by woodublieve12 » Tue May 21, 2019 8:29 pm
by amber_fluid » Tue May 21, 2019 8:33 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:amber_fluid wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Daisy getting fined $7500 for calling the umpire a cheat is a joke.
He should have shook the goal post instead!
Rampe got 10k for sounding like a girl. Thomas got off lightly
Rampe was being sexist, Daisy was just telling the truth.
Rampe got nothing for shaking the post, I think he’s the one who got off lightly.
He got fined for shaking the post after Gil gave it the all clear.
How is he telling the truth? Calling someone a cheat is a very big accusation
by Spargo » Tue May 21, 2019 8:36 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Spargo wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:This Reid non decision could’ve cost us the game.
Clutching at straws spargo. These get missed all the time
Not clutching at straws at all, merely stating facts.
You’re the one who put up the misleading post.
The facts are, 2 weeks straight the umpires have missed blatant frees that have resulted in Sydney winning.
Even through you’re rose (and white) coloured glasses you can see that.
So it is fact Goldstein would have kicked it?
by woodublieve12 » Tue May 21, 2019 9:03 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue May 21, 2019 9:28 pm
Spargo wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Spargo wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:This Reid non decision could’ve cost us the game.
Clutching at straws spargo. These get missed all the time
Not clutching at straws at all, merely stating facts.
You’re the one who put up the misleading post.
The facts are, 2 weeks straight the umpires have missed blatant frees that have resulted in Sydney winning.
Even through you’re rose (and white) coloured glasses you can see that.
So it is fact Goldstein would have kicked it?
It would’ve been nice if he’d had the chance.
If the shoe was on the other foot & Sydney had been dudded by incompetent umpiring 2 weeks straight, you’d be squealing like a pig.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Tue May 21, 2019 10:15 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Daisy getting fined $7500 for calling the umpire a cheat is a joke.
He should have shook the goal post instead!
by PatowalongaPirate » Tue May 21, 2019 10:24 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Of course I’d be pissed. But I’d be more annoyed my side conceded 7 goals in a qtr.
by woodublieve12 » Tue May 21, 2019 11:13 pm
PatowalongaPirate wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Of course I’d be pissed. But I’d be more annoyed my side conceded 7 goals in a qtr.
No you wouldn't.
by amber_fluid » Wed May 22, 2019 8:26 am
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Daisy getting fined $7500 for calling the umpire a cheat is a joke.
He should have shook the goal post instead!
So, do you think it's acceptable for players to tell an umpire he is a 'f***ing cheat"?
by whufc » Wed May 22, 2019 9:32 am
amber_fluid wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Daisy getting fined $7500 for calling the umpire a cheat is a joke.
He should have shook the goal post instead!
So, do you think it's acceptable for players to tell an umpire he is a 'f***ing cheat"?
Of course not.
But $7500 is ridiculous given Daisy thought the umpire was coaching and helping GWS.
It’s not the boundary umpires job to tell players where to stand.
$2000 fine would have been sufficient I think.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed May 22, 2019 9:41 am
Spargo wrote:It would’ve been nice if he’d had the chance.
If the shoe was on the other foot & Sydney had been dudded by incompetent umpiring 2 weeks straight, you’d be squealing like a pig.
by woodublieve12 » Wed May 22, 2019 10:10 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Spargo wrote:It would’ve been nice if he’d had the chance.
If the shoe was on the other foot & Sydney had been dudded by incompetent umpiring 2 weeks straight, you’d be squealing like a pig.
He is just as bad on Facebook, he is very slappable!
by Lightning McQueen » Wed May 22, 2019 10:12 am
woodublieve12 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Spargo wrote:It would’ve been nice if he’d had the chance.
If the shoe was on the other foot & Sydney had been dudded by incompetent umpiring 2 weeks straight, you’d be squealing like a pig.
He is just as bad on Facebook, he is very slappable!
by woodublieve12 » Wed May 22, 2019 10:55 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Spargo wrote:It would’ve been nice if he’d had the chance.
If the shoe was on the other foot & Sydney had been dudded by incompetent umpiring 2 weeks straight, you’d be squealing like a pig.
He is just as bad on Facebook, he is very slappable!
You love it, you only see red and white, you're not a lone soldier but bloody hell!!
by David Brent » Wed May 22, 2019 10:56 am
by Booney » Wed May 22, 2019 11:03 am
David Brent wrote:Thoughts on Ivan Soldo not being able to overturn his suspension? I thought it was reasonably simillar to the Cox one that was thrown out earlier in the year, alas I am wrong.
Worth a week or not?
by Jim05 » Wed May 22, 2019 11:04 am
David Brent wrote:Thoughts on Ivan Soldo not being able to overturn his suspension? I thought it was reasonably simillar to the Cox one that was thrown out earlier in the year, alas I am wrong.
Worth a week or not?
by Lightning McQueen » Wed May 22, 2019 11:07 am
woodublieve12 wrote:
Look, i know i am one eyed. But believe it or not i do use some common sense. In regard to my comment about the 7 goal qtr and that costing north the game, that was the coach in me speaking.
The goal post shaking was dumb and we were very lucky. But if the bombers did the same thing. Surprisingly i wouldn't even be bitching (maybe as a joke), i'd be frustrated but again the shot was from 65-70m out and if we cant win in the alotted time. Get off.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed May 22, 2019 11:13 am
David Brent wrote:Thoughts on Ivan Soldo not being able to overturn his suspension? I thought it was reasonably simillar to the Cox one that was thrown out earlier in the year, alas I am wrong.
Worth a week or not?
by woodublieve12 » Wed May 22, 2019 11:21 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:
Look, i know i am one eyed. But believe it or not i do use some common sense. In regard to my comment about the 7 goal qtr and that costing north the game, that was the coach in me speaking.
The goal post shaking was dumb and we were very lucky. But if the bombers did the same thing. Surprisingly i wouldn't even be bitching (maybe as a joke), i'd be frustrated but again the shot was from 65-70m out and if we cant win in the alotted time. Get off.
The 7 goal quarter has merit.
Yeah, half the time I'm not sure if you're taking the piss for a bite or actually believe what you're saying is true, it is funny seeing the fish that you do catch and it's like you fold your arms and lift your chin.
The Bomber thing should've been a 50, it wasn't paid, EOS, that is the first time I've actually seen you admit it being dumb and you guys being lucky, nice work.
I'm not a biter, I have a brother in law and several other Cow supporter fans that are 10 times worse than you that I just choose to ignore, the BIL happily states that he doesn't care if the Cows only win two games a year, it is laughable.
There's plenty of Port ones that leave me shaking my head too, I just don't buy into it, my team is middle of the table kind of thing and I accept their limitations unfortunately as that isn't going to change in the next couple of seasons.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |