by whufc » Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:39 am
by Armchair expert » Wed Mar 09, 2022 11:23 am
whufc wrote:Ill put it in here.
MCC have changed the laws as of October 1.
A new batter will be on strike following a caught dismissal even if the previous batter had crossed the middle before the catch was taken.
I like this for ammo/country cricket, the umpires watch the ball worried/happy their teammate is going to be out and its usually the one observant fielder who yells out, they didn't cross....makes it heaps easier at our shit level.
by RB » Wed Mar 09, 2022 12:15 pm
Armchair expert wrote:no more mankad its now a runout.
by heater31 » Wed Mar 09, 2022 1:37 pm
The Mankad definition has been removed from law 41 (unfair play) and shifted to law 38 (run out)RB wrote:Armchair expert wrote:no more mankad its now a runout.
What?
by DOC » Wed Mar 09, 2022 1:44 pm
Armchair expert wrote:whufc wrote:Ill put it in here.
MCC have changed the laws as of October 1.
A new batter will be on strike following a caught dismissal even if the previous batter had crossed the middle before the catch was taken.
I like this for ammo/country cricket, the umpires watch the ball worried/happy their teammate is going to be out and its usually the one observant fielder who yells out, they didn't cross....makes it heaps easier at our shit level.
I always ask the ump if they crossed just to be a c**t
Other rule changes, saliva is now ball tampering and no more mankad its now a runout.
by RB » Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:47 pm
Gotcha. Was confused by Army's post as a 'mankad' has always been scored as a run out. It has never been a separate mode of dismissal.heater31 wrote:The Mankad definition has been removed from law 41 (unfair play) and shifted to law 38 (run out)RB wrote:Armchair expert wrote:no more mankad its now a runout.
What?
by whufc » Wed Mar 09, 2022 3:53 pm
by locky801 » Wed Mar 09, 2022 4:20 pm
by locky801 » Wed Mar 09, 2022 4:27 pm
by heater31 » Wed Mar 09, 2022 5:03 pm
Takes effect October 1.locky801 wrote:bought in just for time of cricket finals lol, who is game
by locky801 » Wed Mar 09, 2022 6:00 pm
heater31 wrote:Takes effect October 1.locky801 wrote:bought in just for time of cricket finals lol, who is game
by jackpot jim » Wed Mar 09, 2022 10:18 pm
whufc wrote:Ill put it in here.
MCC have changed the laws as of October 1.
A new batter will be on strike following a caught dismissal even if the previous batter had crossed the middle before the catch was taken.
I like this for ammo/country cricket, the umpires watch the ball worried/happy their teammate is going to be out and its usually the one observant fielder who yells out, they didn't cross....makes it heaps easier at our shit level.
by whufc » Thu Mar 10, 2022 8:06 am
by Brodlach » Fri Mar 11, 2022 3:59 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by locky801 » Fri Mar 11, 2022 4:28 pm
Brodlach wrote:Hazelwood dropped for Swepson
by The Dark Knight » Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:26 pm
Good to see Swepson get an opportunity, really interested to see he goes. I'm also interested to read/hear from the Aussies why he replaces Hazlewood and not Starc.locky801 wrote:Brodlach wrote:Hazelwood dropped for Swepson
Starc survives yet again
by The Dark Knight » Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:30 pm
West Indies ended day three on 9/373 with a lead of 62.whufc wrote:England all out 311, Bairstow making 140
West Indies currently 4/202, Braithwaite out for 55.
Holder current 43*, first test of the last series against England he hit a double ton.
by RB » Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:33 pm
I would imagine due to the footmarks assisting Lyon? But we'll see what they say.The Dark Knight wrote:Good to see Swepson get an opportunity, really interested to see he goes. I'm also interested to read/hear from the Aussies why he replaces Hazlewood and not Starc.locky801 wrote:Brodlach wrote:Hazelwood dropped for Swepson
Starc survives yet again
by The Dark Knight » Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:39 pm
Yes that is probably part of the reason, I just read that Cummins has indicated he expects some reverse swing so maybe that's why they've decided to pick Starc ahead of Hazlewood.RB wrote:I would imagine due to the footmarks assisting Lyon? But we'll see what they say.The Dark Knight wrote:Good to see Swepson get an opportunity, really interested to see he goes. I'm also interested to read/hear from the Aussies why he replaces Hazlewood and not Starc.locky801 wrote:Brodlach wrote:Hazelwood dropped for Swepson
Starc survives yet again
It'll be interesting to see how Lyon goes bowling with Swepson. From memory, the GOAT hasn't always performed so well when deployed in tandem with another slow bowler.
by whufc » Sat Mar 12, 2022 7:14 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |