by Booney » Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:06 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:11 pm
by The Bedge » Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:12 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Armchair expert » Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:13 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:14 pm
The Bedge wrote:This is good, I like it.
by Corona Man » Fri Nov 18, 2022 5:18 pm
by MatteeG » Fri Nov 18, 2022 5:22 pm
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by whufc » Mon Nov 21, 2022 10:23 am
by UK Fan » Mon Nov 21, 2022 2:37 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by whufc » Mon Nov 21, 2022 4:17 pm
by Jim05 » Wed Nov 23, 2022 10:13 pm
We do a stack of work in Tassie and the majority of our staff down there reckon the North/South divide is a bit of a beat up these days and that it’s nowhere near as bad as even 10 years ago.UK Fan wrote:I went to Tassie(Hobart) in July and the locals were skeptical. Apparently there is a big north/south divide on the island. Hobart doesnt particularly like Launceston and vice versa.
A couple of guys who worked for North Hobart Fc said you need to have 6 games at York park(launceston) and 6 games at BLundestone (hobart) for it to truly work ie capture the entire states interest.
If based in Hobart Launceston people wont support and same goes for Hobartians if they based the afl club in Launceston.
INteresting times ahead.
by Vamos » Mon Nov 28, 2022 9:15 pm
whufc wrote:First AFL team to be named after a state not a city/town.
by Jimmy_041 » Tue Nov 29, 2022 1:24 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Should've been called the Maps.
by tigerpie » Mon May 01, 2023 9:13 pm
by Vamos » Mon May 01, 2023 9:31 pm
tigerpie wrote:So it's on.
I'm thinking it's great for the game.
Not necessarily the standard, (dilution of the pool) but give it time.
Next, should be an NT side if the AFL are fair dinkum.
by tigerpie » Mon May 01, 2023 10:36 pm
Vamos wrote:tigerpie wrote:So it's on.
I'm thinking it's great for the game.
Not necessarily the standard, (dilution of the pool) but give it time.
Next, should be an NT side if the AFL are fair dinkum.
Gonna be a nightmare for fantasy footy. Don't reckon it will be as simple as 1 team per round has a bye, there'll be 3 and 5 teams having byes in a round at times.
by am Bays » Mon May 01, 2023 10:51 pm
by tigerpie » Mon May 01, 2023 11:01 pm
am Bays wrote:There’s more people in the City of Onkaparinga than in the NT
by am Bays » Mon May 01, 2023 11:15 pm
tigerpie wrote:am Bays wrote:There’s more people in the City of Onkaparinga than in the NT
The AFL games go alright up there don't they?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |