The Dark Knight wrote:Pakistan 2/144 at stumps, lead by 281.
plenty enough on the board may as well declare overnight
by locky801 » Thu Oct 18, 2018 12:31 am
The Dark Knight wrote:Pakistan 2/144 at stumps, lead by 281.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 18, 2018 7:53 am
jackpot jim wrote:UTTER FARCE this LBW 3m rule cant be given out by DRS
Azhar looked absolutely PLUMB lbw to Holland despite coming well forward.
Ball tracking showed hitting MIDDLE stump HALF WAY UP !!!!!!
Not Out bcos impact was a bees dick outside 3 metres it was determined.
Impact about 2 inches closer to stumps and its given out.
So its not out bcos over 3 metres theirs supposedly too much margin for error to me sure.
So at 299 cm theres NO DOUBT its smashing into middle but at 301 cm theres doubt that it could miss.
So within 2 cm they are saying the accuracy could be out by about 5 inches, enough doubt that the ball could miss the stumps.
Theres simply no logic in that all !!!
by whufc » Thu Oct 18, 2018 8:22 am
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:11 am
whufc wrote:Time to play the kids that show promise.
by PatowalongaPirate » Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:20 am
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:29 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Ideally Renshaw opens and Usman bats at 3.
Are we going to reward Shield form for our home Test series, or will they keep picking the same under performing batsmen?
Alex Doolan just made a Ton opening for Tassie.
Will Pucovski just smashed 243 for the Vics batting at 3.
by The Bedge » Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:39 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Will Pucovski just smashed 243 for the Vics batting at 3.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by PatowalongaPirate » Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:42 am
The Bedge wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Will Pucovski just smashed 243 for the Vics batting at 3.
Pucovski probably a little young still - he's only 18 or 19 isn't he?
by The Bedge » Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:46 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:The Bedge wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Will Pucovski just smashed 243 for the Vics batting at 3.
Pucovski probably a little young still - he's only 18 or 19 isn't he?
My point being are we going to reward form or surnames?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:14 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:My point being are we going to reward form or surnames?
by David Brent » Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:58 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:The Bedge wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Will Pucovski just smashed 243 for the Vics batting at 3.
Pucovski probably a little young still - he's only 18 or 19 isn't he?
My point being are we going to reward form or surnames?
by Booney » Thu Oct 18, 2018 1:51 pm
by PatowalongaPirate » Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:00 pm
David Brent wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:The Bedge wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Will Pucovski just smashed 243 for the Vics batting at 3.
Pucovski probably a little young still - he's only 18 or 19 isn't he?
My point being are we going to reward form or surnames?
He's 20 & that was his second First Class ton I believe. Name or no name but if were picking blokes with 2 FC centuries as test batsmen were in trouble. If he reels off another 2 or 3 this year then lets look at him.
Kids a talent & has been talked up for years, probably the most hyped bat on the scene since M Clarke & P Hughes but without looking the stats up I'd say both had a lot more runs on the board before they were selected.
by PatowalongaPirate » Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:03 pm
Booney wrote:Makes me sad to say it but I really don't care that we are shit.
I'm still hurting from the culture that festered within the side that thought we'd get away with bullying a young bloke into sand papering the ball in a crucial Test match and when one of our selectors ( Mark Waugh ) says he doesn't know much about one of the guys playing ( Labuschagne's bowling ) it shows how shit we are.
Impossible to support the a structure that continues to pick Shaun Marsh and Peter ******* Siddle when we need to see cultural and generational change.
One bloke I am backing is Tim Paine. He's got his heart and head in the right place and I'm backing him to pull us out of this mess in the short term.
by heater31 » Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:04 pm
PatowalongaPirate wrote:David Brent wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:The Bedge wrote:[quote="PatowalongaPirate"]Will Pucovski just smashed 243 for the Vics batting at 3.
Pucovski probably a little young still - he's only 18 or 19 isn't he?
My point being are we going to reward form or surnames?
He's 20 & that was his second First Class ton I believe. Name or no name but if were picking blokes with 2 FC centuries as test batsmen were in trouble. If he reels off another 2 or 3 this year then lets look at him.
Kids a talent & has been talked up for years, probably the most hyped bat on the scene since M Clarke & P Hughes but without looking the stats up I'd say both had a lot more runs on the board before they were selected.
by Booney » Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:05 pm
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Booney wrote:Makes me sad to say it but I really don't care that we are shit.
I'm still hurting from the culture that festered within the side that thought we'd get away with bullying a young bloke into sand papering the ball in a crucial Test match and when one of our selectors ( Mark Waugh ) says he doesn't know much about one of the guys playing ( Labuschagne's bowling ) it shows how shit we are.
Impossible to support the a structure that continues to pick Shaun Marsh and Peter ******* Siddle when we need to see cultural and generational change.
One bloke I am backing is Tim Paine. He's got his heart and head in the right place and I'm backing him to pull us out of this mess in the short term.
Mark Waugh isn't a selector anymore. It's only Hohns, Chappell and Langer I believe.
The Peter Siddle selection is one of the most baffling decisions in recent memory.
by RB » Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:19 pm
PatowalongaPirate wrote:The Peter Siddle selection is one of the most baffling decisions in recent memory.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:26 pm
RB wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:The Peter Siddle selection is one of the most baffling decisions in recent memory.
I was surprised he was picked for the squad, but when the other two seam bowlers are Neser and Doggett, picking Siddle makes perfect sense.
by locky801 » Thu Oct 18, 2018 3:58 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Time to play the kids that show promise.
Or alternatively, the 11 most in-form players.
I'm not sure there would be more than 4 or 5 in that category that are in the current team.
Khwaja: Yes, but at 3 for mine
Finch: Hard to judge without some recent research in the longer format
S.Marsh: No
M.Marsh: No, triple no for being number 4, in my day it was your best batsmen's spot.
Head: 50/50, but I'm biased.
Labrat: No
Paine: 50/50
Starc: Yes
Lyon: Yes
Siddle: No
Holland: No
by northerner » Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:36 pm
locky801 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Time to play the kids that show promise.
Or alternatively, the 11 most in-form players.
I'm not sure there would be more than 4 or 5 in that category that are in the current team.
Khwaja: Yes, but at 3 for mine
Finch: Hard to judge without some recent research in the longer format
S.Marsh: No
M.Marsh: No, triple no for being number 4, in my day it was your best batsmen's spot.
Head: 50/50, but I'm biased.
Labrat: No
Paine: 50/50
Starc: Yes
Lyon: Yes
Siddle: No
Holland: No
Nothing more certain than come Australia Tests at home that one S. Marsh will be there and i dont mean as a spectator
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |