34 to make, can Warner see it through?Corona Man wrote:RB wrote:The Saffers starting to get that target up now.
Enough runs to see old mate Warner sent back to the Pavillon
by The Dark Knight » Sun Dec 18, 2022 4:31 pm
34 to make, can Warner see it through?Corona Man wrote:RB wrote:The Saffers starting to get that target up now.
Enough runs to see old mate Warner sent back to the Pavillon
by Corona Man » Sun Dec 18, 2022 4:32 pm
by Armchair expert » Sun Dec 18, 2022 4:57 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Dec 18, 2022 4:59 pm
by Brodlach » Sun Dec 18, 2022 5:00 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by amber_fluid » Sun Dec 18, 2022 5:00 pm
Jim05 wrote:We are going to carry Warner this summer aren’t we
by amber_fluid » Sun Dec 18, 2022 5:07 pm
Brodlach wrote:We couldn’t do a Sydney Thunder could we?
2/9
by jackpot jim » Sun Dec 18, 2022 5:16 pm
Corona Man wrote:A 2 day test match is disappointing but I don’t blame the pitch.
by Armchair expert » Sun Dec 18, 2022 5:17 pm
by mickey » Sun Dec 18, 2022 5:17 pm
by DOC » Sun Dec 18, 2022 5:26 pm
by Corona Man » Sun Dec 18, 2022 5:45 pm
jackpot jim wrote:Corona Man wrote:A 2 day test match is disappointing but I don’t blame the pitch.
I think the pitch has a lot to do with it.
When balls are exploding over the keepers Head for 5 wides one could say it's not ideal
by spell_check » Sun Dec 18, 2022 6:39 pm
by gadj1976 » Sun Dec 18, 2022 6:40 pm
Corona Man wrote:A 2 day test match is disappointing but I don’t blame the pitch.
by gadj1976 » Sun Dec 18, 2022 6:45 pm
spell_check wrote:Why not have a wicket that produces something close to an even contest and not to either extreme? Why is it, it's the batting that is the problem on decks like these, but never the bowling on a flat deck?
by gadj1976 » Sun Dec 18, 2022 6:46 pm
DOC wrote:BUT
Pitch a disgrace. 2/10 just.
Time to tear the GABBA down.
by The Dark Knight » Sun Dec 18, 2022 6:52 pm
I just read that it's only the second time a test in Australia has been completed in two days and it's the second shortest by balls bowled in Australia.gadj1976 wrote:Corona Man wrote:A 2 day test match is disappointing but I don’t blame the pitch.
What do you put it down to?
In 150 years of test match cricket, how many 'less than 2 days tests' have occurred? Remembering, anything pre say 1940 was an uncovered pitch.
by gadj1976 » Sun Dec 18, 2022 6:53 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:I just read that it's only the second time a test in Australia has been completed in two days and it's the second shortest by balls bowled in Australia.gadj1976 wrote:Corona Man wrote:A 2 day test match is disappointing but I don’t blame the pitch.
What do you put it down to?
In 150 years of test match cricket, how many 'less than 2 days tests' have occurred? Remembering, anything pre say 1940 was an uncovered pitch.
by The Dark Knight » Sun Dec 18, 2022 8:01 pm
It's also the second shortest completed test match in balls bowled (866) since WW2. The shortest is India v England in Ahmedabad (842) last year.gadj1976 wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I just read that it's only the second time a test in Australia has been completed in two days and it's the second shortest by balls bowled in Australia.gadj1976 wrote:Corona Man wrote:A 2 day test match is disappointing but I don’t blame the pitch.
What do you put it down to?
In 150 years of test match cricket, how many 'less than 2 days tests' have occurred? Remembering, anything pre say 1940 was an uncovered pitch.
But it's not the pitch? ;-)
Edit: the West Indies lasted longer than the Sth Africans.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |