AFL Finals - Week 3

Talk on the national game

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby cokadonkeytoo » Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:39 pm

Cripps 3 votes in a 30 point loss............
Get that corn outta my face!!
User avatar
cokadonkeytoo
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 694
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 44 times
Grassroots Team: Para Hills

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby am Bays » Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:40 pm

Jim05 wrote:What a sham. The AFL golden boy getting looked after again

He was worth a vote v Adelaide but BOG

That and not rubbed out against Brisbane
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18558
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 1809 times

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby am Bays » Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:52 pm

Joke
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18558
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 1809 times

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby Jim05 » Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:52 pm

2022 winner needs a Asterix next to it.
Disgraceful
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 47130
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1126 times
Been liked: 3552 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby Dutchy » Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:59 pm

WTF did they mention Selwood just then?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 44531
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2324 times
Been liked: 3499 times

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby MW » Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:00 pm

Dutchy wrote:WTF did they mention Selwood just then?


Was ridiculous and random
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13033
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2608 times
Been liked: 1848 times

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby Bum Crack » Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:29 pm

MW wrote:
Dutchy wrote:WTF did they mention Selwood just then?


Was ridiculous and random

I agree. That was weird as ****
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
Bum Crack
Coach
 
Posts: 7883
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Here
Has liked: 320 times
Been liked: 890 times
Grassroots Team: Berri

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby Turbo » Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:44 pm

Jim05 wrote:2022 winner needs a Asterix next to it.
Disgraceful
Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Turbo
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 2683
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Lygon Street - The Holy Land
Has liked: 44 times
Been liked: 38 times
Grassroots Team: Cove

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby gadj1976 » Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:36 am

am Bays wrote:
Jim05 wrote:What a sham. The AFL golden boy getting looked after again

He was worth a vote v Adelaide but BOG

That and not rubbed out against Brisbane


I was at the game v Adelaide and no way was he BOG, however every game and every player are in the same boat; being voted upon by numpties.
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9149
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 796 times
Been liked: 850 times

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby amber_fluid » Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:41 am

Very worthy winner!
As good as any going around at the moment.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13449
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 10:18 am
Has liked: 2227 times
Been liked: 2523 times

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby Booney » Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:43 am

How many umpires couldn't tell the difference between Amon and Rozee?
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58360
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7493 times
Been liked: 10776 times

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby DOC » Mon Sep 19, 2022 9:04 am

FFS. An award voted by umpires.

Basically meaningless.
User avatar
DOC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17970
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:15 pm
Has liked: 731 times
Been liked: 2086 times

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby am Bays » Mon Sep 19, 2022 9:22 am

DOC wrote:FFS. An award voted by umpires.

Basically meaningless.


I was going to argue we shouldnt even be arguing about teh umpires as he should have been ruled ineligible after that charging incident in rd 21.

However the fact a free wasnt paid negates my argument...
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18558
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 1809 times

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby DOC » Mon Sep 19, 2022 10:01 am

Except

AFL boss Gill McLachlan has said he is “very agitated” by the controversial league Appeals Board decision that ultimately gave Patrick Cripps Brownlow glory.

The Carlton skipper’s chances of claiming the prestigious individual honour looked to be dead in the water in August after he was hit with a two-match ban for a bump on Brisbane’s Callum Ah Chee.

But after a four-and-a-half hour hearing Cripps was freed to play, and it became even more of a significant decision when he took out the Brownlow Medal on Sunday night by just one vote.

But in this week’s AFL Record McLachlan teed off at the decision to overturn Cripps’ suspension.

“People are aware I was very agitated by that (Appeals Board) decision,” McLachlan told AFL Record two weeks ago.

“It made no sense to me in any way and it is frustrating to have a legal view about due process or procedural fairness - a complete nonsense - really affect a clear mandate to protect the head.

“We confused our supporters and set ourselves back and that really frustrates me.

“When you can have something that is so important, which is protecting the head, and a clear statement from the MRO and backed up by the Tribunal, and then the player getting off because of a legal technicality and nobody really understanding what the hell happened, I find that challenging.

“So, I have asked the guys to review the system and we will see where that lands.”

A “failure to afford procedural fairness” by the Tribunal when hitting Cripps with a two-game suspension was key to the Appeals Board’s decision.

Carlton’s counsel argued for almost two hours that Cripps had been denied “natural justice” in the initial hearing and the original Tribunal jury had not been adequately directed before it reached its finding.

The Board said this amounted to an “error of law”.

The Board also said that it could not see how the Tribunal could have arrived at the conclusion Cripps’ actions were “in the bumping of an opponent”.

This was because the Board found that the Tribunal, who concluded Cripps bumped Ah Chee, did not actually receive any indication from Cripps or his legal representatives to suggest it.

Ah Chee was concussed from the incident and missed multiple weeks as a result of it.
User avatar
DOC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17970
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:15 pm
Has liked: 731 times
Been liked: 2086 times

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby Jim05 » Mon Sep 19, 2022 10:12 am

Booney wrote:How many umpires couldn't tell the difference between Amon and Rozee?
As a neutral I thought Amon had a pretty solid year and I think you need that element of “flashiness” to get votes.
Unfortunately it will always be a midfielders medal. The two best defenders in the comp didn’t poll a single vote between them
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 47130
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1126 times
Been liked: 3552 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby Mr Beefy » Mon Sep 19, 2022 10:21 am

Jim05 wrote:
Booney wrote:How many umpires couldn't tell the difference between Amon and Rozee?
As a neutral I thought Amon had a pretty solid year and I think you need that element of “flashiness” to get votes.
Unfortunately it will always be a midfielders medal. The two best defenders in the comp didn’t poll a single vote between them

Tom Stewart got 9, I dont know which defender you think is better than him
User avatar
Mr Beefy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5051
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:18 pm
Has liked: 406 times
Been liked: 651 times
Grassroots Team: Rosewater

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby Booney » Mon Sep 19, 2022 10:26 am

Jim05 wrote:
Booney wrote:How many umpires couldn't tell the difference between Amon and Rozee?
As a neutral I thought Amon had a pretty solid year and I think you need that element of “flashiness” to get votes.
Unfortunately it will always be a midfielders medal. The two best defenders in the comp didn’t poll a single vote between them


Moore - 0 votes
Barrass - 0 votes
May - 0 votes (AA)
Lever - 1 vote
Stewart - 9 votes (AA)*
Weitering - 0 votes
Taylor - 1 vote (AA)
Maynard - 0 votes (AA)
Saad - 3 votes (AA Half back flank )
Steele - 13 votes (AA Half back flank )
Sicily- 7 votes

You could say only Stewart of the AA team got votes.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58360
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7493 times
Been liked: 10776 times

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby Lightning McQueen » Mon Sep 19, 2022 11:06 am

I boxed the top 3 in a trifecta so I was pretty happy, Tom Mitchell was my only failure in an 11 leg multi, should've gone Newcombe.

The count will always be flawed as Oliver and Petracca are arguably the two best mids in the game atm but then they have Maxy who polls well, chuck in Viney and Brayshaw then they'll never win the Brownlow playing for the Dee's.

I have no qualms with Cripps wining it, the bloke leaves nothing on the field and shouldn't have got games anyway.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51352
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4346 times
Been liked: 7921 times

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby JK » Mon Sep 19, 2022 11:09 am

Cripps was $11 when suspended then un-suspended, had to know that meant he was right up there, worked out alright here :D

Speaking with a mate this morning whos heavily involved in the football industry, who said the AFL HATES the thought of a winner being ineligible, which is something I really don't understand. IMHO if someone gets rubbed out but tops the count, it just adds to the folklore of footy. Personally I've never cared for the "fairest" aspect and fail to see how it's relevant. Who cares if one of your players isn't the fairest, but is still brilliant and/or prolific?? Easiest way is to drop the fairest criteria imho.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37377
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4460 times
Been liked: 2988 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: AFL Finals - Week 3

Postby The Dark Knight » Mon Sep 19, 2022 11:34 am

Booney wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
Booney wrote:How many umpires couldn't tell the difference between Amon and Rozee?
As a neutral I thought Amon had a pretty solid year and I think you need that element of “flashiness” to get votes.
Unfortunately it will always be a midfielders medal. The two best defenders in the comp didn’t poll a single vote between them


Moore - 0 votes
Barrass - 0 votes
May - 0 votes (AA)
Lever - 1 vote
Stewart - 9 votes (AA)*
Weitering - 0 votes
Taylor - 1 vote (AA)
Maynard - 0 votes (AA)
Saad - 3 votes (AA Half back flank )
Steele - 13 votes (AA Half back flank )
Sicily- 7 votes

You could say only Stewart of the AA team got votes.

Jack Steele? You mean Jack Sinclair who was named in the AA team, got 9 votes.
User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
 
Posts: 34457
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:32 pm
Location: Gotham City
Has liked: 10340 times
Been liked: 1520 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |