Q. wrote:Its behind a paywall. But I've read others like it where they include removing negative gearing, removing franking credit tax refunds etc. as "new taxes" in the 200bn - which is shoddy journalismJimmy_041 wrote:Q. wrote:What new taxes might these be?Jimmy_041 wrote:It’s not before the election we have to worry about.
It’s the $200bn in new and increased taxes afterwards
Bowen thinks he’s a reincarnation of Keating - he wants the second “recession we had to have”
You sound like a Murdoch hack with the recession fear mongering
Keep the personal abuse out of it thanks Q
As far as I know, the Financial Review is not owned by Murdoch
https://www.afr.com/news/economy/chris- ... 122-h1abj4
The last Labor govt saved us from a recession, so it's just pure fear mongering to suggest that electing them will lead to one
Well they said they did (save us from one).
I was never quite conviinced it was necessary and I remember Paul Keating did not act similarly when we were facing one during his time in power...