Bum Crack wrote:Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Only 2 sides can win the flag, the rest of us are middle table rubbish
Collingwood ahead of Geelong with GWS the wild card. That's it.
Geez a bit early to call that.
Anyone else truly in it in your view?
by Booney » Mon May 06, 2019 9:19 am
Bum Crack wrote:Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Only 2 sides can win the flag, the rest of us are middle table rubbish
Collingwood ahead of Geelong with GWS the wild card. That's it.
Geez a bit early to call that.
by JK » Mon May 06, 2019 9:20 am
by Booney » Mon May 06, 2019 10:05 am
by PatowalongaPirate » Mon May 06, 2019 10:09 am
Booney wrote:Looking forward to the umpiring department coming out and telling us the Betts non-holding the ball call in the third quarter was the right decision this afternoon.
In 2 hours yesterday afternoon the umpires completely re-wrote the holding the ball interpretation. Is this what we can expect for the rest of the year now?
by DOC » Mon May 06, 2019 10:20 am
by stan » Mon May 06, 2019 10:22 am
Nah mate just hard to play well when ya still a bit pissed.Booney wrote:JK wrote:Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Only 2 sides can win the flag, the rest of us are middle table rubbish
Collingwood ahead of Geelong with GWS the wild card. That's it.
Long way to go, I’d think West Coast may well recover and there’s some chance another club or two could emerge
West Coast look like the Lycett and Le Cras loss is really hurting them.
by stan » Mon May 06, 2019 10:22 am
Put Richmond in there as well. Still a good side and had an average day against the dogs. Will be tough to beat at the MCG.JK wrote:Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Only 2 sides can win the flag, the rest of us are middle table rubbish
Collingwood ahead of Geelong with GWS the wild card. That's it.
Long way to go, I’d think West Coast may well recover and there’s some chance another club or two could emerge
by Booney » Mon May 06, 2019 10:26 am
stan wrote:Put Richmond in there as well. Still a good side and had an average day against the dogs. Will be tough to beat at the MCG.JK wrote:Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Only 2 sides can win the flag, the rest of us are middle table rubbish
Collingwood ahead of Geelong with GWS the wild card. That's it.
Long way to go, I’d think West Coast may well recover and there’s some chance another club or two could emerge
by MW » Mon May 06, 2019 10:28 am
Booney wrote:Looking forward to the umpiring department coming out and telling us the Betts non-holding the ball call in the third quarter was the right decision this afternoon.
In 2 hours yesterday afternoon the umpires completely re-wrote the holding the ball interpretation. Is this what we can expect for the rest of the year now?
by Bum Crack » Mon May 06, 2019 10:32 am
Booney wrote:Bum Crack wrote:Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Only 2 sides can win the flag, the rest of us are middle table rubbish
Collingwood ahead of Geelong with GWS the wild card. That's it.
Geez a bit early to call that.
Anyone else truly in it in your view?
by Booney » Mon May 06, 2019 10:50 am
MW wrote:Booney wrote:Looking forward to the umpiring department coming out and telling us the Betts non-holding the ball call in the third quarter was the right decision this afternoon.
In 2 hours yesterday afternoon the umpires completely re-wrote the holding the ball interpretation. Is this what we can expect for the rest of the year now?
The only excuse for that one is if the ump was on the wrong side and thought eddie kicked it in one action rather than dropping it then picking it up and kicking it. Was a howler wasn't it...even Murphys free after for too high could have been play on
by Lightning McQueen » Mon May 06, 2019 10:51 am
Booney wrote:Looking forward to the umpiring department coming out and telling us the Betts non-holding the ball call in the third quarter was the right decision this afternoon.
In 2 hours yesterday afternoon the umpires completely re-wrote the holding the ball interpretation. Is this what we can expect for the rest of the year now?
by Lightning McQueen » Mon May 06, 2019 10:51 am
Booney wrote:MW wrote:Booney wrote:Looking forward to the umpiring department coming out and telling us the Betts non-holding the ball call in the third quarter was the right decision this afternoon.
In 2 hours yesterday afternoon the umpires completely re-wrote the holding the ball interpretation. Is this what we can expect for the rest of the year now?
The only excuse for that one is if the ump was on the wrong side and thought eddie kicked it in one action rather than dropping it then picking it up and kicking it. Was a howler wasn't it...even Murphys free after for too high could have been play on
There was one with Walker, on the members side, last quarter, the umpire called it but no before Walker had brushed one aside, been tackled, spun round 360 and missed the kick, only then did the umpire call it.
by Booney » Mon May 06, 2019 10:52 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Booney wrote:MW wrote:Booney wrote:Looking forward to the umpiring department coming out and telling us the Betts non-holding the ball call in the third quarter was the right decision this afternoon.
In 2 hours yesterday afternoon the umpires completely re-wrote the holding the ball interpretation. Is this what we can expect for the rest of the year now?
The only excuse for that one is if the ump was on the wrong side and thought eddie kicked it in one action rather than dropping it then picking it up and kicking it. Was a howler wasn't it...even Murphys free after for too high could have been play on
There was one with Walker, on the members side, last quarter, the umpire called it but no before Walker had brushed one aside, been tackled, spun round 360 and missed the kick, only then did the umpire call it.
No, he didn't, I just wrote the same thing
by Brodlach » Mon May 06, 2019 10:53 am
Booney wrote:MW wrote:Booney wrote:Looking forward to the umpiring department coming out and telling us the Betts non-holding the ball call in the third quarter was the right decision this afternoon.
In 2 hours yesterday afternoon the umpires completely re-wrote the holding the ball interpretation. Is this what we can expect for the rest of the year now?
The only excuse for that one is if the ump was on the wrong side and thought eddie kicked it in one action rather than dropping it then picking it up and kicking it. Was a howler wasn't it...even Murphys free after for too high could have been play on
There was one with Walker, on the members side, last quarter, the umpire called it but no before Walker had brushed one aside, been tackled, spun round 360 and missed the kick, only then did the umpire call it.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by whufc » Mon May 06, 2019 11:30 am
DOC wrote:In the last five seasons, the premier has come from outside the top two in four of the five seasons. Only West Coast last year was able to convert it.
The last minor premier to become premier was Hawthorn in 2013.
Over a season, form, injuries, bad decisions, good decisions and some pure ass will all play a significant part.
by Booney » Mon May 06, 2019 11:39 am
Brodlach wrote:Booney wrote:MW wrote:Booney wrote:Looking forward to the umpiring department coming out and telling us the Betts non-holding the ball call in the third quarter was the right decision this afternoon.
In 2 hours yesterday afternoon the umpires completely re-wrote the holding the ball interpretation. Is this what we can expect for the rest of the year now?
The only excuse for that one is if the ump was on the wrong side and thought eddie kicked it in one action rather than dropping it then picking it up and kicking it. Was a howler wasn't it...even Murphys free after for too high could have been play on
There was one with Walker, on the members side, last quarter, the umpire called it but no before Walker had brushed one aside, been tackled, spun round 360 and missed the kick, only then did the umpire call it.
Ironically that decision was just on the replay, from the time Walker picked up the ball to the umpire blowing his whistle was 4 seconds ( I went back and timed it). That’s pretty reasonable
I thought it hit Betts foot too until I just saw another angle
by Brodlach » Mon May 06, 2019 11:41 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Booney » Mon May 06, 2019 11:42 am
Brodlach wrote:Even glances his foot it’s considered a kick
by Spangas » Mon May 06, 2019 11:44 am
Booney wrote:Brodlach wrote:Booney wrote:
I thought it hit Betts foot too until I just saw another angle
Even if it did hit his foot it could hardly be construed as a kick and should have been HTB.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |