StrayDog wrote:
Psyber wrote:I'd favour cacelling any scores by North in that period. It is their responsibility to get their player management right regardless of technical and procedural debate above.

Would be a popular choice I'd say, considering an attacking advantage for that period. Perhaps an additional scoring penalty might apply considering that there was a potential effect on the opponent's ability to score as well :?: Food for thought.

Through a friend that was listening to the ABC this morning, I heard that the Eagles only became aware of the extra man when C7 alerted them to it. Can anyone confirm this? Not sure if it's already been mentioned.


100% not true
“When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less.”
User avatar
Half Back Flanker
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:26 pm
Has liked: 429 times
Been liked: 167 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Spargo » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:14 pm

What if you’ve backed the Eagles, will Ubet, Sportsbet etc pay out if the result is overturned?
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ

Don’t lose your grip on the dreams of the past
You must fight just to keep them alive...
Spargo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15877
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:42 pm
Location: Getting out of Dodge
Has liked: 5457 times
Been liked: 5089 times
Grassroots Team: Sacred Heart OC

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby StrayDog » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:19 pm

Half Back Flanker wrote:
StrayDog wrote:
Through a friend that was listening to the ABC this morning, I heard that the Eagles only became aware of the extra man when C7 alerted them to it. Can anyone confirm this? Not sure if it's already been mentioned.


100% not true

Thanks HBF.
"— here I opened wide the door; —
Darkness there, and nothing more."


- Edgar Allan Poe from " The Raven "

StrayDog
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:26 pm
Location: Copping a "feel for the game"
Has liked: 1132 times
Been liked: 192 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Aerie » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:30 pm

For 115 minutes when it was 18 vs 18, Eagles 95 to North 92.
For 5 minutes when it was 19 vs 18, North 8 to Eagles 0.

The only solution that sits right with me, is a full replay next Sunday.
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5585
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 147 times
Been liked: 503 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby locky801 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:32 pm

Aerie wrote:For 115 minutes when it was 18 vs 18, Eagles 95 to North 92.
For 5 minutes when it was 19 vs 18, North 8 to Eagles 0.

The only solution that sits right with me, is a full replay next Sunday.


Interesting
You cant change your past but you can sure hell shape you future
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 55751
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 3647 times
Been liked: 1160 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby RB » Mon Sep 17, 2018 1:00 pm

Aerie wrote:For 115 minutes when it was 18 vs 18, Eagles 95 to North 92.
For 5 minutes when it was 19 vs 18, North 8 to Eagles 0.

The only solution that sits right with me, is a full replay next Sunday.
Bit unfair on Norwood, making them wait three weeks between games.

Having said that I don't think either NA or WWT could complain too much if a replay was ordered.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
RB
Coach
 
Posts: 5628
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:45 pm
Has liked: 759 times
Been liked: 1073 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Half Back Flanker » Mon Sep 17, 2018 1:00 pm

RB wrote:
Aerie wrote:For 115 minutes when it was 18 vs 18, Eagles 95 to North 92.
For 5 minutes when it was 19 vs 18, North 8 to Eagles 0.

The only solution that sits right with me, is a full replay next Sunday.
Bit unfair on Norwood, making them wait three weeks between games.

Having said that I don't think either NA or WWT could complain too much if a replay was ordered.


A replay would be the fairest option
“When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less.”
User avatar
Half Back Flanker
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:26 pm
Has liked: 429 times
Been liked: 167 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |