Southern Football League

A forum dedicated to the Southern Football League!

Re: Southern Football League

Postby Look Good In Leather » Mon Sep 13, 2021 6:28 pm

tigerpie wrote:
The Bedge wrote:
tigerpie wrote:Wtf? Who cares if she flushed her?
She could've broken her face really badly.
Bloody ordinary.

Well it makes all the difference - particularly in regards to a tribunal.

It's a horrible look and act, agreed, and could've ended very badly.. I was just asking if she got her.. probably looks worse than it was - may also explain why it was only a yellow instead of what thought was an obvious red.

Another classic example of the act being punished not the outcome.
Would've thought that's a red card all day.
It should always be the act that is punished, outcome should not come into it. Unfortunately we are starting to see an expectation that there should be a penalty everytime someone gets hurt irrespective of the act itself.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
User avatar
Look Good In Leather
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2070
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:50 am
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 284 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: Southern Football League

Postby mots02 » Mon Sep 13, 2021 6:56 pm

Look Good In Leather wrote:
tigerpie wrote:
The Bedge wrote:
tigerpie wrote:Wtf? Who cares if she flushed her?
She could've broken her face really badly.
Bloody ordinary.

Well it makes all the difference - particularly in regards to a tribunal.

It's a horrible look and act, agreed, and could've ended very badly.. I was just asking if she got her.. probably looks worse than it was - may also explain why it was only a yellow instead of what thought was an obvious red.

Another classic example of the act being punished not the outcome.
Would've thought that's a red card all day.
It should always be the act that is punished, outcome should not come into it. Unfortunately we are starting to see an expectation that there should be a penalty everytime someone gets hurt irrespective of the act itself.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk


Agreed, and that the way it used to be.

This particular act is precisely the reason why you should penalise the act and not the outcome. Reckless, Intentional, unprovoked and had the capacity to cause significant injury. Just luck or lack of skill that it didn't. Intent was clear, just lucky she executed poorly.

Watching this as a father i can see for the first time how the game has been looked at by mums not wanting their boys to play. I don't want my daughters out on the field with this sort of stuff going on.

Has to be a huge penalty. No excuse.
User avatar
mots02
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2602
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:42 pm
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 854 times
Grassroots Team: Reynella

Re: Southern Football League

Postby Barkeroo » Mon Sep 13, 2021 10:21 pm

Wow that's bad!
Barkeroo
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 3:58 pm
Has liked: 72 times
Been liked: 26 times
Grassroots Team: Mt Barker

Re: Southern Football League

Postby MatteeG » Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:50 am

mots02 wrote:
Agreed, and that the way it used to be.

This particular act is precisely the reason why you should penalise the act and not the outcome. Reckless, Intentional, unprovoked and had the capacity to cause significant injury. Just luck or lack of skill that it didn't. Intent was clear, just lucky she executed poorly.

Watching this as a father i can see for the first time how the game has been looked at by mums not wanting their boys to play. I don't want my daughters out on the field with this sort of stuff going on.

Has to be a huge penalty. No excuse.


Agree. Very ordinary act.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
User avatar
MatteeG
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4925
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:36 pm
Has liked: 524 times
Been liked: 511 times
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Southern Football League

Postby whufc » Tue Sep 14, 2021 11:58 am

MatteeG wrote:
mots02 wrote:
Agreed, and that the way it used to be.

This particular act is precisely the reason why you should penalise the act and not the outcome. Reckless, Intentional, unprovoked and had the capacity to cause significant injury. Just luck or lack of skill that it didn't. Intent was clear, just lucky she executed poorly.

Watching this as a father i can see for the first time how the game has been looked at by mums not wanting their boys to play. I don't want my daughters out on the field with this sort of stuff going on.

Has to be a huge penalty. No excuse.


Agree. Very ordinary act.


Yep 100% agree.

No place on a footy field for someone with that short a fuse. The 'tackle / contest' wasn't even little shove worthy never mind a full blooded knee to the head attempt worth.

If your anger is that easily lit a footy field isn't the place for you, go down to your local mixed martial arts trainer and get the anger sorted out.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 27453
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5565 times
Been liked: 2519 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Southern Football League

Postby tigerpie » Tue Sep 14, 2021 1:18 pm

Look Good In Leather wrote:
tigerpie wrote:
The Bedge wrote:
tigerpie wrote:Wtf? Who cares if she flushed her?
She could've broken her face really badly.
Bloody ordinary.

Well it makes all the difference - particularly in regards to a tribunal.

It's a horrible look and act, agreed, and could've ended very badly.. I was just asking if she got her.. probably looks worse than it was - may also explain why it was only a yellow instead of what thought was an obvious red.

Another classic example of the act being punished not the outcome.
Would've thought that's a red card all day.
It should always be the act that is punished, outcome should not come into it. Unfortunately we are starting to see an expectation that there should be a penalty everytime someone gets hurt irrespective of the act itself.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

I think the outcome should be considered but you are right the act should be punished.
tigerpie
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4110
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Has liked: 498 times
Been liked: 429 times

Re: Southern Football League

Postby Look Good In Leather » Tue Sep 14, 2021 6:17 pm

tigerpie wrote:
Look Good In Leather wrote:
tigerpie wrote:
The Bedge wrote:Well it makes all the difference - particularly in regards to a tribunal.

It's a horrible look and act, agreed, and could've ended very badly.. I was just asking if she got her.. probably looks worse than it was - may also explain why it was only a yellow instead of what thought was an obvious red.

Another classic example of the act being punished not the outcome.
Would've thought that's a red card all day.
It should always be the act that is punished, outcome should not come into it. Unfortunately we are starting to see an expectation that there should be a penalty everytime someone gets hurt irrespective of the act itself.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

I think the outcome should be considered but you are right the act should be punished.


Outcome should only be considered as evidence when determining severity, it should not be the driving factor.

i.e. Throwing a haymaker but not doing damage due to the reaction time of the target turning their head is still a more severe act than a broken nose resulting from a high fend-off during play.
User avatar
Look Good In Leather
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2070
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:50 am
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 284 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: Southern Football League

Postby Broken Down Hack » Sat Sep 18, 2021 5:37 pm

So Bushpigs win six in a row, time for a new challenge
Broken Down Hack
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 6:26 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Southern Football League

Postby Anatidae » Sat Sep 18, 2021 7:34 pm

Watched the GF today. 1st time I have watched SFL in a while. Played SFL in late 90’s-late 2000’s. Flaggies are a good side, but can’t be much depth in Comp based on today & what I read on here. I’ve watched a fair bit of Div 3 this year & Flaggies would go well, but not dominate in IMO. Not sure what answer is, but the competition has deteriorated.

On the bright side, outstanding U15 GF (with all SANFL lads available at this age group), these teams would be v. good SANFL Juniors Div 1 sides.
User avatar
Anatidae
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:23 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Southern Football League

Postby KegLeg » Sun Sep 19, 2021 1:33 pm

Anatidae wrote:Watched the GF today. 1st time I have watched SFL in a while. Played SFL in late 90’s-late 2000’s. Flaggies are a good side, but can’t be much depth in Comp based on today & what I read on here. I’ve watched a fair bit of Div 3 this year & Flaggies would go well, but not dominate in IMO. Not sure what answer is, but the competition has deteriorated.

On the bright side, outstanding U15 GF (with all SANFL lads available at this age group), these teams would be v. good SANFL Juniors Div 1 sides.


Well done flaggies on their 6th. A pretty remarkable achievement. I respectfully disagree and think while there are some struggles overall, I think Flaggy would be at least a good Div 2 side based on what I’ve seen, maybe even div 1 quality. It does drop away but the people that blame Flaggy for that are a bit warped in my opinion, they’ve set a great benchmark for everyone to try and beat. Perhaps all the other clubs need to look at themselves rather than whine at the quality of Flaggy.

The 15s was an amazing game of football. Well done to the wineflies, Reynella winning all 3 junior grades shows the club has a huge future ahead.
KegLeg
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 9:15 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: Elliston

Re: Southern Football League

Postby tigerpie » Sun Sep 19, 2021 7:16 pm

KegLeg wrote:
Anatidae wrote:Watched the GF today. 1st time I have watched SFL in a while. Played SFL in late 90’s-late 2000’s. Flaggies are a good side, but can’t be much depth in Comp based on today & what I read on here. I’ve watched a fair bit of Div 3 this year & Flaggies would go well, but not dominate in IMO. Not sure what answer is, but the competition has deteriorated.

On the bright side, outstanding U15 GF (with all SANFL lads available at this age group), these teams would be v. good SANFL Juniors Div 1 sides.


Well done flaggies on their 6th. A pretty remarkable achievement. I respectfully disagree and think while there are some struggles overall, I think Flaggy would be at least a good Div 2 side based on what I’ve seen, maybe even div 1 quality. It does drop away but the people that blame Flaggy for that are a bit warped in my opinion, they’ve set a great benchmark for everyone to try and beat. Perhaps all the other clubs need to look at themselves rather than whine at the quality of Flaggy.

The 15s was an amazing game of football. Well done to the wineflies, Reynella winning all 3 junior grades shows the club has a huge future ahead.

They won the u14 sanfl comp flag as well.
4 junior premierships is a remarkable achievement.
tigerpie
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4110
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Has liked: 498 times
Been liked: 429 times

Re: Southern Football League

Postby King » Wed Sep 22, 2021 5:28 pm

For the trivia buffs.
Flaggies winning margin in both the 2020 and 2021 premierships was 66 points. Remarkably, their average winning margin over their past 4 premierships (2018 - 21) is also 66 points! Coincidences do occur! As a side line, their average winning margin over all 6 premierships is 53 points.
User avatar
King
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:08 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 13 times
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Southern Football League

Postby jake the snake » Wed Sep 22, 2021 8:52 pm

Hearing Porties are close to an announcement for coach. Another club going down the playing coach path
jake the snake
Under 16s
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:24 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Southern Football League

Postby Yank Man » Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:48 pm

jake the snake wrote:Hearing Porties are close to an announcement for coach. Another club going down the playing coach path



Pretty serious appointment if what I’m hearing is what you’re hearing jake the snake. Very very big if true.
Yank Man
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2861
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 7:15 am
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 316 times
Grassroots Team: Edwardstown

Re: Southern Football League

Postby shoe boy » Thu Sep 23, 2021 9:34 am

Yank Man wrote:
jake the snake wrote:Hearing Porties are close to an announcement for coach. Another club going down the playing coach path



Pretty serious appointment if what I’m hearing is what you’re hearing jake the snake. Very very big if true.


Ex Glenelg and Jervious , Josh Scott.

And hearing N Mott back home at the Shoe.
User avatar
shoe boy
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4529
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:58 pm
Has liked: 488 times
Been liked: 209 times

Re: Southern Football League

Postby Divers » Thu Sep 23, 2021 12:38 pm

jake the snake wrote:Hearing Porties are close to an announcement for coach. Another club going down the playing coach path


Out of the loop what happened to this years head coach?

shoe boy - mott bringing a few compass boys with him i hear
Divers
Member
 
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 8:21 pm
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: Port Noarlunga

Re: Southern Football League

Postby shoe boy » Thu Sep 23, 2021 12:46 pm

Divers wrote:
jake the snake wrote:Hearing Porties are close to an announcement for coach. Another club going down the playing coach path


Out of the loop what happened to this years head coach?

shoe boy - mott bringing a few compass boys with him i hear


Not sure of Nick bringing anyone but I am aware of a number of shoe boys who have not played for a while keen to return.
User avatar
shoe boy
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4529
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:58 pm
Has liked: 488 times
Been liked: 209 times

Re: Southern Football League

Postby KegLeg » Thu Sep 23, 2021 9:52 pm

shoe boy wrote:
Divers wrote:
jake the snake wrote:Hearing Porties are close to an announcement for coach. Another club going down the playing coach path


Out of the loop what happened to this years head coach?

shoe boy - mott bringing a few compass boys with him i hear


Not sure of Nick bringing anyone but I am aware of a number of shoe boys who have not played for a while keen to return.


Ah the return of the $hoe$. How they have been missed……
KegLeg
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 9:15 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: Elliston

Re: Southern Football League

Postby Broken Down Hack » Thu Oct 07, 2021 6:22 pm

shoe boy wrote:
Yank Man wrote:
jake the snake wrote:Hearing Porties are close to an announcement for coach. Another club going down the playing coach path



Pretty serious appointment if what I’m hearing is what you’re hearing jake the snake. Very very big if true.


Ex Glenelg and Jervious , Josh Scott.

And hearing N Mott back home at the Shoe.


Someone should tell Josh :shock:
Broken Down Hack
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 6:26 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Southern Football League

Postby oldman » Mon Oct 11, 2021 1:32 pm

Pretty decent appointment of Michael Handby for the Emu's
oldman
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 489
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 11:39 am
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 62 times
Grassroots Team: Morphett Vale

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  SFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |