Booney wrote:Davies this morning said Port are asking for up to 70 staff to go. Players, reserves, coaches, support staff, media etc.
Wonder if they can all take their families?
70 seems very excessive
by Dutchy » Fri May 15, 2020 3:58 pm
Booney wrote:Davies this morning said Port are asking for up to 70 staff to go. Players, reserves, coaches, support staff, media etc.
Wonder if they can all take their families?
by Corona Man » Fri May 15, 2020 3:59 pm
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Davies this morning said Port are asking for up to 70 staff to go. Players, reserves, coaches, support staff, media etc.
Wonder if they can all take their families?
70 seems very excessive
by Booney » Fri May 15, 2020 5:07 pm
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Davies this morning said Port are asking for up to 70 staff to go. Players, reserves, coaches, support staff, media etc.
Wonder if they can all take their families?
70 seems very excessive
by Dutchy » Fri May 15, 2020 5:24 pm
by The Bedge » Fri May 15, 2020 5:27 pm
Dutchy wrote:I thought the Hub idea was 32 only? The rest can fly in if required.
Even if they have 40 up there 30 hanger on's is excessive, especially if you can share resources across all 4 teams up there (physio's, doctors, phych's, welfare etc)
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Brodlach » Fri May 15, 2020 6:16 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Booney » Fri May 15, 2020 6:39 pm
Dutchy wrote:I thought the Hub idea was 32 only? The rest can fly in if required.
Even if they have 40 up there 30 hanger on's is excessive, especially if you can share resources across all 4 teams up there (physio's, doctors, phych's, welfare etc)
by Sharksta » Fri May 15, 2020 9:35 pm
by Jim05 » Fri May 15, 2020 9:39 pm
Sharksta wrote:I love my footy but the inequity of the Victorian teams staying home with familiarity of facilities and venues makes this more corrupt than usual.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri May 15, 2020 9:45 pm
why not wait until we are free to travel country then??Jim05 wrote:Sharksta wrote:I love my footy but the inequity of the Victorian teams staying home with familiarity of facilities and venues makes this more corrupt than usual.
Is it the Victorian teams fault that the SA and WA governments have the strictest border laws in the country?
Without the state governments giving an exemption this was always going to happen
by Jim05 » Fri May 15, 2020 11:02 pm
There is still some chance that our borders won’t open for several months. The AFL and the clubs know that they absolutely must get some sort of season underway or there is a very real risk of financial ruin.mighty_tiger_79 wrote:why not wait until we are free to travel country then??Jim05 wrote:Sharksta wrote:I love my footy but the inequity of the Victorian teams staying home with familiarity of facilities and venues makes this more corrupt than usual.
Is it the Victorian teams fault that the SA and WA governments have the strictest border laws in the country?
Without the state governments giving an exemption this was always going to happen
Victoria, are still getting fresh new cases daily...yet their government proudly tell the country that restrictions are lifting....[emoji848][emoji848][emoji848]
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
by Trader » Fri May 15, 2020 11:57 pm
Sharksta wrote:I love my footy but the inequity of the Victorian teams staying home with familiarity of facilities and venues makes this more corrupt than usual.
by Dutchy » Sat May 16, 2020 1:11 pm
Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:I thought the Hub idea was 32 only? The rest can fly in if required.
Even if they have 40 up there 30 hanger on's is excessive, especially if you can share resources across all 4 teams up there (physio's, doctors, phych's, welfare etc)
So 10 up there play 10 v 10 scratchies and the 12 left here train in two groups of 6?
Can't see why not. All seems fair.
by Jim05 » Sat May 16, 2020 1:15 pm
Families can go but once there they must stay for the duration. No FIFO which would mean partners have to organise leave from work and children of school age would need to take a leave of absence.Booney wrote:Davies this morning said Port are asking for up to 70 staff to go. Players, reserves, coaches, support staff, media etc.
Wonder if they can all take their families?
by mots02 » Sat May 16, 2020 1:20 pm
stampy wrote:PLEASE EXPLAIN?..... not long ago the aflpa put the kybosh on clubs relocating interstate for a few months, not happening they declared.....................................NOW THE SA AND WA CLUBS ARE SET TO DO THAT EXACT THING!!!
by Dutchy » Sat May 16, 2020 1:26 pm
mots02 wrote:stampy wrote:PLEASE EXPLAIN?..... not long ago the aflpa put the kybosh on clubs relocating interstate for a few months, not happening they declared.....................................NOW THE SA AND WA CLUBS ARE SET TO DO THAT EXACT THING!!!
Patrick has certainly gone quiet on the issue now.
by mots02 » Sat May 16, 2020 1:33 pm
Dutchy wrote:mots02 wrote:stampy wrote:PLEASE EXPLAIN?..... not long ago the aflpa put the kybosh on clubs relocating interstate for a few months, not happening they declared.....................................NOW THE SA AND WA CLUBS ARE SET TO DO THAT EXACT THING!!!
Patrick has certainly gone quiet on the issue now.
Cause it doesn't impact him anymore
I thought the idea of the Gold Coast hub was Vic teams would come up to play them, if thats not the case then the SA/WA teams have been screwed over
by mots02 » Sat May 16, 2020 1:36 pm
Jim05 wrote:Sharksta wrote:I love my footy but the inequity of the Victorian teams staying home with familiarity of facilities and venues makes this more corrupt than usual.
Is it the Victorian teams fault that the SA and WA governments have the strictest border laws in the country?
Without the state governments giving an exemption this was always going to happen
by Jim05 » Sat May 16, 2020 1:56 pm
Nope. I said it the time that clubs should be allowed to train as per their state rulesmots02 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Sharksta wrote:I love my footy but the inequity of the Victorian teams staying home with familiarity of facilities and venues makes this more corrupt than usual.
Is it the Victorian teams fault that the SA and WA governments have the strictest border laws in the country?
Without the state governments giving an exemption this was always going to happen
Was it the SA and WA teams fault that the Victorian Gov wouldn't let people train in groups of 10 last week?
by Jim05 » Sun May 17, 2020 12:34 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |