by JK » Sun Sep 08, 2019 6:56 pm
by Senor Moto Gadili » Sun Sep 08, 2019 6:56 pm
by cennals05 » Sun Sep 08, 2019 6:56 pm
by daysofourlives » Sun Sep 08, 2019 6:59 pm
cennals05 wrote:McBean injury a worry for the Bays. Frampton and Johnson should miss through suspension but I think we all know the SANFL will be too gutless to actually suspend them.
by Jim05 » Sun Sep 08, 2019 7:00 pm
JK wrote:Jim05 wrote:It’s pretty clear the SANFL want the two AFL sides to win so its time to play dirty.
The SANFL clubs need to target the AFL players and continually belt them off the ball and resort to underhanded tactics if need be
Last I saw the Bays lead the frees 26-15, or did you mean player concessions?
by carey » Sun Sep 08, 2019 7:05 pm
Jim05 wrote:It’s pretty clear the SANFL want the two AFL sides to win so its time to play dirty.
The SANFL clubs need to target the AFL players and continually belt them off the ball and resort to underhanded tactics if need be
by Jim05 » Sun Sep 08, 2019 7:07 pm
carey wrote:Jim05 wrote:It’s pretty clear the SANFL want the two AFL sides to win so its time to play dirty.
The SANFL clubs need to target the AFL players and continually belt them off the ball and resort to underhanded tactics if need be
Bullshit. Check the free kick count in today’s game.
by Reddeer » Sun Sep 08, 2019 7:21 pm
Jim05 wrote:carey wrote:Jim05 wrote:It’s pretty clear the SANFL want the two AFL sides to win so its time to play dirty.
The SANFL clubs need to target the AFL players and continually belt them off the ball and resort to underhanded tactics if need be
Bullshit. Check the free kick count in today’s game.
I mean by the qualification rules. The SANFL absolutely want the AFL sides to be successful otherwise it would be capped at 12 AFL players max already.
by LMA » Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:06 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:08 pm
LMA wrote:Just last week on here both Port and Adelaide were accused of not trying and not wanting to win. FFS stick to one view, are they trying or are they too good.
Glenelg are still the best side by far, our Ammo boys stood up today though.
by LMA » Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:11 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:17 pm
LMA wrote:Easily more yellow and black supporters there today. But the Magpie cheer squad was way more uniformed
by Booney » Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:27 pm
LMA wrote:Easily more yellow and black supporters there today. But the Magpie cheer squad was way more uniformed
by LMA » Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:28 pm
Jim05 wrote:LMA wrote:Just last week on here both Port and Adelaide were accused of not trying and not wanting to win. FFS stick to one view, are they trying or are they too good.
Glenelg are still the best side by far, our Ammo boys stood up today though.
I’ve always maintained they are too good and wouldn’t care if they were forced to field a team that was beaten by 10 goals every week. They absolutely should not ever be allowed to win a flag
by LMA » Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:31 pm
Booney wrote:LMA wrote:Easily more yellow and black supporters there today. But the Magpie cheer squad was way more uniformed
Easily? Good spread I thought.
by Jim05 » Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:34 pm
LMA wrote:Jim05 wrote:LMA wrote:Just last week on here both Port and Adelaide were accused of not trying and not wanting to win. FFS stick to one view, are they trying or are they too good.
Glenelg are still the best side by far, our Ammo boys stood up today though.
I’ve always maintained they are too good and wouldn’t care if they were forced to field a team that was beaten by 10 goals every week. They absolutely should not ever be allowed to win a flag
If Port or Adelaide can win a flag than AFL listed players is the least of the SANFL problems. They need to cap the amount payments true amateur footballers are getting to keep quality players at SANFL level. SANFL clubs also need to stop paying reserve players and reward higher payments for the league players. This will ensure that Port or Adelaide will never win a flag, not capping the amount of SANFL standard AFL players playing SANFL.
by daysofourlives » Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:34 pm
LMA wrote:Jim05 wrote:LMA wrote:Just last week on here both Port and Adelaide were accused of not trying and not wanting to win. FFS stick to one view, are they trying or are they too good.
Glenelg are still the best side by far, our Ammo boys stood up today though.
I’ve always maintained they are too good and wouldn’t care if they were forced to field a team that was beaten by 10 goals every week. They absolutely should not ever be allowed to win a flag
If Port or Adelaide can win a flag than AFL listed players is the least of the SANFL problems. They need to cap the amount payments true amateur footballers are getting to keep quality players at SANFL level. SANFL clubs also need to stop paying reserve players and reward higher payments for the league players. This will ensure that Port or Adelaide will never win a flag, not capping the amount of SANFL standard AFL players playing SANFL.
by LMA » Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:34 pm
Wedgie wrote:LMA wrote:Easily more yellow and black supporters there today. But the Magpie cheer squad was way more uniformed
You misspelt uninformed.
by LMA » Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:39 pm
Jim05 wrote:LMA wrote:Jim05 wrote:LMA wrote:Just last week on here both Port and Adelaide were accused of not trying and not wanting to win. FFS stick to one view, are they trying or are they too good.
Glenelg are still the best side by far, our Ammo boys stood up today though.
I’ve always maintained they are too good and wouldn’t care if they were forced to field a team that was beaten by 10 goals every week. They absolutely should not ever be allowed to win a flag
If Port or Adelaide can win a flag than AFL listed players is the least of the SANFL problems. They need to cap the amount payments true amateur footballers are getting to keep quality players at SANFL level. SANFL clubs also need to stop paying reserve players and reward higher payments for the league players. This will ensure that Port or Adelaide will never win a flag, not capping the amount of SANFL standard AFL players playing SANFL.
The SANFL clubs have a tight salary cap so can’t pay much more. Capping the AFL listed players is the easiest way. You take out 5 of your listed players today and replace them with kids or country league jobbers and the result is different. It still wouldn’t have helped us mind you
by Jim05 » Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:48 pm
LMA wrote:Jim05 wrote:LMA wrote:Jim05 wrote:[quote="LMA"]Just last week on here both Port and Adelaide were accused of not trying and not wanting to win. FFS stick to one view, are they trying or are they too good.
Glenelg are still the best side by far, our Ammo boys stood up today though.
I’ve always maintained they are too good and wouldn’t care if they were forced to field a team that was beaten by 10 goals every week. They absolutely should not ever be allowed to win a flag
If Port or Adelaide can win a flag than AFL listed players is the least of the SANFL problems. They need to cap the amount payments true amateur footballers are getting to keep quality players at SANFL level. SANFL clubs also need to stop paying reserve players and reward higher payments for the league players. This will ensure that Port or Adelaide will never win a flag, not capping the amount of SANFL standard AFL players playing SANFL.
The SANFL clubs have a tight salary cap so can’t pay much more. Capping the AFL listed players is the easiest way. You take out 5 of your listed players today and replace them with kids or country league jobbers and the result is different. It still wouldn’t have helped us mind you
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |