sturt1 wrote:take the glasses off and it reminds me abit of dj

by Wedgie » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:33 pm
sturt1 wrote:take the glasses off and it reminds me abit of dj
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by purch » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:37 pm
BPBRB wrote: As for the inexperienced Sturt side that many Sturt people are claiming ran out - to a degree that is right but you also had guys like Feast, Sheedy, Whiteman, Thredgold, Chambers who have played alot of football - check the budget.
by BPBRB » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:38 pm
by BPBRB » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:40 pm
purch wrote:BPBRB wrote: As for the inexperienced Sturt side that many Sturt people are claiming ran out - to a degree that is right but you also had guys like Feast, Sheedy, Whiteman, Thredgold, Chambers who have played alot of football - check the budget.
Thredgold? Oh Dear, who really needs a budget?
by sturt1 » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:43 pm
BPBRB wrote:Sturt1 - you got in front by the margin you did because you played very good football and North were unaccountable to a degree that assisted. I'm sure if you had a full deck to pick from (or near enough not counting AFL players as both teams had 2 taken) then you probably would not have got beaten if you held a 50 point lead however North went in without a number of first choice players too in our Captain Wintle, Vice Capt Brett White, Kaesler, Kingsley Walker and Weatherley also on the injuured list so it's all about equal in that regard.
In the end North stepped up finally and put some pressure on, made some moves and manned up and we over run you. As for the inexperienced Sturt side that many Sturt people are claiming ran out - to a degree that is right but you also had guys like Feast, Sheedy, Whiteman, Thredgold, Chambers who have played alot of football - check the budget as per games played and see who had the most experienced group of Senior players plus those who have been premiership players? North also had blokes like Cubillo, Gallman, Wright and Wundke - none of who have played more than 12 games so there was inexperience from our side too. Injuries didn't help you with Feast and Sheedy during the game but we lost Ryswyk and Motlop as well so we ended up with only 19 fit plus a badly limping Jimmy Allan.
The fact is we had a win from nowhere which suprised all of us North people after the first half showing. As I said on another thread it may be cold comfort but Sturt are a very good side and if they get a few in's this week and play the type of footy they played in the first half then there is no reason they can't beat the bays but it will be hard becasue the Bays would be the form team of the comp over the second half of the year.
by sturt1 » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:45 pm
Wedgie wrote:sturt1 wrote:take the glasses off and it reminds me abit of dj
by sturt1 » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:46 pm
hondo71 wrote:sturt1 wrote:No excuses at all. I still cant actually work out how we got 50 pts infront. All you northies keep bringing up Sturt were infront by "50 pts 5 minutes into the 3rd" but cant actually tell us why/how this happened?
I have read a several posts by 'Northies' criticising the lack of accountability in the first 1/2 half as well as coaching mistakes and match-up issues.
Go back and have a read .....
by purch » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:48 pm
BPBRB wrote:purch wrote:BPBRB wrote: As for the inexperienced Sturt side that many Sturt people are claiming ran out - to a degree that is right but you also had guys like Feast, Sheedy, Whiteman, Thredgold, Chambers who have played alot of football - check the budget.
Thredgold? Oh Dear, who really needs a budget?
WhoopsCan't for the life of me work out why I put his name in? But he did play alot of Football though the fact is I'm out by 5 years!
by zipzap » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:51 pm
Wedgie wrote:Can someone please remind me next time we play Sturt not to take any photos of Sturt players since their supporters are more worried about the topic of the title as opposed to the actual photos I take for them (at both North games and games not even including North such as Port v Sturt earlier this year)
Bugger it, I'll start next week, there will be plenty of Bays highlights.
by zipzap » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:56 pm
therisingblues wrote: We were too good for them for over a half of footy, so I can't see how injuries step into it, unless a key player suddenly got injured just before North made their comeback. We have to wear this one.
by BPBRB » Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:00 am
by smithy » Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:02 am
by BPBRB » Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:08 am
smithy wrote:I google imaged " a dead rooster" at half time ready to post it on here.
Needless to say the link has since been deleted.
by sturtpeter » Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:27 pm
by am Bays » Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:29 pm
sturtpeter wrote:Who is the good looking dude wearing the legendary No. 40 guernesy?![]()
![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |