Coronavirus (Covid19)

Anything!

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby Wedgie » Mon Jan 31, 2022 2:27 pm

stan wrote:Many employers are still not budging at the moment.

Sent from my CPH2005 using Tapatalk

Yep, my missus just told she will be working from home till at least the end of February.
When am I going to get the place to myself again? :(
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 50920
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2049 times
Been liked: 3891 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby RB » Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:06 pm

stan wrote:Many employers are still not budging at the moment.

Sent from my CPH2005 using Tapatalk
Therein lies the problem.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
RB
Coach
 
Posts: 5650
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:45 pm
Has liked: 766 times
Been liked: 1074 times

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby stan » Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:21 pm

Wedgie wrote:
stan wrote:Many employers are still not budging at the moment.

Sent from my CPH2005 using Tapatalk

Yep, my missus just told she will be working from home till at least the end of February.
When am I going to get the place to myself again? :(
My work is WFH for the next 2 weeks at this stage. They will review the situation again in a week or so.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15238
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1253 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby stan » Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:22 pm

RB wrote:
stan wrote:Many employers are still not budging at the moment.

Sent from my CPH2005 using Tapatalk
Therein lies the problem.
The thing is 25% is strange for a workplace to implement. Once it gets back to 50% I feel alot more workplaces will return.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15238
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1253 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:29 pm

stan wrote:
RB wrote:
stan wrote:Many employers are still not budging at the moment.

Sent from my CPH2005 using Tapatalk
Therein lies the problem.
The thing is 25% is strange for a workplace to implement. Once it gets back to 50% I feel alot more workplaces will return.

Workplaces have done their own risk assessments despite what Marshall is begging for now.

I'm not sure what the tipping point is to get people back into offices from a workplace view.

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 56770
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 11844 times
Been liked: 3600 times

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby Vamos » Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:31 pm

RB wrote:
stan wrote:Many employers are still not budging at the moment.

Sent from my CPH2005 using Tapatalk
Therein lies the problem.


I don't think they have a choice as a lot of workers have made arrangements based on the school directive, it's certainly a concern at my place.
Whoops, there goes another year. Whoops, there goes another pint of beer.
Vamos
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 2703
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2021 12:55 am
Has liked: 354 times
Been liked: 476 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby Jim05 » Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:31 pm

Wife’s work has gone back into the CBD at 25%. She is not one of those at this stage but wants to go back in but not if she has to wear a mask
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 47130
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1126 times
Been liked: 3552 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby stan » Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:10 pm

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
stan wrote:
RB wrote:
stan wrote:Many employers are still not budging at the moment.

Sent from my CPH2005 using Tapatalk
Therein lies the problem.
The thing is 25% is strange for a workplace to implement. Once it gets back to 50% I feel alot more workplaces will return.

Workplaces have done their own risk assessments despite what Marshall is begging for now.

I'm not sure what the tipping point is to get people back into offices from a workplace view.

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
From my experience, 50% was about the mark.

25% just seems like effort needed for no reason. If you have staff working from home and they can do so, you will gain very little from having 1 in 4 people in the office.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15238
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1253 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby locky801 » Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:48 pm

Office where my daughter works are doing a rotation roster between staff of working between home and the office, is working well and they are actually considering running with it full time, they are a world wide organisation and appears the way their overseas branches are now working
You cant change your past but you can sure hell shape you future
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 55928
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 3704 times
Been liked: 1170 times

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby Booney » Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:48 pm

I'm home every second week for the foreseeable future.

Two of us are home in a bubble each week alternating between 2 teams, if something goes to shit in the office the pair at home can go in.

Some businesses, particularly larger ones who have people functioning at 100% at home would be considering never going back into the one space. They'll vacate the larger premises with higher rent, downsize and people will have a better work life balance, as long as you're still productive it's win win for everyone.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58360
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7493 times
Been liked: 10776 times

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby stan » Mon Jan 31, 2022 7:20 pm

Booney wrote:I'm home every second week for the foreseeable future.

Two of us are home in a bubble each week alternating between 2 teams, if something goes to shit in the office the pair at home can go in.

Some businesses, particularly larger ones who have people functioning at 100% at home would be considering never going back into the one space. They'll vacate the larger premises with higher rent, downsize and people will have a better work life balance, as long as you're still productive it's win win for everyone.
My company was actually surprised at the efficiency they found through these lockdowns. Hence they have made it option to WFH up to 3 days a week in normal situations. Obviously that's changed with the current WFH mandate but once full capacity is back that's what we will have as an option.

I don't mind a few days at home. It can be great to for Knuckling down a getting some reports out.

I agree with what you are saying about larger work places. Huge savings can be made with smaller rents.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15238
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1253 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby MW » Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:30 am

Commercial property values in the CBD would be taking a massive hit...can't see the CBD ever getting back to how it used to
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13033
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2608 times
Been liked: 1848 times

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby jo172 » Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:43 am

Amazed that people are still proposing, financing and constructing new office buildings. Seems the last place I'd want my money.

Spoke to a partner and Ernst and Young in the middle of 2020, right after the first WFH blast. He said that there was no drop off in productivity that quarter, meanwhile partners are shelling out close to a mill a year in rent.

Not hard to see where that trend will go
jo172
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3491
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 6:00 pm
Has liked: 1198 times
Been liked: 724 times

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby Booney » Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:16 am

Unfortunately many of us would have some of our super tied into those high rise commercial developments that have been built in the last 3-5 years, particularly anyone with CBUS.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58360
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7493 times
Been liked: 10776 times

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby cracka » Tue Feb 01, 2022 11:28 am

Just caught the end of a news report & apparently the definition of full vaxed is changing to 3 doses.
Can snyone confirm or sh!t can this rumour
cracka
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3671
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:41 am
Has liked: 461 times
Been liked: 567 times
Grassroots Team: Onkaparinga Valley

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby MW » Tue Feb 01, 2022 11:29 am

cracka wrote:Just caught the end of a news report & apparently the definition of full vaxed is changing to 3 doses.
Can snyone confirm or sh!t can this rumour


My understanding is it might be for health care workers or similar.
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13033
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2608 times
Been liked: 1848 times

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 01, 2022 11:41 am

MW wrote:
cracka wrote:Just caught the end of a news report & apparently the definition of full vaxed is changing to 3 doses.
Can snyone confirm or sh!t can this rumour


My understanding is it might be for health care workers or similar.

Has the 3rd one been reduced from 5 months in SA?
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51352
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4346 times
Been liked: 7921 times

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Feb 01, 2022 11:44 am

Lightning McQueen wrote:
MW wrote:
cracka wrote:Just caught the end of a news report & apparently the definition of full vaxed is changing to 3 doses.
Can snyone confirm or sh!t can this rumour


My understanding is it might be for health care workers or similar.

Has the 3rd one been reduced from 5 months in SA?
I thought I heard last night it was down to 3months for booster

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 56770
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 11844 times
Been liked: 3600 times

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby MW » Tue Feb 01, 2022 11:47 am

how is anyone supposed to keep up with all this...
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13033
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2608 times
Been liked: 1848 times

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Postby Brodlach » Tue Feb 01, 2022 12:07 pm

Definitely 3 months
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
User avatar
Brodlach
Coach
 
 
Posts: 47323
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:18 pm
Location: Unley
Has liked: 72 times
Been liked: 4216 times
Grassroots Team: Colonel Light Gardens

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Pseudo and 16 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

cron