ODI World Cup 2019

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby locky801 » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:28 pm

spell_check wrote:
MW wrote: say, leave that sort of shit (most boundaries tie-breaker) for T20 tournaments, where that is what people come for (to see a 6 and a 4 every third ball).


lucky to even see that in a T20 these days apart from the IPL ;)
You cant change your past but you can sure hell shape you future
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 55750
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 3645 times
Been liked: 1160 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:35 pm

Trader wrote:Overthrow - under the laws its 5, but has always been applied as 6. This is a case of the evolution of the game getting ahead of the bylaws. 100 years ago batsmen wouldn't take on the fielder like they do these days. I expect this rule to be updated slightly to take the modern cricket into account, just like they did with grounding your bat and running past the stumps. (TV slow mo shows both feet off the ground in a normal running position, but now you can't be given run out anymore after they updated the law).

Superover - great spectacle, nothing wrong with using it to finish the game. The boundaries hit 2ndary tie-breaker is a bit annoying. I'd prefer wickets lost to be used if they want a tie-breaker. Ultimately I'd like to see a tie after the superover to simply be a tie. The rules for CWC19 were if both days of the final were washed out, the cup would be shared, so why not share it after a double-tie.

Umpires - I thought they were fairly poor. 4 decisions overturned from memory, and would have been another had NZ still had a review available for Ross Taylor.

Santner - massively under-bowled in the final. Not sure why. Perhaps it was punishment for ducking the last ball and not even trying to run a bye. You can look back on a game like this and think what if this and that, but for mine, this (not trying to score on the last ball) was the moment that should be questioned the most.

Re: overthrows. Surely umpires are duty bound to umpire to the laws of cricket. There should not be room for any interpretation. It's black and white. If they hadn't crossed when Guptill released the throw, it's 5, Stokes not on strike and a massive blunder by the umpires. If they had crossed, then it's 6, Stokes on strike and the umpires got it right. I still haven't seen any conclusive footage that shows whether they had crossed or not when Guptill released the throw.
Senor Moto Gadili
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3611
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:52 pm
Has liked: 206 times
Been liked: 532 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby spell_check » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:46 pm

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
Trader wrote:Overthrow - under the laws its 5, but has always been applied as 6. This is a case of the evolution of the game getting ahead of the bylaws. 100 years ago batsmen wouldn't take on the fielder like they do these days. I expect this rule to be updated slightly to take the modern cricket into account, just like they did with grounding your bat and running past the stumps. (TV slow mo shows both feet off the ground in a normal running position, but now you can't be given run out anymore after they updated the law).

Superover - great spectacle, nothing wrong with using it to finish the game. The boundaries hit 2ndary tie-breaker is a bit annoying. I'd prefer wickets lost to be used if they want a tie-breaker. Ultimately I'd like to see a tie after the superover to simply be a tie. The rules for CWC19 were if both days of the final were washed out, the cup would be shared, so why not share it after a double-tie.

Umpires - I thought they were fairly poor. 4 decisions overturned from memory, and would have been another had NZ still had a review available for Ross Taylor.

Santner - massively under-bowled in the final. Not sure why. Perhaps it was punishment for ducking the last ball and not even trying to run a bye. You can look back on a game like this and think what if this and that, but for mine, this (not trying to score on the last ball) was the moment that should be questioned the most.

Re: overthrows. Surely umpires are duty bound to umpire to the laws of cricket. There should not be room for any interpretation. It's black and white. If they hadn't crossed when Guptill released the throw, it's 5, Stokes not on strike and a massive blunder by the umpires. If they had crossed, then it's 6, Stokes on strike and the umpires got it right. I still haven't seen any conclusive footage that shows whether they had crossed or not when Guptill released the throw.


You will now, pause at 0:45:
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18719
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 178 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby Trader » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:49 pm

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
Trader wrote:Overthrow - under the laws its 5, but has always been applied as 6. This is a case of the evolution of the game getting ahead of the bylaws. 100 years ago batsmen wouldn't take on the fielder like they do these days. I expect this rule to be updated slightly to take the modern cricket into account, just like they did with grounding your bat and running past the stumps. (TV slow mo shows both feet off the ground in a normal running position, but now you can't be given run out anymore after they updated the law).


Re: overthrows. Surely umpires are duty bound to umpire to the laws of cricket. There should not be room for any interpretation. It's black and white. If they hadn't crossed when Guptill released the throw, it's 5, Stokes not on strike and a massive blunder by the umpires. If they had crossed, then it's 6, Stokes on strike and the umpires got it right. I still haven't seen any conclusive footage that shows whether they had crossed or not when Guptill released the throw.


Correct, they are required to umpire to the laws of the game, they got it wrong (see comments from Taufel below). It happens.

This is the photo of when the throw is released. Stokes is only just leaving the bowlers end:
Image

Retired umpire Taufel, named ICC umpire of the year every year from 2004 to 2008, who stood in the 2011 World Cup final, and is a member of the MCC Laws subcommittee, defended officiating umpires Kumar Dharmasena and Marais Erasmus, who were in the middle for the chaotic finish, but confirmed they had erred.

"There was a judgment error on the overthrow," Taufel told The Age and Sydney Morning Herald.

"The judgment error was the timing of when the fielder threw the ball. The act of the overthrow starts when the fielder releases the ball. That's the act.

"It becomes an overthrow from the instant of the throw."

Taufel explained that the umpires had a raft of things to consider every ball.

"In this particular case, the umpires have got a lot on their plate, because like every ball, they've had to watch the batsmen complete the first run, they've had to watch the ball being fielded, to understand how it's in play, whether the fielder's done the right thing. Then they've got to look to see when the ball is released, in case there is an overthrow. And that happens every delivery of the game. And then they've got to back to see where the two batsmen are.

"They've then got to follow on and see what happens after that, whether there is a run out, whether there's an 'obstructing the field', whether the ball is taken fairly. There's multitudes of decisions to be taken off the one delivery. What's unfortunate is that people think that umpiring is just about outs and not outs. They forget we make 1000s of decisions every match.

"So it's unfortunate that there was a judgment error on the timing of the release of the ball and where the batsmen were. They did not cross on their second run, at the instant of the throw. So given that scenario, five runs should have been the correct allocation of runs, and Ben Stokes should have been at the non-striker's end for the next delivery.

"We're not perfect. You've got the best two umpires in the elite panel doing the final. They're doing their best like the other two teams are. This is just part of the game.

"I think it's unfair to say that the World Cup was decided by that one event. There's a lot of 'what ifs' and 'what should bes' and 'what could bes' that happen off those 600-plus deliveries. That's the nature of sport.”
Danny Southern telling Plugga he's fat, I'd like to see that!
User avatar
Trader
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4202
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 1:19 pm
Has liked: 60 times
Been liked: 794 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby FlyingHigh » Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:01 pm

I suppose this has been mentioned in media or forums somewhere but I haven't seen it - sure the Kiwis won the toss and batted, but the outfield would be quicker in the arvo than the morning, unlike a 20-20 game done in 3 hours.
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4832
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 81 times
Been liked: 173 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby daysofourlives » Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:07 pm

FlyingHigh wrote:I suppose this has been mentioned in media or forums somewhere but I haven't seen it - sure the Kiwis won the toss and batted, but the outfield would be quicker in the arvo than the morning, unlike a 20-20 game done in 3 hours.


If that was an issue in the Kiwis minds and knowing the rules before the game started you would think they would bat 2nd then ;)
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019
Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
daysofourlives
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11500
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:35 pm
Has liked: 2415 times
Been liked: 1657 times
Grassroots Team: Angaston

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Jul 15, 2019 8:09 pm

spell_check wrote:
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
Trader wrote:Overthrow - under the laws its 5, but has always been applied as 6. This is a case of the evolution of the game getting ahead of the bylaws. 100 years ago batsmen wouldn't take on the fielder like they do these days. I expect this rule to be updated slightly to take the modern cricket into account, just like they did with grounding your bat and running past the stumps. (TV slow mo shows both feet off the ground in a normal running position, but now you can't be given run out anymore after they updated the law).

Superover - great spectacle, nothing wrong with using it to finish the game. The boundaries hit 2ndary tie-breaker is a bit annoying. I'd prefer wickets lost to be used if they want a tie-breaker. Ultimately I'd like to see a tie after the superover to simply be a tie. The rules for CWC19 were if both days of the final were washed out, the cup would be shared, so why not share it after a double-tie.

Umpires - I thought they were fairly poor. 4 decisions overturned from memory, and would have been another had NZ still had a review available for Ross Taylor.

Santner - massively under-bowled in the final. Not sure why. Perhaps it was punishment for ducking the last ball and not even trying to run a bye. You can look back on a game like this and think what if this and that, but for mine, this (not trying to score on the last ball) was the moment that should be questioned the most.

Re: overthrows. Surely umpires are duty bound to umpire to the laws of cricket. There should not be room for any interpretation. It's black and white. If they hadn't crossed when Guptill released the throw, it's 5, Stokes not on strike and a massive blunder by the umpires. If they had crossed, then it's 6, Stokes on strike and the umpires got it right. I still haven't seen any conclusive footage that shows whether they had crossed or not when Guptill released the throw.


You will now, pause at 0:45:

Cheers .... that's pretty clear cut.
It's good that Simon Taufell has acknowledged they got it wrong. I accept the umpires have a lot on their plate, but they also have the use of technology, which they failed to use. Credit to Kane Williamson and the other black caps for the way they have accepted this loss. I can't imagine the reaction if India were in New Zealands' shoes.
Last edited by Senor Moto Gadili on Mon Jul 15, 2019 10:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Senor Moto Gadili
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3611
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:52 pm
Has liked: 206 times
Been liked: 532 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby LMA » Mon Jul 15, 2019 10:30 pm

If India was in NZ shoes it would already be in the courts
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby LMA » Mon Jul 15, 2019 10:51 pm

daysofourlives wrote:
mal wrote:Did they use new balls for the super over, or continue with the balls used in the 50 overs ?


It looked like each bowler chose a ball from their 2nd hand box


We should of given the Kiwis our 2nd hand box, there would be some coarse balls in there.
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby tigerpie » Mon Jul 15, 2019 10:59 pm

LMA wrote:If India was in NZ shoes it would already be in the courts

They'd be burning effigy's of the umpires in the street.
tigerpie
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4108
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Has liked: 498 times
Been liked: 429 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Jul 15, 2019 11:01 pm

LMA wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:
mal wrote:Did they use new balls for the super over, or continue with the balls used in the 50 overs ?


It looked like each bowler chose a ball from their 2nd hand box


We should of given the Kiwis our 2nd hand box, there would be some coarse balls in there.

.... but, they are red ones.
Senor Moto Gadili
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3611
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:52 pm
Has liked: 206 times
Been liked: 532 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 16, 2019 9:43 am

Regardless of the "letter of the law", if it hadn't have been in such a critical moment and didn't decide the winner, it would've been called 2 plus 4 overthrows any day of the week.

The umpires should be watching the wickets/crease line, this is an exceptional case but as much as it pains me to see the Poms win, I'm cool with what happened and the result, there were far more variables that could've prevented the Poms even having a chance.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51284
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4339 times
Been liked: 7902 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby PatowalongaPirate » Tue Jul 16, 2019 10:02 am

The rules on this aren't consistent with ODI cricket. If it was a T20 where the game is all about boundaries then fair enough, but NZ bowled out England whilst they themselves still had wickets in the shed. This should have been the deciding factor. The DL system takes into account wickets in hand when deciding an ODI - not boundaries scored.
safooty Melbourne Cup Day Tipping Champion 2018 & 2019 #Back2Back
2018 safooty NFL Tipping Champion
User avatar
PatowalongaPirate
2022 SA Footy Punter of the Year
 
 
Posts: 5312
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:31 am
Location: Tiger Land
Has liked: 444 times
Been liked: 1208 times
Grassroots Team: Sacred Heart OC

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby saintal » Tue Jul 16, 2019 10:16 am

What would have happened with both teams hit the same number of boundaries? What's the next tie-breaker?

Such a disappointing, illogical and unsatisfactory way to end a 7 week tournament.
SAFC- 60 years...
StKFC- 58 years..
User avatar
saintal
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5658
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills
Has liked: 346 times
Been liked: 428 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby FlyingHigh » Tue Jul 16, 2019 10:37 am

Lightning McQueen wrote:Regardless of the "letter of the law", if it hadn't have been in such a critical moment and didn't decide the winner, it would've been called 2 plus 4 overthrows any day of the week.

The umpires should be watching the wickets/crease line, this is an exceptional case but as much as it pains me to see the Poms win, I'm cool with what happened and the result, there were far more variables that could've prevented the Poms even having a chance.


The one incident/player that I think has escaped some criticism is Neesham. To play that shot at 4/170-odd when they were just getting on top again after having already taken a couple boundaries off the over was ordinary. If he batted for another five overs they would have made conservatively 260.
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4832
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 81 times
Been liked: 173 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby rd » Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:45 pm

PatowalongaPirate wrote:The rules on this aren't consistent with ODI cricket. If it was a T20 where the game is all about boundaries then fair enough, but NZ bowled out England whilst they themselves still had wickets in the shed. This should have been the deciding factor. The DL system takes into account wickets in hand when deciding an ODI - not boundaries scored.


I'm thinking for the World Cup Semi Finals and Grand Final - in case of a tied match it should be the higher ranked team which in last Sunday's match makes England the rightful winner.
Leave the Super Overs and Boundaries Count to decide winners with the T20 games.
User avatar
rd
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 715
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:07 pm
Location: Double Blue Heaven.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 26 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby Minimum Chips » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:22 pm

rd wrote:
PatowalongaPirate wrote:The rules on this aren't consistent with ODI cricket. If it was a T20 where the game is all about boundaries then fair enough, but NZ bowled out England whilst they themselves still had wickets in the shed. This should have been the deciding factor. The DL system takes into account wickets in hand when deciding an ODI - not boundaries scored.


I'm thinking for the World Cup Semi Finals and Grand Final - in case of a tied match it should be the higher ranked team which in last Sunday's match makes England the rightful winner.


Not unlike '99 when we won the semi and got through by the fact we had beaten SA earlier in the tournament. Same would apply here.
Minimum Chips
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 8:04 pm
Has liked: 31 times
Been liked: 51 times
Grassroots Team: Bute

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby batmanbegins » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:35 pm

Just wanted to say full credit to the way the Kiwi's have handled this, absolute testament to the team they are. They have been pretty well screwed here but this is a team that is incredibly likeable for many reasons. As mentioned can only imagine how India would have dealt with a similar hand.
batmanbegins
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 905
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:21 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 187 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:43 pm

batmanbegins wrote:Just wanted to say full credit to the way the Kiwi's have handled this, absolute testament to the team they are. They have been pretty well screwed here but this is a team that is incredibly likeable for many reasons. As mentioned can only imagine how India would have dealt with a similar hand.

You'd be tickled shitless hey mate?
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51284
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4339 times
Been liked: 7902 times

Re: ODI World Cup 2019

Postby RB » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:50 pm

Minimum Chips wrote:
rd wrote:
PatowalongaPirate wrote:The rules on this aren't consistent with ODI cricket. If it was a T20 where the game is all about boundaries then fair enough, but NZ bowled out England whilst they themselves still had wickets in the shed. This should have been the deciding factor. The DL system takes into account wickets in hand when deciding an ODI - not boundaries scored.


I'm thinking for the World Cup Semi Finals and Grand Final - in case of a tied match it should be the higher ranked team which in last Sunday's match makes England the rightful winner.


Not unlike '99 when we won the semi and got through by the fact we had beaten SA earlier in the tournament. Same would apply here.

I think it '99 we technically got through due to having finished higher after the Super Six round.

I agree though that the higher-ranked team should prevail in the event of a tie, à la the state one day final in 2012.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
RB
Coach
 
Posts: 5628
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:45 pm
Has liked: 759 times
Been liked: 1073 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |