Preliminary Final

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Lightning McQueen » Mon Sep 17, 2018 1:51 pm

Magellan wrote:
knowledge wrote:Someone, claiming to be an WWT member has posted on 'Adelaide Now' that they have received an email from WWT that the club's lawyers have served papers on the SANFL at midday today. Kind of appropriate. A high noon stoush! Strap yourself in and get ready for the ride! It's about to get supercharged...... Rob Gerard will be on the phone to Greg Griifin right now!

Can someone from the Eagles camp post that email? Very interesting developments, if true.

This is on their website:

The club is disappointed at the result of yesterday’s Preliminary Final against North Adelaide.

During the first four minutes of the final quarter the coaching staff became aware of the fact that North Adelaide had 19 players on the field. Several on ground officials were immediately advised of the discrepancy.

As a result of this the Club, in consultation with our lawyers, have agreed to write to the SANFL citing law 5.1 of the Laws of the Game.

This correspondence with SANFL is to be lodged by midday today. The Club is waiting for a response regarding the breach. At the moment SANFL is still investigating the incident.

We will keep members and supporters informed on the progress of this matter.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51284
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4339 times
Been liked: 7902 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Magellan » Mon Sep 17, 2018 1:51 pm

SANFL STATEMENT – PRELIMINARY FINAL

The issue of North Adelaide Football Club having 19 players on the field during yesterday’s preliminary final against Woodville West Torrens has been referred to the SA Football Commission.

The Commission – the governing body of SANFL – will meet this afternoon to be briefed on the matter before deciding on the next step in the process for SANFL to reach an outcome.

No further updates from SANFL will be available until after this.

http://sanfl.com.au/news/2018/09/17/san ... ary-final/
"Religion is like a blind man looking in a black room for a black cat that isn't there...and finding it." - Oscar Wilde
User avatar
Magellan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5981
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:04 pm
Location: Four Seasons Total Landscaping
Has liked: 757 times
Been liked: 1517 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Bombers4EVA » Mon Sep 17, 2018 1:51 pm

Booney wrote:Luke Powell, WWT football boss, confirmed they approached SANFL staff about the extra man but could not arrange a message to the captain before the extra player came off the ground.

Then as the rules state nothing can become of it. The rule says that the captain or acting captain has to make the call to the on-field umpire.
Bombers4EVA
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:05 am
Has liked: 326 times
Been liked: 89 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Lightning McQueen » Mon Sep 17, 2018 1:52 pm

Thoughts @Bombers4EVA?
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51284
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4339 times
Been liked: 7902 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby gadj1976 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 1:54 pm

Bombers4EVA wrote:
Booney wrote:Luke Powell, WWT football boss, confirmed they approached SANFL staff about the extra man but could not arrange a message to the captain before the extra player came off the ground.

Then as the rules state nothing can become of it. The rule says that the captain or acting captain has to make the call to the on-field umpire.


End of story IMO!
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9143
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 795 times
Been liked: 849 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby MAY-Z » Mon Sep 17, 2018 1:54 pm

Bombers4EVA wrote:
Booney wrote:Luke Powell, WWT football boss, confirmed they approached SANFL staff about the extra man but could not arrange a message to the captain before the extra player came off the ground.

Then as the rules state nothing can become of it. The rule says that the captain or acting captain has to make the call to the on-field umpire.


the rules also stated at the time that the match is complete when the umpire hears the siren.

the AFL commission overruled in that instance and made the appropriate rule amendments, so i dont see why the same cant happen here
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Alby_Green » Mon Sep 17, 2018 1:59 pm

MAY-Z wrote:the rules also stated at the time that the match is complete when the umpire hears the siren.

the AFL commission overruled in that instance and made the appropriate rule amendments, so i dont see why the same cant happen here

Do you mean the St Kilda v Fremantle draw in Launceston that was overturned days after the match & the win awarded to Freo?
Alby_Green
Member
 
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 5 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Pseudo » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:03 pm

ABC news: SANFL confirms North Adelaide had an extra player on the field in preliminary final

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-17/s ... l/10254430

From the article:

Eagles chief executive Luke Powell said the points scored by North Adelaide during those controversial five minutes should not be counted.
"The SANFL has got to put what's best for the integrity of the competition, and until that happens we can't really say what we'd like too much," he said.


All of a sudden integrity is important? :lol:
Last edited by Pseudo on Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11773
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1553 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby MAY-Z » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:03 pm

Alby_Green wrote:
MAY-Z wrote:the rules also stated at the time that the match is complete when the umpire hears the siren.

the AFL commission overruled in that instance and made the appropriate rule amendments, so i dont see why the same cant happen here

Do you mean the St Kilda v Fremantle draw in Launceston that was overturned days after the match & the win awarded to Freo?


yes
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Pseudo » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:07 pm

Booney wrote:SANFL have handed it over to the SA Football Commission who will be briefed this afternoon.

Image
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11773
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1553 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby woodublieve12 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:08 pm

Magellan wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:Without scrolling through the pages, did the captain ask for a head count?

The short answer is no.

Than what’s the issue? North win and advance. Simples
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17205
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3016 times
Been liked: 2384 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Booney » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:17 pm

Anyone else sensing a replay?
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58211
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7467 times
Been liked: 10755 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Half Back Flanker » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:19 pm

Booney wrote:Anyone else sensing a replay?



That would be the fairest option i believe.....
“When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less.”
User avatar
Half Back Flanker
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:26 pm
Has liked: 429 times
Been liked: 167 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby carey » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:21 pm

Half Back Flanker wrote:
Booney wrote:Anyone else sensing a replay?



That would be the fairest option i believe.....



Not in a million years will this happen
you've gota keep on keep'n on .........
User avatar
carey
Coach
 
 
Posts: 21002
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: From a place i shouldn't be.
Has liked: 2796 times
Been liked: 2985 times
Grassroots Team: Paralowie

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Dogs64 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:23 pm

Pseudo wrote:ABC news: SANFL confirms North Adelaide had an extra player on the field in preliminary final

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-17/s ... l/10254430

From the article:

Eagles chief executive Luke Powell said the points scored by North Adelaide during those controversial five minutes should not be counted.
"The SANFL has got to put what's best for the integrity of the competition, and until that happens we can't really say what we'd like too much," he said.


All of a sudden integrity is important? :lol:


Agreed, hilarious the Eagles are now concerned about the integrity of the competition. Even funnier they think the SANFL should be for once.
Dogs64
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 385
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am
Has liked: 309 times
Been liked: 177 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Killa » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:29 pm

gadj1976 wrote:
Bombers4EVA wrote:
Booney wrote:Luke Powell, WWT football boss, confirmed they approached SANFL staff about the extra man but could not arrange a message to the captain before the extra player came off the ground.

Then as the rules state nothing can become of it. The rule says that the captain or acting captain has to make the call to the on-field umpire.


End of story IMO!

Not really, if the Interchange steward and 4th umpire has reported it. Then 7.2b comes in to play but the rules are not clear given the delay on the decision. Under 7.2b it can be a fine, reversal of match or alternative penalty.
Killa
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:43 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: South Augusta

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby another grub » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:38 pm

Cant be a replay, just make a FAIR decision and get on with it..... I honestly beleive that amount of time with an extra player is too much to ignore. Eagles thru. ......however i have a feeling the result will stand.

To play in GF
Nth $1.33
EA $3
User avatar
another grub
Coach
 
Posts: 11154
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:02 am
Has liked: 432 times
Been liked: 402 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Lightning McQueen » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:40 pm

Half Back Flanker wrote:
Booney wrote:Anyone else sensing a replay?



That would be the fairest option i believe.....

The fairest option would be to remove what North scored during their time of infringing, not that I think it should occur, i don't think making Norwood wait an extra week is the answer.

Just such a bizarre set of circumstances at this level.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51284
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4339 times
Been liked: 7902 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Lightning McQueen » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:41 pm

another grub wrote:Cant be a replay, just make a FAIR decision and get on with it..... I honestly beleive that amount of time with an extra player is too much to ignore. Eagles thru. ......however i have a feeling the result will stand.

To play in GF
Nth $1.33
EA $3

I agree.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51284
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4339 times
Been liked: 7902 times

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Postby Whos ya daddy » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:42 pm

Killa wrote:
gadj1976 wrote:
Bombers4EVA wrote:
Booney wrote:Luke Powell, WWT football boss, confirmed they approached SANFL staff about the extra man but could not arrange a message to the captain before the extra player came off the ground.

Then as the rules state nothing can become of it. The rule says that the captain or acting captain has to make the call to the on-field umpire.


End of story IMO!

Not really, if the Interchange steward and 4th umpire has reported it. Then 7.2b comes in to play but the rules are not clear given the delay on the decision. Under 7.2b it can be a fine, reversal of match or alternative penalty.



If lawyers get involved they will rip this clause to threads as its badly written which the lawyers will love.
The rule reads like this.

7.2 PROCEDURE FOR INTERCHANGE
The following procedure shall apply to the interchange of Players during
a Match who are listed on the Team Sheet:
(a) unless Law 7.3 applies, the Players intending to interchange shall
leave and enter the Playing Surface through the Interchange Area
;
(b) where a Player does not leave or enter the Playing Surface as specified
under Law 7.2 (a), the Interchange Steward and/or a field Umpire shall
report the circumstances to the Controlling Body, including the scores at
the time. The Controlling Body may determine the matter by way of fine,
reversal of Match result or other sanction as it deems appropriate.

The bit in bold is the bit that will get North off the hook. As long as the 19th player came off through the interchange gate, I don't think rule 7.2(b) can come into play which means there can't be a reversal of results.
Unless the SANFL change the wording of the rule which would then get appealed by North in court and most likely get overturned.
Whos ya daddy
Member
 
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:55 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |