LMA wrote:Atley will be a regular without Polec or Chingard
Hope he plays well in losing sides........
#DepartureClub
by amber_fluid » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:20 pm
LMA wrote:Atley will be a regular without Polec or Chingard
by carey » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:33 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Brodlach wrote:Joe Atley and Jarrod Lienert have signed two-year extensions at Port Adelaide until the end of 2020
Cutla big fish there!
by carey » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 pm
amber_fluid wrote:LMA wrote:Atley will be a regular without Polec or Chingard
Hope he plays well in losing sides........
#DepartureClub
by amber_fluid » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:44 pm
carey wrote:amber_fluid wrote:LMA wrote:Atley will be a regular without Polec or Chingard
Hope he plays well in losing sides........
#DepartureClub
Murphy, Betts, Gibbs, Kennedy
The list goes on and on
by Booney » Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:08 am
by UK Fan » Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:48 am
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by bertiebeatle » Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:51 am
UK Fan wrote:Booney wrote:Wingard won't be going anywhere.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-tr ... 44acc2cc91
by Brodlach » Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:55 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by The Bedge » Wed Sep 19, 2018 10:27 am
Brodlach wrote:Good player who has been an All Australian but if they can get pick 6 in this “super draft” I think that’s a win for Port. It helps the salary cap pressure too if there is some
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by JK » Wed Sep 19, 2018 10:44 am
Booney wrote:Lienert showed some real poise with the ball in hand and, more importantly for our back half, the ability to kick the ball to one of his own teammates. Was an interesting to see that happen down back.
by Booney » Wed Sep 19, 2018 10:44 am
by The Bedge » Wed Sep 19, 2018 10:50 am
Booney wrote:The other one is Ben King, he could be a longer term key forward prospect and might be more likely to be available at 5,6 or 7.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Bedge » Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:00 am
Booney wrote:If we could get in a position to secure Lukosuis and it was at the expense of Wingard I'd still be filthy but could see the longer term value in it.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Booney » Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:08 am
The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:If we could get in a position to secure Lukosuis and it was at the expense of Wingard I'd still be filthy but could see the longer term value in it.
Whilst you may see the value long term in it, how do you think the mass member base would see it? Thickle bunch who are desperate to see some immediate on field success, if you have a KPP sitting in the wings for a few years developing and the side is underperforming, it'll only end up worse for Port IMO.
AFL these days like it or not is mostly built on the now, not the long term - Port have deficiencies in their squad, they need to address these first and foremost.
by JK » Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:13 am
The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:If we could get in a position to secure Lukosuis and it was at the expense of Wingard I'd still be filthy but could see the longer term value in it.
Whilst you may see the value long term in it, how do you think the mass member base would see it? Thickle bunch who are desperate to see some immediate on field success, if you have a KPP sitting in the wings for a few years developing and the side is underperforming, it'll only end up worse for Port IMO.
AFL these days like it or not is mostly built on the now, not the long term - Port have deficiencies in their squad, they need to address these first and foremost.
by mots02 » Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:22 am
The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:If we could get in a position to secure Lukosuis and it was at the expense of Wingard I'd still be filthy but could see the longer term value in it.
Whilst you may see the value long term in it, how do you think the mass member base would see it? Thickle bunch who are desperate to see some immediate on field success, if you have a KPP sitting in the wings for a few years developing and the side is underperforming, it'll only end up worse for Port IMO.
AFL these days like it or not is mostly built on the now, not the long term - Port have deficiencies in their squad, they need to address these first and foremost.
by The Bedge » Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:25 am
mots02 wrote:I know the ave IQ of the Alberton crowd is probably on the low end of the curve but calling your own thick is a bit harsh isn't?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by mots02 » Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:34 am
The Bedge wrote:mots02 wrote:I know the ave IQ of the Alberton crowd is probably on the low end of the curve but calling your own thick is a bit harsh isn't?
... if the shoe fits..
by Booney » Wed Sep 19, 2018 1:10 pm
mots02 wrote:The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:If we could get in a position to secure Lukosuis and it was at the expense of Wingard I'd still be filthy but could see the longer term value in it.
Whilst you may see the value long term in it, how do you think the mass member base would see it? Thickle bunch who are desperate to see some immediate on field success, if you have a KPP sitting in the wings for a few years developing and the side is underperforming, it'll only end up worse for Port IMO.
AFL these days like it or not is mostly built on the now, not the long term - Port have deficiencies in their squad, they need to address these first and foremost.
I know the ave IQ of the Alberton crowd is probably on the low end of the curve but calling your own thick is a bit harsh isn't?
by mots02 » Wed Sep 19, 2018 1:18 pm
Booney wrote:mots02 wrote:The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:If we could get in a position to secure Lukosuis and it was at the expense of Wingard I'd still be filthy but could see the longer term value in it.
Whilst you may see the value long term in it, how do you think the mass member base would see it? Thickle bunch who are desperate to see some immediate on field success, if you have a KPP sitting in the wings for a few years developing and the side is underperforming, it'll only end up worse for Port IMO.
AFL these days like it or not is mostly built on the now, not the long term - Port have deficiencies in their squad, they need to address these first and foremost.
I know the ave IQ of the Alberton crowd is probably on the low end of the curve but calling your own thick is a bit harsh isn't?
Low end of the curve, is that the same as the Northern end of Unley Oval?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |