by Jimmy_041 » Thu Feb 24, 2022 10:22 am
by Armchair expert » Thu Feb 24, 2022 2:54 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Feb 25, 2022 10:26 am
by Jimmy_041 » Fri Feb 25, 2022 1:10 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:#isolyfe
I haven't shaved all week.
I go shower and put on a shirt for my 10:15am daily zoom.
I get excited hearing the postie coming up the street and watch him drive past my letterbox.
I actually talk to people when they ring.
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Feb 25, 2022 1:30 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:#isolyfe
I haven't shaved all week.
I go shower and put on a shirt for my 10:15am daily zoom.
I get excited hearing the postie coming up the street and watch him drive past my letterbox.
I actually talk to people when they ring.
Have you bought solar or blue pills yet?
by stan » Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:30 am
by Jimmy_041 » Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:41 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:55 am
Caveat on that is that SAPOL personnel not fully vaccinated have to undertake mandatory RAT before every shift and must wear a mask at all timesJimmy_041 wrote:Is the “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” over?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-04/ ... /100881214
10 days before the Court case - WAFP.
They should change their claim to a loss of wages if it wasn’t already in there
And down they go in NZ: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/462 ... orce-staff
by Jimmy_041 » Sat Mar 05, 2022 6:46 pm
Jim05 wrote:Caveat on that is that SAPOL personnel not fully vaccinated have to undertake mandatory RAT before every shift and must wear a mask at all timesJimmy_041 wrote:Is the “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” over?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-04/ ... /100881214
10 days before the Court case - WAFP.
They should change their claim to a loss of wages if it wasn’t already in there
And down they go in NZ: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/462 ... orce-staff
by MatteeG » Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:47 am
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Mar 07, 2022 12:31 pm
by am Bays » Mon Mar 07, 2022 12:34 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Caveat on that is that SAPOL personnel not fully vaccinated have to undertake mandatory RAT before every shift and must wear a mask at all timesJimmy_041 wrote:Is the “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” over?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-04/ ... /100881214
10 days before the Court case - WAFP.
They should change their claim to a loss of wages if it wasn’t already in there
And down they go in NZ: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/462 ... orce-staff
Could have done that from the start but coercion makes them feel more powerful
Oh hang on; back them RATs were deemed unreliable. Something changed (& it’s not the RATs)
The timing is exquisite with the Court case in the next fortnight
It may not go the same way - Australians don’t have the protection of a Bill of Rights like NZ
by Wedgie » Mon Mar 07, 2022 12:54 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:What Pfizer didn't want you to know for 75 years
https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/chd-says-pfizer-fda-dropped-205400826.html
Children's Health Defense is an American 501 nonprofit activist group mainly known for anti-vaccine activities and has been identified as one of the main sources of misinformation on vaccines.
by Booney » Mon Mar 07, 2022 12:55 pm
Wedgie wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:What Pfizer didn't want you to know for 75 years
https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/chd-says-pfizer-fda-dropped-205400826.html
Not a great source. Credibility zero.Children's Health Defense is an American 501 nonprofit activist group mainly known for anti-vaccine activities and has been identified as one of the main sources of misinformation on vaccines.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Mar 07, 2022 1:21 pm
am Bays wrote:
The data on RATS test reliability hasn't changed in the last 18 months, still 80%.
Basically 100% reliable if it says you're positive. The issue is 15-20 % of negatives RATS are actually positive, PCR tests less ~ 3% of negatives are actually positives
Meanwhile almost 20% of the NT population ahs had COVID (~ 46K cases) compared to ~ 10% in SA (~160K cases)
by amber_fluid » Mon Mar 07, 2022 1:29 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:am Bays wrote:
The data on RATS test reliability hasn't changed in the last 18 months, still 80%.
Basically 100% reliable if it says you're positive. The issue is 15-20 % of negatives RATS are actually positive, PCR tests less ~ 3% of negatives are actually positives
Meanwhile almost 20% of the NT population ahs had COVID (~ 46K cases) compared to ~ 10% in SA (~160K cases)
The information supplied is only 100% accurate 70% of the the time, only 50% of them occasions depend who made the RAT.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Mar 07, 2022 1:43 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:am Bays wrote:
The data on RATS test reliability hasn't changed in the last 18 months, still 80%.
Basically 100% reliable if it says you're positive. The issue is 15-20 % of negatives RATS are actually positive, PCR tests less ~ 3% of negatives are actually positives
Meanwhile almost 20% of the NT population ahs had COVID (~ 46K cases) compared to ~ 10% in SA (~160K cases)
The information supplied is only 100% accurate 70% of the the time, only 50% of them occasions depend who made the RAT.
And three fifths of **** all is still **** all!
by stan » Mon Mar 07, 2022 2:35 pm
Mandates should be scraped now, if SAPOL have scraped then why bother on other work places.Jimmy_041 wrote:Is the “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” over?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-04/ ... /100881214
10 days before the Court case - WAFP.
They should change their claim to a loss of wages if it wasn’t already in there
And down they go in NZ: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/462 ... orce-staff
by am Bays » Mon Mar 07, 2022 2:37 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:am Bays wrote:
The data on RATS test reliability hasn't changed in the last 18 months, still 80%.
Basically 100% reliable if it says you're positive. The issue is 15-20 % of negatives RATS are actually positive, PCR tests less ~ 3% of negatives are actually positives
Meanwhile almost 20% of the NT population ahs had COVID (~ 46K cases) compared to ~ 10% in SA (~160K cases)
The information supplied is only 100% accurate 70% of the the time, only 50% of them occasions depend who made the RAT.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:20 pm
am Bays wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:
The information supplied is only 100% accurate 70% of the the time, only 50% of them occasions depend who made the RAT.
What's your standard error of estimate on those percentages?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |