by Brodlach » Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:35 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by amber_fluid » Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:46 pm
Brodlach wrote:Thee Ed y need to get more entertainment events other than football and cricket. The stadium is under utilised
by LMA » Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:27 pm
Brodlach wrote:They need to get more entertainment events other than football and cricket. The stadium is under utilised
by Booney » Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:23 am
Bum Crack wrote:What's with all the hate? He actually has some valid points I thought.
by Bum Crack » Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:35 am
Booney wrote:Bum Crack wrote:What's with all the hate? He actually has some valid points I thought.
He does. Over the years he's made comments that I've not forgotten and people of that ilk I don't waste my time with.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:52 am
amber_fluid wrote:I did see AO have raised food and drink prices again.
They said they had no choice due to dwindling crowd numbers.
It was in the advertiser on the weekend if anyone wants to reference it.
Good way to try and get crowd numbers back eh?
Ridiculous.
by amber_fluid » Tue Nov 12, 2019 1:47 pm
by UK Fan » Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:22 pm
LMA wrote:Brodlach wrote:They need to get more entertainment events other than football and cricket. The stadium is under utilised
Always going to struggle to attract entertainment when your exposed to the elements. The size of the stadium also makes poor viewing for sports like soccer and rugby. A regular friday night SANFL fixture perhaps?
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Spargo » Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:36 pm
UK Fan wrote:Double headers on a saturday for SANFL would be handy and great for the comp.
by UK Fan » Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:38 pm
Booney wrote:Bum Crack wrote:What's with all the hate? He actually has some valid points I thought.
He does. Over the years he's made comments that I've not forgotten and people of that ilk I don't waste my time with.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by LMA » Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:37 pm
UK Fan wrote:Booney wrote:Bum Crack wrote:What's with all the hate? He actually has some valid points I thought.
He does. Over the years he's made comments that I've not forgotten and people of that ilk I don't waste my time with.
Sorry for raiising valid points/questions on PAFCs viability/reducing crowd numbers.
Answering the questions as oppose to character assassination might help Mr Perfect.
by locky801 » Wed Nov 13, 2019 3:23 am
by LMA » Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:29 am
locky801 wrote:Port Adelaide has delisted Boyd Woodcock and Riley Grundy. Both had a year to run on their two-year draftee contracts. However, Port has committed to reselecting them in the rookie draft
@AFLcomau
so why delist them
by Booney » Wed Nov 13, 2019 8:00 am
locky801 wrote:Port Adelaide has delisted Boyd Woodcock and Riley Grundy. Both had a year to run on their two-year draftee contracts. However, Port has committed to reselecting them in the rookie draft
@AFLcomau
so why delist them
by amber_fluid » Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:30 am
by Brodlach » Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:41 am
amber_fluid wrote:Does the club need to pay out the current contract even if they re-commit and select them again?
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by MW » Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:58 am
amber_fluid wrote:Does the club need to pay out the current contract even if they re-commit and select them again?
by Booney » Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:05 am
by Dutchy » Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:20 am
by UK Fan » Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:36 am
LMA wrote:UK Fan wrote:Booney wrote:Bum Crack wrote:What's with all the hate? He actually has some valid points I thought.
He does. Over the years he's made comments that I've not forgotten and people of that ilk I don't waste my time with.
Sorry for raiising valid points/questions on PAFCs viability/reducing crowd numbers.
Answering the questions as oppose to character assassination might help Mr Perfect.
So you think 44k is the norm for port crowds.
34k is disappointing, 38k is more like where we should be at, taking into account membership numbers. If we play good footy this will be achievable.
Supporters vote with their feet, thats the nature of sport. Is that so hard for you to comprehend?
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |