whufc wrote:Does this make you somewhat sceptical about the validity of the test results we have seen throughout Australia.
I presume the average punter wouldn’t have got three days of testing in a row.
Interesting that this is one of the first high profile positives in the country and the test results are all over the shop.
Nope because no test is perfect
As Booney reported it appears McKenna has been floating around the edge of negative/irregularities/positive for the past week..
The "positive" test reportedly indicated the case was only mild.
Given the low level of severity it is plausible given his natural fitness levels that he was positive on Saturday and now three days later he has no biochemical markers to say he has COVID-19.
What I'm 100% certain of is based on WHO figures, there are over 4 million cases world wide and over 400 000 deaths. Yep those figures arent 100% accurate fdue to measurement and testing error but try telling that to over 400 000 families.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!