gadj1976 wrote:I didn't see it. I've seen the snippet on replay but did he 'intentionally shake' the post? I think that's the sticking point.
He intentionally climbed the post so unless the post is made if concrete, naturally shaking would ensue
by LMA » Sat May 11, 2019 12:08 pm
gadj1976 wrote:I didn't see it. I've seen the snippet on replay but did he 'intentionally shake' the post? I think that's the sticking point.
by woodublieve12 » Sat May 11, 2019 12:21 pm
Spargo wrote:I hope the media make a huge issue out of this & go on about it all week.
It is simply not good enough.
At the end of the day, the umpire deliberately chose not to pay a blatantly obvious free kick which he witnessed, instead choosing to “warn” the player twice. It is irrelevant that maybe Sydney were the better team on the night, countless teams lose during the season when they’ve outplayed their opponents. The fact of it is, this umpire mistake cost Essendon the match.
by Jase » Sat May 11, 2019 12:26 pm
Everything in it, get everyone back to the SCG this morning and let Essendon take the kick from the goal line...amber_fluid wrote:Nothing in it, play on.
I might have tipped the swans!
by mots02 » Sat May 11, 2019 12:27 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Spargo wrote:I hope the media make a huge issue out of this & go on about it all week.
It is simply not good enough.
At the end of the day, the umpire deliberately chose not to pay a blatantly obvious free kick which he witnessed, instead choosing to “warn” the player twice. It is irrelevant that maybe Sydney were the better team on the night, countless teams lose during the season when they’ve outplayed their opponents. The fact of it is, this umpire mistake cost Essendon the match.
And if lost by a kick could we blame the one I mentioned above?
by Jim05 » Sat May 11, 2019 12:30 pm
by woodublieve12 » Sat May 11, 2019 12:33 pm
mots02 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Spargo wrote:I hope the media make a huge issue out of this & go on about it all week.
It is simply not good enough.
At the end of the day, the umpire deliberately chose not to pay a blatantly obvious free kick which he witnessed, instead choosing to “warn” the player twice. It is irrelevant that maybe Sydney were the better team on the night, countless teams lose during the season when they’ve outplayed their opponents. The fact of it is, this umpire mistake cost Essendon the match.
And if lost by a kick could we blame the one I mentioned above?
So you’re condoning cheating or attempted cheating if it’s over looked by the officials?
Fit in well down at Prospect Oval.... already got your colours sorted!
by woodublieve12 » Sat May 11, 2019 12:35 pm
by mots02 » Sat May 11, 2019 12:37 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:mots02 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Spargo wrote:I hope the media make a huge issue out of this & go on about it all week.
It is simply not good enough.
At the end of the day, the umpire deliberately chose not to pay a blatantly obvious free kick which he witnessed, instead choosing to “warn” the player twice. It is irrelevant that maybe Sydney were the better team on the night, countless teams lose during the season when they’ve outplayed their opponents. The fact of it is, this umpire mistake cost Essendon the match.
And if lost by a kick could we blame the one I mentioned above?
So you’re condoning cheating or attempted cheating if it’s over looked by the officials?
Fit in well down at Prospect Oval.... already got your colours sorted!
Firstly the swans didn’t cheat. And in no way have I condoned it.
It wasn’t called. In no way is that the swans fault.
And north can get ****
by Jim05 » Sat May 11, 2019 12:37 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:If any other club did this I doubt very much we’d still be talking about it today very much
by Spargo » Sat May 11, 2019 12:38 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:If any other club did this I doubt very much we’d still be talking about it today very much
by woodublieve12 » Sat May 11, 2019 12:38 pm
Jim05 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:If any other club did this I doubt very much we’d still be talking about it today very much
No, because if we did the Swans would have 100% got the free
by woodublieve12 » Sat May 11, 2019 12:40 pm
by amber_fluid » Sat May 11, 2019 12:41 pm
Jim05 wrote:You are all assuming that dud Myers would kick the goal from the goal square [emoji3]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by Jim05 » Sat May 11, 2019 12:41 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Jim05 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:If any other club did this I doubt very much we’d still be talking about it today very much
No, because if we did the Swans would have 100% got the free
I think we both know that’s not true
by amber_fluid » Sat May 11, 2019 12:42 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Of course I have deflected it. Their wouldn’t be a person in this group who wouldn’t. It was a very stupid thing to do
by woodublieve12 » Sat May 11, 2019 12:48 pm
by LMA » Sat May 11, 2019 1:03 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:If any other club did this I doubt very much we’d still be talking about it today very much
by mots02 » Sat May 11, 2019 1:17 pm
LMA wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:If any other club did this I doubt very much we’d still be talking about it today very much
Any other club it would of blew up last night but wuth Sydney playing most were asleep by qtr time
by woodublieve12 » Sat May 11, 2019 1:44 pm
by saintal » Sat May 11, 2019 1:53 pm
Jim05 wrote:And so predictable from AFL. Could have got $1.01 on that being the response
https://twitter.com/tommorris32/status/ ... 32832?s=21
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |